RT @ResplendentElk: @CHSommers @cathleencrudden Indeed! "Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fi…
RT @ResplendentElk: @CHSommers @cathleencrudden Indeed! "Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fi…
@CHSommers @cathleencrudden Indeed! "Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles (single, married, divorced)..." https://t
National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track (Rated: Objective) https://t.co/zuEWYLADDC
RT @EliVieiraJr: O texto cita estudos que encontraram uma preferência de contratadores pelos ditos grupos "dominantes" (segundo os círculos…
O texto cita estudos que encontraram uma preferência de contratadores pelos ditos grupos "dominantes" (segundo os círculos concêntricos do Inferno de Dante adaptado que é a teoria interseccional). Não cita os que encontraram preferência por mulheres: https
@DrCastner The reason is that what you are describing would, if true, only impact the absolute levels, not the difference between blinded and unblinded applications. And of course it isn't true. https://t.co/3Y44rGXq6o
@I_Li_Li_I @NPR Yes you had bad events. As a class you are not opressed. And no women in tech are not opressed as a class unless you live in a victim bubble. Infact they are privelged in tech as a class https://t.co/pmo3do15zh... wot post about men? ACA ha
A @PNAS study concludes: "Cont to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members preferred female applicants 2:1 over (identically qualified) males with matching lifestyles. Our findings suggest adv for women launching academic science careers". h
RT @naguiar: Que economistas homens demonstram uma menor inclinação para contratar mulheres (em comparação com outras áreas) https://t.co/…
@naguiar Reli o teu texto, Nuno. Em nenhuma parte indicas isto: [Este é precisamente o estudo a que fazes referência no teu artigo: https://t.co/HnpayRClHk] https://t.co/g9Kp2oNWhi
@naguiar Não é isso que o estudo indica 👇 https://t.co/bgPIxIbnOD
Que economistas homens demonstram uma menor inclinação para contratar mulheres (em comparação com outras áreas) https://t.co/VUzsT11vDT https://t.co/mA0ZgqvMCm
@OlleFolke Ang. Williams och Ceci: "Men resultaten säger ingenting om vem som faktiskt anställdes." "Ingenting" är väl en överdrift? Författarna diskuterar sina resultat (om värdering av hypotetiska ansökningar) i relation till hur det faktiskt fungerar.
@Strawbebecherub @mkay_fain Just proves feminism 101, that was big news, yet the entire male population being undermarked (specfically by female teachers, men marked girls same as external examienrs) is barely news. As is this: https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ
@ZJAyres @AngelaDSaini @jesswade I read a review [1]. So women are discriminated because THEY THEMSELVES shun the STEM disciplines, while receiving 60% of all degrees? In fact Ceci&Williams showed that men in STEM are discriminated by a 2:1 ratio [2].
@JenniferHPhD @RFanciola @angie_rasmussen @dylanhmorris @Caroline_OF_B @MSNBC @CNN Disappointing to so supposed scientissts steeped in non scientific woke idealogy. Look at real data and stats. And stop supressing findings you dont like due to poltical bia
@Olaf_Koot @NadiaBouras Vrouwen. Gepamperde vrouwen. Waar 60% van ons onderwijsbudegt heengaat. https://t.co/rHupo8SohD
@lifetravelme @StaceyDooley Even hiring! surely men are favoured?! No national studies show women favoured 2:1 against identical men and men favoured in gender blind https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ its what happens when your fed 10,00000 guardian articles telling
@ana_bosslady @jadelimas_ @hfernandesbio Aliás @jadelimas_, já que você está por aqui curtindo, que tal dar uma olhada no que A Ciência andou dizendo sobre aquele assunto em que você tem opiniões tão científicas? https://t.co/5lRLmX64GI
@jadelimas_ @ana_bosslady @hfernandesbio @alencarlrv "Porque, ao contrário de você, nós dissemos opiniões baseadas em dados científicos." Ao contrário do que você pensa, a Ciência (TM) ainda não chegou a um consenso sobre isso. Veja, por exemplo, este art
@painfulbusiness @Amanhas50935590 @twcuddleston And yes ONS shows women are paid more than men in over 50 industries, and more for part time work and more until age 30... I guess they forget sexism? Also women are prefererd 2:1 over IDENTICAL men, gender b
@litgenstein @LordVulpesZerda @sciencemarchnyc @ladyxscience Well soon we wont be in STEm anymore. https://t.co/rHupo8SohD
@ajk_44 @BW_2012_origin Absolute nonsense. Good phds and profs are in short supply in STEM since they can all make a million in industry. We literally beg female candidates to take jobs, but they often don't for their own reasons. Yours is just a popular n
@JanieeAlm @KarinaVoggel Like with discrimination? https://t.co/rHupo8SohD
@KarenLa44046863 @KarinaVoggel Here is why: - public money is wasted on exclusive diversity parties - men are discrinated in job interviews and some countries even put up quotas in many ways: https://t.co/rHupo8SohD - we rarely do anything concrete agains
