Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/at87pV57FK
@tbrissaire De plus la significativité des résultats d'IRMf est remise en cause par les chercheurs eux mêmes https://t.co/DqkRCh0SUO
@practiCalfMRI @ETagliazucchi @Labrigger Also, it sounds like false positives to me due to poor multiple comparison control. See @wandedob et @ten_photos 's https://t.co/eb7zQERjEu
Why fMRI Inferences for Spatial Extent Have Inflated False-Positive Rates https://t.co/6GTMjjsT5S
@DaveclarkR I'm still flabbergasted at the MRI baseline issues https://t.co/8HdYZ0gReQ
The most common software packages for fMRI analysis (SPM, FSL, AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70% https://t.co/4FyzsPEagB
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/oj7eAzlAP0
@chrisoldfield be careful. BOLD MRI is full of errors. https://t.co/Jbei9q6sj7
RT @BlakeLaPierre: @akornblatt, I haven't said anything about peer review, but I disagree that it can be trusted. Peers kept approving: htt…
@akornblatt, I haven't said anything about peer review, but I disagree that it can be trusted. Peers kept approving: https://t.co/mTtEOL4lid https://t.co/FMatRFNm6z
@mnitabach @wandedob did something along those lines with his Cluster failure paper, but not exactly what you are proposing https://t.co/6vmM4WhyT5
RT @INCForg: .@wandedob: the analyses in our PNAS paper took 25 days with BROCCOLI. Would take decades with FSL https://t.co/XqlIRewNQJ #bh…
.@wandedob: the analyses in our PNAS paper took 25 days with BROCCOLI. Would take decades with FSL https://t.co/XqlIRewNQJ #bhg17
#neuroscience #psychology #science https://t.co/JeUWKX5ZYK The software for fMRI analysis results in false-positive rates of up to 70% ins…
RT @carlesmuntaner: Data alone does not speak https://t.co/qnDxdbxouO
RT @carlesmuntaner: Data alone does not speak https://t.co/qnDxdbxouO
Data alone does not speak https://t.co/qnDxdbxouO
RT @camerontw: @nicolasnova fMRI - the fake news source for all your favorite biodeterministic research https://t.co/ahPuHwZs6n
And also our (mis)understanding of statistics! https://t.co/gIwp857TgH https://t.co/RGN1WgDreF
Um exemplo disso é o artigo de Eklund (2016) https://t.co/xZCTQjrnRa
@LebensTourist @sixtus Derartige Studien die unter anderem auf MRI Scans beruhen sind mit Vorsicht zu genießen. https://t.co/CI9MiU3jrL
RT @AlpSirman: Meraklısına fMRI daki yazılım bug u hakkında. https://t.co/JFJfQSG2M3 https://t.co/6BUNJV9Fu6 https://t.co/iD31uQiH2v
Meraklısına fMRI daki yazılım bug u hakkında. https://t.co/JFJfQSG2M3 https://t.co/6BUNJV9Fu6 https://t.co/iD31uQiH2v
RT @lofalexandria: #neuroscience #psychology #science https://t.co/JeUWKX5ZYK The software for fMRI analysis results in false-positive rate…
@AgnesWold @bodin_anna Låter som en av de där felaktiga fMRI-studierna. Se https://t.co/mUkMNv1QY7 – fMRI ska tas med en stor nypa salt.
@AgnesWold kan inte kommentera just det pappret, men 40% av 241 fMRI papper justerar inte för multiple testing. https://t.co/5wrTgfj7Yy
@AgnesWold @EiramRu @bodin_anna @NCBI Dra inte för stora växlar: studie med få deltagare + tveksam korrektion för falskt positiva fynd, jmf https://t.co/DYDZ9dYokK av @wandedob
#neuroscience #psychology #science https://t.co/JeUWKX5ZYK The software for fMRI analysis results in false-positive rates of up to 70% ins…
@Brain_Craft Hi Braincraft! Just read this paper: https://t.co/fk36TJ6hZT. How do you think it may affect neuroscience?
https://t.co/BJCWBYYJni - Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates Functional MRI (fMRI…
https://t.co/0Lgys0toeU 40,000 published studies using MRI may be wrong: software flaw That's why we make our own tools @RioNeuro #craftsmen
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates | PNAS https://t.co/sRj38fETBa
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates | PNAS https://t.co/w7N5u2yNNj
@DucMantua Per si no ho sabies: https://t.co/ZiY9n2S3iW
RT @Roran_Stehl: @stillgray @sie_kensou77 @motherboard @erikkain https://t.co/wT07s53VsH and we're done.
@stillgray @sie_kensou77 @motherboard @erikkain https://t.co/wT07s53VsH and we're done.
