@settantatreee @sommo_baglio95 @discodance17 @letipezz Stronzate, è esattamente il contrario https://t.co/1L36NJRQkr
@cosmic_kirby @WillofShodan2 @DomainDead @Grummz Read this one https://t.co/RtI5WMYzf9
@KJFlautist @uShanks_uDon @MsRebrand As for STEM, women may "feel" like they are in a "hostile" env. but their feelings aren't an accurate reflection of their liability. Women in STEM are HILARIOUSLY advantaged over men. As a man in STEM, I've seen this re
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
@abbygov Ironic... women get laughable preferential treatment at men"s expense in STEM fields & ARE STILL avoiding these fields like the plague. Is that bc "women are fragile & have toxic femininity" too? I'm sure that somehow you'll still blame me
@snackeriee @zeddo77 @partyfavrsforu @AMusingMoose @CarpeMortem13 "Less worse", women literally have preferential treatment in male fields & cunts like you are still whining. https://t.co/OVc2uq7JDe
@LittleKeegs0 @itsdelgiorno @atheistsquid @jasonjdelaney @besttrousers Similar 2015 study with much larger sample size found a strong bias in favor of women. https://t.co/GsuJeBa6IY
@RealCrowMagnum @LKrauss1 @skdh Some research finds the opposite, see for example https://t.co/NFT8zQmS7s. But it's dangerous. If you are a scientist and you need a job, it's convenient to avoid questioning the politically correct. “Studies” about race/g
@AndrewTimming Have you checked behind the sofa cushions? https://t.co/F8kzqK4Zza
@PhilEngoneer این هم یه رفرنس که به اون تحقیق رفرنس داده: https://t.co/yj2MPi77fR. من هم نمیگم لزوما بده! ولی این تبعیض وجود داشته.
@meteebee @arghavan_salles Shameless lying. https://t.co/SvnhRluT9Z
@liv3laffl0v3 @melliehellie42 @mxgbx Feminists routinely pushing for female exclusive rights & privileges, going so far as to advantage women over men in STEM hiring bc of some bogus "female oppression in male fields" narrative: https://t.co/e8In1i9UIw
@NicoleLBoivin @SpringerNature @JanetGHering While I acknowledge women have it worse than men when it comes to sexual crimes, a lot of the other downsides mentioned seem to be things men go through as well. Also why isn’t child bearing or the 2:1 faculty
@LaeriPatrizia @ellexxcom Disparate outcomes ≠ disparate treatment
@UrsiKeller Sexism, like racism, is bad for science in general. What’s also bad for science? Ideologically driven science that ignores other factors like child bearing or 2:1 faculty preferences in favor of women. Disparate outcomes ≠ disparate treatmen
@sentientist Not this again… Instead of looking at the snapshot in time, to understand dropout in STEM pipeline you have to track people over time (longitudinal study). Also studies have found women have an advantage when faced against equally qualified
Feminismo y ciencia, capítulo ochocientos https://t.co/dnUPzdBm68 https://t.co/4tAxJO6DlU
۳.خانمها راحت به گروه استاد مورد مورد نظرشون جوین میشن تا آقایون 👇 https://t.co/mM5CejwH3T
@ObhishekSaha And this was found in 2015 "National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track": https://t.co/gLlzqRiM2b
RT @wduyck: Voor al wie evidentiegebaseerd beleid voorstaat wordt het toch tijd dat genderacties die (ooit) begrijpelijk waren toch eens (h…
Voor al wie evidentiegebaseerd beleid voorstaat wordt het toch tijd dat genderacties die (ooit) begrijpelijk waren toch eens (her)bekeken worden. Zeker in onze universiteiten/hogescholen mag verwacht worden dat beleid onderbouwd is (specifiek onderzoek: ht
This isn’t the first report of female-bias in STEM fields. Faculty members show a 2:1 preference bias for hiring women over identically qualified men (https://t.co/VkRQBSXpC1): https://t.co/UNMMATgGdR
@ABShaheen115 @The_Eli_Beee @datepsych Right the women in STEM are just so oppressed aren't they? https://t.co/e8In1i9UIw
@retrosatananas @Heretic_Witch @awomaniswhen The main motivation is to increase women in stem overall by increasing the amount who study it, that doesn’t necessarily change hiring bias directly. Also there is some counter evidence to that. 1. https://t.co/
@retrosatananas @Heretic_Witch @awomaniswhen The main motivation is to increase women in stem overall by increasing the amount who study it, that doesn’t necessarily change hiring bias directly. Also there is some counter evidence to that. https://t.co/lzh
@jkhaapasa Ei taida olla ihan niin yksinkertaista. https://t.co/ZScm8z504D
@acweyand Now if any of that were true you might have a point. https://t.co/LVmOL7Pr05 https://t.co/soF4kUB71n https://t.co/Ac8kCPIZGZ https://t.co/NrQXqabvEC
@moutonnob @Oneiorosgrip @Arduino_jantje @tabularasaTonyB @SophieShay @vermithrax12 https://t.co/x9zBuxzYXZ Women are twice as likely to be hired in STEM jobs, so that's bullshit. Women's health gets way more funding than men's, and that's been known for
@HHandyDandy @alex_theos17 @TheActMan_YT Exactly. All the evidence proves that women are drastically advantaged in STEM. But keep shilling for the poor oppressed whamen. They have it so bad! :'( https://t.co/e8In1i9UIw
@bionic_slime @Loobycymru @DegenRolf It will never be enough. Even when they are advantaged in hiring as much as two to one in certain positions, these activists will still whine & complain about how "oppressed" they are. https://t.co/VWCi6PIq8a.