@overthefarmgate "Women are wonderful effect" harms men and women: https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ
@LisaBritton Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work than boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ,
@LisaBritton Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work than boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ,
@LisaBritton Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work than boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ,
@MyMeTooHealing Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work than boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJu
@clairlemon Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work than boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ,
@camisto Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work than boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ, gen
@OECDEduSkills Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work 2 boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ,
@LouisVolante Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work than boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ
@mj_bromley Teachers give higher marks to girls 4 identical work than boys https://t.co/gLydsiDma4 due 2 teacher gender bias/sexism. In work place, suprisingly women favoured 2:1 over IDENTICAL or even slightly more qualified men! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ,
@seanjcoughlan You wrote a BBC article on how teachers mark work by girls higher than identical boys. Well it goes into work too. Gender blind (dont know sex) recruitment helps men. Gender KNOWN recruitment FAVOURS WOMEN 2:1!! https://t.co/pmo3dnJuHJ
@ZimmermannTessa @stein_til @best_fail_ever @Segelwendel @katjaberlin Link habe ich ja schon versendet. Ist auch konsistent mit experimentellen Resultaten (https://t.co/kxKzMTnxZn) und jeder Statistik, die ich gesehen habe, entweder Frauen wurden bevorzugt
RT @sapinker: Shocker of a study: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. http://t.co/Q2M…
RT @sapinker: Shocker of a study: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. http://t.co/Q2M…
@JakobSachs1999 @Pocahontas_1024 @JessTries2Write @elonmusk Couldn't find actual study about physics hiring bias favoring women, IIRC~40%. But I found: https://t.co/fXghL8avlF https://t.co/GNLQThPGnf The classic of feminist BS, the orchestra blind test(199
@sciam "National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track" @PNASNews https://t.co/3MrGJ4JpSs
@mcfreeID @RebeccaSear There is a 2:1 faculty preference for women on #STEM #tenure track jobs: https://t.co/3MrGJ4JpSs
@voxdotcom Not true. https://t.co/wsDwjzLSK6
@manwhohasitall Because women have a 2:1 chance of securing a tenure-track position according to PNAS: https://t.co/3MrGJ4JpSs
@gilbergdk @AllanSchmidt @rasmus_dahl @StinaVrangElias Mere videnskabelig dokumentation om universiteterne - ikke artikler forfattet af journalister, der ikke ved, hvad de taler om... Kvinder har dobbelt så stor chance for at blive ansat. https://t.co/iX
RT @RationalMale: It was never about "equality"
RT @RationalMale: It was never about "equality"
RT @RationalMale: It was never about "equality" https://t.co/Yj42aaOEVT
RT @RationalMale: It was never about "equality" https://t.co/Yj42aaOEVT
@IslandGypsy68 @UN_Women If you are still in disbelief about the amount of liberation and "equality". https://t.co/wdBdzf931E
RT @ResplendentElk: @RationalMale "Results revealed a 2:1 preference for women by faculty of both genders across both math-intensive and no…
RT @RationalMale: It was never about "equality" https://t.co/Yj42aaOEVT
It was never about "equality"
@RationalMale "Results revealed a 2:1 preference for women by faculty of both genders across both math-intensive and non–math-intensive fields." The bias is in favor of women purely on the basis of gender. https://t.co/ovjRcANE9f
@Lilly @OlaySkin "Results revealed a 2:1 preference for women by faculty of both genders across both math-intensive and non–math-intensive fields." The bias is in favor of women purely on the basis of gender. https://t.co/ovjRcANE9f
@clgllmt @Juh488 @TheActMan_YT @D4rKtR00pR As has been said by others, affirmative action. Also, "National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track" (https://t.co/ecD2c7fPKc). Also, look at the insane cultural times w
@MogensJensenS @JBahrentz @danskungdom Det er 'interessant', at der øremærkes 400 mill. kr. til kvindelige forskere, når videnskaben ellers konkluderer, at kvindelige forskere ikke diskrimineres. Tværtimod. https://t.co/ncd89tJjU1 https://t.co/cNye7WboAX
@HeavyMetalWhelk Several studies, including recent ones, DO show a bias towards whites/men, others show none, and others show a bias in the opposite direction, e.g.: https://t.co/xBhlT6Ih2Q
@jaclynasiegel Women earn more college degrees then men. Women are more likely to be hired for faculty on STEM tenure track (2:1 - https://t.co/NSEoQy0rxH) We can’t assume that every disparate outcome implies disparate treatment that’s systemic.