@csabaorban @schoppik related research on (crazy) high false positive rates for fMRI: https://t.co/beu5yavC9x
RT @LEAD_Coalition: Why #fmri inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/dsSoxXDDMV and https://t.co/RtY…
Pour tout ceux qui utlisent de l'IRMf #fmri #cluster https://t.co/C1lLxftWFc
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/36HPeVsU3v
Why #fmri inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/dsSoxXDDMV and… https://t.co/zzdWQhR6Qa
RT @neuroraf: On cluster failure paper and fMRI false positive results https://t.co/Rsvt72QQBp in the @guardian by @CyrilRPernet https://t.…
RT @neuroraf: On cluster failure paper and fMRI false positive results https://t.co/Rsvt72QQBp in the @guardian by @CyrilRPernet https://t.…
RT @neuroraf: On cluster failure paper and fMRI false positive results https://t.co/Rsvt72QQBp in the @guardian by @CyrilRPernet https://t.…
On cluster failure paper and fMRI false positive results https://t.co/Rsvt72QQBp in the @guardian by @CyrilRPernet… https://t.co/PsgTbyByw2
@nntaleb how do psychologists and pop-scientists sleep when fMRIs have been known for false positive rates of 70%. https://t.co/PopzHAQ1Vf
Media loves a brain study, but as Nat'l Academies points out, brain imaging may not be accurate or reliable. https://t.co/Mr0Jl0tNA1 https://t.co/unK6TZCsLg
Why you should never p: False error rate in fMRI 70% instead of 5% b/c non-Gaussianity cc @masterbaboon https://t.co/XG5mlMAz8D
Wish more was made of the finding that PCC was the hot spot of false positive activation from this paper https://t.co/sIYQvv2mdP
WOW... WHAT?! 40,000 medical studies down the drain for medical researchers. MRI software is invalid https://t.co/rHnUfUx609 #medicalnews
@EssiViding Yes of course you are right. But surely fMRI disasters like https://t.co/yCVhG2tzXf are a product of poor understanding?
Neuroscience Methods and Models #JournalClub Next meeting: Thurs Oct 12, 4pm Article for discussion: Cluster failure https://t.co/X9Mlhcd5Ys
IRM fonctionnelle : trop de faux positifs https://t.co/5EPHkSZkR6 (+ https://t.co/aGZxz7Bq93 )
RT @AxionNeuro: #BigData can reveal important truths. @Neuro_Skeptic nailed it, started a brilliant discussion here:…
#BigData can reveal important truths. @Neuro_Skeptic nailed it, started a brilliant discussion here: https://t.co/jHYMjtHrKb #DeepMedicine https://t.co/dhmkiAASqm
This. Is it growing pains or the necrotic influence of a toxic mindset? https://t.co/bX8twpKUWm
RT @Rob_Briner: For all fans of neuro 'science' based on fMRI data - you might want to check this out. Oh dear. https://t.co/gmnkazT7K6
RT @Rob_Briner: For all fans of neuro 'science' based on fMRI data - you might want to check this out. Oh dear. https://t.co/gmnkazT7K6
For all fans of neuro 'science' based on fMRI data - you might want to check this out. Oh dear. https://t.co/gmnkazT7K6
@sjblakemore I do try to be not excessively skeptical, but what about https://t.co/etiAR6w9y2 and https://t.co/yCVhG2tzXf ? Surely worrying?
Great journal club discussing recent controversial fMRI paper by Eklund et al. We will be aware of default settings! https://t.co/dt3KFBgj2e
RT @BrainAlwaysWins: fMRI and false-positive rates-don't blame the tool https://t.co/RaDd2egNV5 @Chjparker @BrainAWins_Host https://t.co/Fd…
RT @BrainAlwaysWins: fMRI and false-positive rates-don't blame the tool https://t.co/RaDd2egNV5 @Chjparker @BrainAWins_Host https://t.co/Fd…
fMRI and false-positive rates-don't blame the tool https://t.co/RaDd2egNV5 @Chjparker @BrainAWins_Host https://t.co/FdSRxJeFRm
Neuro-imaging validity? Study finds fMRI analysis software packages may result in false-positives rate up to 70% https://t.co/uKaiq1vyPL
RT @kfranklinphd: fMRI plagued by false positives (open-access article) https://t.co/0PiC5ymW0b #faulty_science
fMRI plagued by false positives (open-access article) https://t.co/0PiC5ymW0b #faulty_science
PNAS | fMRI false positive rate inflated.. 20 years of science production to be revised?! https://t.co/RShJ38bylk
الدراسة التي أذّنت بالعيد قبل موعده: https://t.co/SlpRfuByQs
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/Xzv9mLXVUw
Best not to believe everything you read...even if it's science. #fMRI #neuroscience #artifacts https://t.co/teiryNclLP
Simple conclusion after the fMRI false-positivity. Validate the statistical method. https://t.co/5umW6h594g
"common software packages for #fMRI analysis...can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%" https://t.co/m5MwjDXOYd #ptsafety
Cluster failure: Why functional MRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/o2ErWe2bFO
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/jxrE76AZWz H/T @iamdavecampbell
OHBM blog recommendations https://t.co/nAaHXVJBo2 in response to controversy over cluster size inference in fMRI https://t.co/UAXne2carx
PNAS | Mobile https://t.co/kzpV4Fm7bH
RT @mrrobnewman: And here's link to that fMRI false positives paper in Proceedings of National Academy of Science of USA. Tim-berr! https:/…
RT @mrrobnewman: And here's link to that fMRI false positives paper in Proceedings of National Academy of Science of USA. Tim-berr! https:/…
And here's link to that fMRI false positives paper in Proceedings of National Academy of Science of USA. Tim-berr! https://t.co/4T3r1c0En3
RT @jevinwest: Software bugs driving science... fMRI false positive rates as high as 70%: https://t.co/hM78pdq7GY.
Software bugs driving science... fMRI false positive rates as high as 70%: https://t.co/hM78pdq7GY.
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
Never validated fMRI statistical methods in 25 years? Even after that Salmon head joke? Kind of unbelievable. https://t.co/REYF0JqNrX
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…
RT @hannorein: The paper says: "It is disappointing that almost none of the published studies have shared their data". https://t.co/8O5tduW…