@MarkhamRisica @implisci @MushtaqBilalPhD This is one: https://t.co/1GFJqIF5Ct
@MicrobiomDigest On average men and women are treated differently. This sometimes favours men, & (athough taboo in prevailing dogma) sometimes favours women (see eg.article below). This is a question for studies & data to resolve, “calling out” doe
@Jacque_rainbow @Jorges_Fudges @CCriadoPerez @AbsolutelyVexed In STEM for examples, women get widely preferential treatment in hiring simply by virtue of being female, something I - as a power engineer - can personally attest to. The special treatment for
@ViparisOfficiel @VivaTech @wearesista Il n'y a aucune discrimination contre les femmes dans le monde de la tech. C'est tout le contraire. Cessez vos inepties et votre favoritisme envers les femmes et traitez les hommes de façon juste. https://t.co/RsbLMl
RT @maleadvocatewi1: However, I don't agree with idea of paid leave only for parents, since that's discrimination against single males who…
@remnantposting Or do this. https://t.co/XvkUAq70Ix
@Folklorikaz @M_Antonio_del_C @albertoortegana @bouenmatrix El problema de esto es que existe también mucha literatura que encuentra sesgos en la otra dirección. Que las mujeres tienen ventajas en la contratación y avance profesional. Hay que analizar a ev
RT @StudiesMale: https://t.co/RsbLMl1cM4 Men and women faculty members from all four fields (biology, engineering, economics, psychology)…
https://t.co/RsbLMl1cM4 Men and women faculty members from all four fields (biology, engineering, economics, psychology) preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles (single, married, divorced)
@amyalkon Everywhere in the Sciences, with the exception of Economics, is the same. With research finding a 2:1 preference for women (over identical men). Not sure if it was replicated... Will see it I can find a more recent one: https://t.co/s8FZyF5NZS h
@jagodamarinic @titiatscriptor @SilvaAtTwitta @PhilippHuebl @f_kess @ClaasGefroi @SZ Aktuelle Studien (hier nur Frauen als lead Autoren), finden einfach die Diskriminierung nicht (mehr), die für solche Annahmen nötig ist https://t.co/9TAvZsA4Vg https://t.c
@xMillenial_Momx @AlanLevinovitz And yet numerous studies have shown that women in stem are hired 2:1 over men. It’s feminist ideology making you “feel” this way, not the reality of the situation. https://t.co/7sGvP89soY.
@IZMartinez86 Sociology: https://t.co/2kNJrliAWJ Political Science: https://t.co/2YGqdrJo2C Psychology: https://t.co/mzz7Q54Obc Economics: similar results, writing article. Plus: 2:1 preference for hiring female scientists in women-atypical fields: ht
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
RT @grisasexual: Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de…
Las feministas se quejan que hay pocas mujeres enseñando en universidades. La realidad es que una mujer tiene EL DOBLE de posibilidades de ser contratada como profesora universitaria. Son los hombres los discriminados, las mujeres no quieren esos puestos
@carachisteguiri @Malnutridos 6/8 matemáticas). https://t.co/rvjqIYSTB6 O en relación a la educación, en este estudio se muestra un sesgo de los profesores de escuela a favor de las alumnas a la hora de evaluar: https://t.co/v1DV5bUvPk. Este otro estudio v
RT @GillesDeleuze17: Örneğin, STEM'e yönelik bir işe alım deneyinde, kadınlar erkeklere oranla 2:1 daha fazla tercih edilmiş. https://t.co/…
@jonasvlachos Se även: https://t.co/m783fkEkV7
RT @GillesDeleuze17: Örneğin, STEM'e yönelik bir işe alım deneyinde, kadınlar erkeklere oranla 2:1 daha fazla tercih edilmiş. https://t.co/…
RT @GillesDeleuze17: Örneğin, STEM'e yönelik bir işe alım deneyinde, kadınlar erkeklere oranla 2:1 daha fazla tercih edilmiş. https://t.co/…
RT @GillesDeleuze17: Örneğin, STEM'e yönelik bir işe alım deneyinde, kadınlar erkeklere oranla 2:1 daha fazla tercih edilmiş. https://t.co/…
RT @GillesDeleuze17: Örneğin, STEM'e yönelik bir işe alım deneyinde, kadınlar erkeklere oranla 2:1 daha fazla tercih edilmiş. https://t.co/…
RT @GillesDeleuze17: Örneğin, STEM'e yönelik bir işe alım deneyinde, kadınlar erkeklere oranla 2:1 daha fazla tercih edilmiş. https://t.co/…
RT @NapalmMsj: feministler mağduriyet yalanlarıyla sahte ağlarken, dişiler işe alımda ciddi şekilde sırf cinsiyetlerinden dolayı torpil gör…
feministler mağduriyet yalanlarıyla sahte ağlarken, dişiler işe alımda ciddi şekilde sırf cinsiyetlerinden dolayı torpil görüyor: 2:1 !! her liyakat düşmanı ( gayriresmi veya resmi ) bayan kotası bir erkeğin hakkının gasp edilmesidir ! https://t.co/zuU9my
Örneğin, STEM'e yönelik bir işe alım deneyinde, kadınlar erkeklere oranla 2:1 daha fazla tercih edilmiş. https://t.co/fzdCH10vrh https://t.co/8EqymcwolK
--"with the exception of male economists who show no gender preference"-- 1) Economics is the most valuable knowledge available to cog sci, psych, and sociology. 2) Learning econ exposes our biases and neutralizes them in our thinking. 3) Econ is necessar
@jordanbpeterson
Equality achieved 😅🙄 #feminism #equality #doublestandards #equity this is actually what modern day feminism considers equality. I signed up for 90s feminism, i didnt sign up for this.
