RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
fMRI statistics under attack again; bonfire of papers due shortly https://t.co/WOCXFqAxC7
RT @davidgruber: @katecrawford the associated journal article attached here for added value: https://t.co/fyhwtKw9en
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
Did you know - common software packages for fMRI analysis can resulting in 70% false positive results? Learn more - https://t.co/b0OF9t6K6s
https://t.co/xpohK23wKN "we found that the most common software packages for fMRI analysis can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%"
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
RT @davidgruber: @katecrawford the associated journal article attached here for added value: https://t.co/fyhwtKw9en
"the most common software packages for fMRI analysis (...) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%" https://t.co/hmnoReck6x
@ScientistTrump, how will you prevent such scandals? False + rates <70% - questions validity of 40,000 fMRI studies! https://t.co/RSHl3RBwdt
RT @erinlpc: &, the best title of an academic article award for the day goes to... https://t.co/Y9b9sZaG4S https://t.co/FjB7XGbBpg
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
RT @modernscientist: Article about fMRI software bug: “lamentable archiving and data-sharing practices mean most could not be reanalyzed” h…
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @modernscientist: Article about fMRI software bug: “lamentable archiving and data-sharing practices mean most could not be reanalyzed” h…
RT @halletecco: New study suggests an fMRI false-positive rate of up to 70% https://t.co/6t34lUkoOE via @ddiamond https://t.co/wgLt1ppoUo
years of brain research under threat from buggy fMRI software with high false positive rates https://t.co/KjEbSKu9TE
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
RT @halletecco: New study suggests an fMRI false-positive rate of up to 70% https://t.co/6t34lUkoOE via @ddiamond https://t.co/wgLt1ppoUo
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
Full paper here: https://t.co/LBA33IwjkD Thoughts on this CNSers? #neuroscience #fMRI
RT @pierre_azoulay: Paging all innovation-minded economics grad students: natural experiment alert! https://t.co/WGV3nILMKN
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
Recent article raises questions on the validity of common software packages for #fMRI analysis. #interesting https://t.co/dDA2vUlMwf
PNAS | Mobile https://t.co/PxESBUrW8m これがその論文。偉い。
Recent findings place 20 years of research and 40,000 published papers in to question: https://t.co/w0w029fh65
RT @PhilippBayer: Ouch! "the most common software packages for fMRI analysis ([.]) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%" https:/…
Cluster Failure and the Future of fMRI. These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies: https://t.co/oMAud3RkXE
RT @halletecco: New study suggests an fMRI false-positive rate of up to 70% https://t.co/6t34lUkoOE via @ddiamond https://t.co/wgLt1ppoUo
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
"These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/qNccM6PyTc
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
Paging all innovation-minded economics grad students: natural experiment alert! https://t.co/WGV3nILMKN
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
Oh, dear: https://t.co/OBvwRMAM8o
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
RT @davidgruber: @katecrawford the associated journal article attached here for added value: https://t.co/fyhwtKw9en
RT @alexey_r: "the most common software packages for fMRI analysis can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%" https://t.co/OMgu76JIdD
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
RT @annbot: .@MarkHahnel PNAS paper came out last week - software has a bug, questions the validity of 40,000 studies! #SEBAMM https://t.co…
70% false positives?! -MRI SW bugs could upend years of research https://t.co/795ikg87bv via @theregister https://t.co/HaUxvEGxz4
正確な理解のためには元論文 https://t.co/HOKqUbHZ1G を読みましょう、ということで。
「fMRIは原理的に結果を盛っちゃうからね」という趣旨の論文。うん、知ってる♡ https://t.co/EWNEQZgeHD
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/NKFx3UuVHf [h/t @Dereklowe]
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
RT @annbot: .@MarkHahnel PNAS paper came out last week - software has a bug, questions the validity of 40,000 studies! #SEBAMM https://t.co…
RT @annbot: .@MarkHahnel PNAS paper came out last week - software has a bug, questions the validity of 40,000 studies! #SEBAMM https://t.co…
RT @annbot: .@MarkHahnel PNAS paper came out last week - software has a bug, questions the validity of 40,000 studies! #SEBAMM https://t.co…
RT @davidgruber: @katecrawford the associated journal article attached here for added value: https://t.co/fyhwtKw9en
.@MarkHahnel PNAS paper came out last week - software has a bug, questions the validity of 40,000 studies! #SEBAMM https://t.co/CzRGJefneP
RT @alexey_r: "the most common software packages for fMRI analysis can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%" https://t.co/OMgu76JIdD
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @marcelsalathe: 😱 "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/Ob4RPJQ5wi https://t.co/vE3UDNLM6U
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
RT @wilm: Check your code, folks. Source journal article here: https://t.co/3IZr2XIbXp https://t.co/jIukQqeZ99
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/k1JBGl5b7o
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/jlsNZpKf0i
RT @modernscientist: Article about fMRI software bug: “lamentable archiving and data-sharing practices mean most could not be reanalyzed” h…
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
RT @davidgruber: @katecrawford the associated journal article attached here for added value: https://t.co/fyhwtKw9en
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @marcelsalathe: 😱 "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/Ob4RPJQ5wi https://t.co/vE3UDNLM6U
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
fMRI false positive rates of 70%+ blamed on research community's "lamentable archiving and data-sharing practices" https://t.co/122OXnEzx3
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
Unending gratitude to these guys, who finally decided to test if fMRI software...measured anything. Which, #science https://t.co/FAUuejDNPd
Over missers gesproken: software voor fMRI's grootschalig de mist in: https://t.co/1nXsWySAVR
RT @pathogenomenick: Functional MRI studies an absolutely scandalous waste of time and money https://t.co/jrxs6dOHyZ https://t.co/N2CjjnmywQ
I'm not saying fMRI is all a bunch of post-modern phrenology best analysed in Photoshop. But: https://t.co/Qs58oYrm0M
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @pathogenomenick: Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: http…
MRI software bugs could upend years of research https://t.co/i0Y2HuDsSX #neuroscience
Shocking; fMRI analysis software doesn't work properly and weak data sharing in fields means can't be reanalysed: https://t.co/jrxs6dOHyZ
RT @katecrawford: Here's a link to the original journal article: "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies." https:/…
RT @marcelsalathe: 😱 "These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies" https://t.co/Ob4RPJQ5wi https://t.co/vE3UDNLM6U
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @pathogenomenick: Functional MRI studies an absolutely scandalous waste of time and money https://t.co/jrxs6dOHyZ https://t.co/N2CjjnmywQ
Functional MRI studies an absolutely scandalous waste of time and money https://t.co/jrxs6dOHyZ https://t.co/N2CjjnmywQ
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @fulhack: Gaussian assumption turned out to be wrong, 40k papers called into question https://t.co/QxneaT78hm (dad joke: is this the new…