RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
We moeten discriminatie bestrijden. Tot zover ben ik het eens met @mboudry. Ik denk dat we daarmee al een heel eind verder komen. Ik ken *geen enkele* vrouwelijke STEM collega die niet met een licht ergerlijke tot zwaar schrijnende vorm van discriminatie
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
Beste Maarten, heb je de campagnewebsite grondig bekeken? Ik bedoel deze: https://t.co/idH1hk3l5K. Wat daar te lezen valt, is veel genuanceerder dan wat gisteren werd gecommuniceerd via andere kanalen. (tegelijkertijd: streven naar diversiteit mag/moet ove
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
Verhelderend draadje! 👇🏼#gender
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
Hopelijk deze keer eens GEEN transuniversitaire petitie en blijven we diversifieren met de UGent zoals met het moderne loopbaanmodel dat hardwerkende vrouwen toelaat te streven naar excellentie! #Ihaveneverfeltoffendedbybeingcalledhardworking #womenforexce
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, maar een perfect genderevenwicht is juist onmogelijk zonder discriminatie. Nu al zie je 2:1 voorkeur voor vrouwen in STEM-vacatures
RT @NAChristakis: @TriggerLoop @drugmonkeyblog I’m pretty sure you mean to impugn me. Not sure why. The topic of discrimination is importan…
RT @Marcel_Arts: @mxtherducker @JohnWit25604735 @UNESCO There is a 2:1 hiring bias in favour of women in STEM fields. https://t.co/j56uvylC…
@didbruyn @Stijn_Baert De aannames van de academie over discriminatie tijdens procedures doen wenbrauwen fronsen. Niemand stelt seksitische aannames in vraag. Ondertussen is er hard empirisch bewijs voor discriminatie van mannen https://t.co/eVDAyYG2yR
@mxtherducker @JohnWit25604735 @UNESCO There is a 2:1 hiring bias in favour of women in STEM fields. https://t.co/j56uvylC09 If fewer women apply, fewer women will get hired. The more gender-equal a country is, the more pronounced this effect is. More to
RT @NAChristakis: @TriggerLoop @drugmonkeyblog I’m pretty sure you mean to impugn me. Not sure why. The topic of discrimination is importan…
@TriggerLoop @drugmonkeyblog I’m pretty sure you mean to impugn me. Not sure why. The topic of discrimination is important and complicated and the evidence is vast and subtle. We would do well to consider it carefully. Here’s another well conducted study.
@whereisdaz 2 to 1 faculty preference for women in STEM- but let's not let that get in the way of Daz's moral high ground https://t.co/Q3hkVAVtTU
@manes These studies tend to show conflicting results. Besides, evidence of existing bias does not prove where bias come from. And as said, results conflicting. https://t.co/FOkJRYPEmk
@bcwf @notjosh @ekurutepe @uikonf Hmm...I try to change the nasty and specious verbiage and reasoning by challenging it. So thanks for your support! What evidence do you have that women, in general, are "overlooked" in tech? https://t.co/a7yksv8j8d
How many of us are prepared to re-evaluate received wisdom in the face of evidence?
RT @Anglian_Reed: @MowbrayRussell @Sangewya @brazenhussyrant @ekovisions @KenSimonSays @PoliticalKathy "National hiring experiments reveal…
@MowbrayRussell @Sangewya @brazenhussyrant @ekovisions @KenSimonSays @PoliticalKathy "National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track" https://t.co/Rc2Q4Wx7BC
@katiesscarlettt @Sangewya @brazenhussyrant @ekovisions @KenSimonSays @PoliticalKathy Convenient assumptions are not evidence of discrimination, and often conflict with reality. "National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM
@MichaelEddy And what about this? Ceci & Williams 2005 does seem to suggest male economists are quite rational: https://t.co/qHw6PFsPGF
@JaniceFiamengo See Ceci and Williams, 2015: Results revealed a 2:1 preference for women by faculty of both genders across both math-intensive and non–math-intensive fields, with the single exception of male economists, who showed no gender preference. htt
Il y a diverses études qui poussent l'estimation bayésienne de la discrimination dans des sens différents https://t.co/aE8JMnZdml
RT @SteveStuWill: ...or that the evidence bearing on the role of discrimination in shaping STEM gender gaps is decidedly mixed, with some s…
RT @SteveStuWill: ...or that the evidence bearing on the role of discrimination in shaping STEM gender gaps is decidedly mixed, with some s…
RT @SteveStuWill: ...or that the evidence bearing on the role of discrimination in shaping STEM gender gaps is decidedly mixed, with some s…
RT @SteveStuWill: ...or that the evidence bearing on the role of discrimination in shaping STEM gender gaps is decidedly mixed, with some s…
RT @SteveStuWill: ...or that the evidence bearing on the role of discrimination in shaping STEM gender gaps is decidedly mixed, with some s…