@StefanFSchubert @SteveStuWill Perhaps the most frequent example I can think of is whenever outcomes l favor women like the 2:1 faculty preference in STEM. https://t.co/0g6MFN2V2A
@JACoates Most of the raised problems are right on point. Just that women are disadvantaged when it comes to hiring in academia is not true (any more). The opposite is the case nowadays. See here: https://t.co/2b4QgK2ihi
@skirmley @alamkara @emrazz @Observingstuf @Cas_And_Ra I'm sure that's true. Let's assume it is. So what? You'd have seen 1st hand that W make up a tiny % of these fields. Women are actively given preferential treatment in STEM fields yet they still choos
@cesarastudillo 8⃣ físico hacia su pareja ligeramente mayor en las mujeres. Tanto el profesorado masculino como el femenino prefirieron contratar a una mujer antes que a un hombre para profesores asistentes en cátedras de CTIM (ciencia,tecnología,ingenierí
@JaneCaro @IrregularPrune @JoLarkin @ozjohnd Yet women are preferred 2:1 as applicants in “traditionally male-dominated” careers such as STEM: https://t.co/YDlvfMAguj
@AmberAudio @DJWPLV @koooooooogs @kejames @AstroKatie From what I’ve seen in scientific journals. https://t.co/m783fkEkV7
@musclemonkeh @jzux @wolverine_mo That’s not even close to being true. Women have MASSIVE competitive advantages is STEM. https://t.co/IaM8bbSYqs
@E_Bonawitz I'm not sure evidence for such substantial bias at current time is as robust as you believe? Here are two studies and a review: https://t.co/o5tKN3OD8r https://t.co/UYELl07Qcc https://t.co/nfB1zZ1s9r We should absolutely no discriminate aga
Bunun iki olası nedeni var: 1- STEM'e başvuran kadınlar, erkeklere oranla daha başarılı olduğu için, iş teklifi alma olasılıkları daha yüksektir. 2- İse alımda kadınlar lehine bir önyargı bulunmaktadır. En bariz neden ikinci olasılık gibi gözüküyor. https
@tweetraychang Please post a link so we can see what they surveyed & how they crunched the numbers. White is still majority so 1st finding may be no surprise. 2nd claim doesn't jive with i.e. 2:1 hiring preference for women in STEM since 2015. https://
@Inkog9to @cabang_dk @marook @madsbrynnum Excellent choice. Kvinder i de naturvidenskabelige fag, hvor den woke narrative er at de bliver holdt ude og nede af "glaslofter"...Men narrativen er løgn og til skade for samfundet fordi vi ikke besætter stilling
@arealdishwasher @Pampanoboulos Since you need to be spoonfed, here is a study literally referenced in the paper National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track | PNAS (https://t.co/mUOSLhst29)
RT @MrGeorgeFrancis: Men have dominated science and academic research and the perceived wisdom is that this is caused by sexism. But some…
@Koolaiderr @12stoutst Couldn't find the exact study, bc it was from the 90s. but here you go: A study looking at discrimination against women in STEM instead found that women were preferred over men by a rate of 2:1. https://t.co/I7cWk7BGUt Stop spreadi
@Belentejuelas @SoniaTorito Cuando utilizas el "siempre" en una frase, con un solo contraejemplo se demuestra la falsedad de la frase. No creo que todos los hombres estén mejor que Ana Botín, por contraejemplo. https://t.co/xe1GpktZf2 https://t.co/cUHb8tO
Nothing is more terrifying to rich white women than the myth of their victimhood being exposed. https://t.co/DKL3789zbr
@hanbanbinbagman @thizbous @DavidTejiri @DoddNeve1 @millennial_core Literally 2:1 hiring preference for STEM faculty and there's a preference for other STEM jobs, that's what results mean https://t.co/ceDOFOXoWi. Ok fair enough and in GE countries, MORE wo