@elgatosingenero Estudios posteriores no han observado discriminación o incluso la han visto a favor del hombre: https://t.co/YApefTFmzm
@PsynapseEU Women favored 2:1 in stem hiring (others studies have found similar results) https://t.co/RNzB8P0njW
@WKoevoet @RolandPierik @dewaremerijn @KimBoon94 @EvaVlaar @fvdemocratie Roland is geen prof, maar postdoc. Hopelijk wordt iig zijn carrière nog even de nek om gedraait door het huidige wanbeleid van positieve discriminatie, voor wij het de nek omdraaien m
@Leolucassen Waarom offert u uw professorschap niet op om plaats te maken voor een vrouw. In plaats van met discriminatie jegens jonge academici te koop te lopen. https://t.co/rHupo8SohD #durfechttedeugen
Wendy M. Williams and Stephen J. Ceci National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/vytWVCBgdc
@OlleFolke While the "leaky pipeline" is still a huge problem, it seems to be the case that women are more likely to be hired for tenure-track positions in STEM in a US context. If anything you'd expect the preference to be stronger in soc sci, right? http
@ALBredenoord @arendmeijer @D66 De resultaten uit het paper dat je noemt wordt in een later paper hier ook weer tegengesproken trouwens: https://t.co/1V5kERJx1v Nog lastig te beoordelen hoe het nu zit en welke relevantie dit heeft voor de Nederlandse situa
“Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1... with the exception of male economists, who showed no gender preference.” https://t.co/VXvARA0Fcd
RT @KatrineLoken: If the demand is not the problem, we should focus on supply and attrition of women in economics, during school, tenure tr…
@pewresearch 1⃣3⃣ Contrariamente às premissas prevalecentes, homens e mulheres do corpo docente da Biologia, Engenharia, Economia e Psicologia preferiram candidatas mulheres do que homens com qualificação idêntica com um rácio de 2:1. [EUA: 50 estados+D.C
@grant_mcdermott @KatrineLoken @jenniferdoleac @ShellyJLundberg Look closely at that bar chart folks... or read the abstract if you prefer. The 2015 study reveals a 2:1 respondent hiring preference for women... "with the single exception of male economist
If the demand is not the problem, we should focus on supply and attrition of women in economics, during school, tenure track system, etc. https://t.co/42PU7V1KyU
@MenaceInc ...high powered study, which showed a 2:1 hiring advantage for women in STEM fields: https://t.co/a7yksv8j8d
womenintech: Interesting! https://t.co/LMg8oaIdSI #B01Group
Interesting!
Most interesting: National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Thank you, @WomenofOB! @womenintech @WomeninSTEM @DiversitySTEM @NSERC_CRSNG @CIHR_IRSC https://t.co/d5LqYi2LzE
RT @stormkees: 4/9 Here's an important observation: /when/ they apply, female candidates in some cases are actually /more/ likely to be sel…
@agoodmanbacon @econ_emily iv) We have convincing, experimental evidence that the academy strongly prefers women: in audit studies, women are promoted at twice the rate for the same academic profile. It's not plausible that discrimination is the shaping fo
4/9 Here's an important observation: /when/ they apply, female candidates in some cases are actually /more/ likely to be selected. Clearly, both 'supply end' issues - related to the overall attractiveness of STEM careers - and hiring bias must be addressed
@KristiansBrain If they are aimed at everyone, then they aren't aimed at just you. By definition. And there's a lot of bias in hiring right now. Here's one example. https://t.co/Cj3BBSdLl6
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
I think the problem is that even you always banging on about genders at workplace. Work is work and for solid Christian man only sexual object is his wife the rest are brothers, sisters, colleagues, work mates. No contract is ever mentioned sex at work. No
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
@vgarciarivas @ledarville @Abebab It's very difficult to test such claims in a rigorous empirical fashion. Here's one way to do it compellingly (experimentally): https://t.co/KKLWfwoozw
National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track https://t.co/b5zkqQ69WD
RT @ResplendentElk: @clayroutledge @RationalMale It's tough being a lady in stem. "National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preferen…