@ivanpuopolo Asiasta olen pitkälti samaa mieltä, mutta ”yhtä pätevät hakijat” on varsin teoreettinen tilanne. Valitsijaa kiinnostaa moni muukin asia kuin selkeästi mitattava pätevyys (usein sitäkin on vaikea mitata). Mielenkiintoinen asiaa liippaava tutk
@paulisageek @RachelRileyRR Well your daughter is in luck Paul. A 2015 study showed 2:1 employer bias against men in STEM fields https://t.co/eCFuUr51EC
Good time for women academics looking for a position https://t.co/p4gc9tangH
@KARLBERG_H Inom forskningen så brukar fenomenet kallas "female preference bias". Det är inte bara in skolan det finns, även när det kommer till anställningar måste män vara mer kompetenta än kvinnor för att anses som likvärdiga. Ex. https://t.co/HJ3c4Bt2X
@forganross I provided many links in the threads. The tenure claim is published here. https://t.co/4MTmL5IUJF. It's treated as a game, not by me, but by others who think that listing off as many publications as they can somehow invalidates the premise that
Исследование 2015 г,(371 универ/коледж из 50 штатов): в найме на научные должности в STEM у женщин есть привилегия. Сотни факультетов оценивали вымышленных кандидатов с равной квалификацией. Уклон в сторону женщин 2 : 1 по всем STEM наукам, кроме экономики
@curtrice Hi Curt, I was at your excellent lecture at ISMRM in Paris this past June and it really affected my thinking..wondered what you thought of this study https://t.co/Tyfj4gOZO1
@NatureNews @RrrichardZach 1. The study doesn't look at the rate at which women leave other fields in comparison to men. 2. The study references the 'laboratory manager' study of 2012 of Moss-Racusin et alia, when a more recent, broader, and larger study
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
Great news. https://t.co/Q2lWzjPEuO
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
@NatureNews National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. https://t.co/SUJtYVb1Q2
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
Must be! Minimum "Nazi"!
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
RT @GadSaad: Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propagan…
Oh, oh. This is clearly "Nazi hate facts." The two authors must be leaders of the patriarchy trying to spread false propaganda about the gender bias in STEM fields. Must not question the victimology narrative. https://t.co/NNC3eZi8BJ
RT @Sebastian_JKT: "Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1…
@KCJdR @NadineBoke Beetje laat, maar met het opruimen van oude literatuur kwam ik deze tegen: https://t.co/4LaTd4wfKV Gaat specifiek over academia in de VS, maar ik vermoed dat veel andere plekken vergelijkbaar zijn.
RT @CHSommers: @seanmcarroll There is good evidence of female advantage in hiring https://t.co/qtpDb8DdqE Much of the research claiming…
RT @CHSommers: @seanmcarroll There is good evidence of female advantage in hiring https://t.co/qtpDb8DdqE Much of the research claiming…
@seanmcarroll There is good evidence of female advantage in hiring https://t.co/qtpDb8DdqE Much of the research claiming stereotype threat and implicit bias has been debunked. https://t.co/RnKeqk7uYV Appears women, as a group, somewhat less interested
@professor_dave @toadmeister I prefer to not speak to Strumia’s presentation as there is no audio to give objective context to his slides. However, your claim there are no stats that show men are at a disadvantage in STEM is demonstrably false. https://t.c
Interesting read. https://t.co/3LHuMfMNGR
Jennifer What's wrong with Williams #STEM #hiring #bias study that found #women #preferred 2:1 over #men 4 #tenured #faculty with equal #qualifications? Is fem. under representation demand or supply side bias? @JennyRohn @Revkin https://t.co/LCR6xYYXc4 ht
@seanmcarroll Why don't you write a blog post that attempts to directly address his actual arguments? Or offer to debate him? And why don't you mention any of Ceci & Williams' work? It's very inconvenient for your position: https://t.co/Naus7rBd37
@dorigo @CERN Does your soon-to-be-presented answer address things like this? https://t.co/qvybQ8lKtH https://t.co/ghoaQNky4x
@DrAnneCarpenter @Phil_Gooch @DanielAcree1 @seanmcarroll @JamesADamore Thanks. I know the Moss-Racusin. You'll be familiar with others such as Williams & Ceci. I guess the question is what's the full picture here (I'm familar with criticism of W-C, btw
• Universities are dominated by women (57%-43% by UG/PG numbers). • Most disciplines (law, medicine, psych., social sciences, humanities, etc.) are dominated by women. • Measurable gender bias (preferential treatment & hiring) is anti-male. https://t.
RT @jon_d_morrow: Surprising! National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Carpe deim, ladies!…
RT @jon_d_morrow: Surprising! National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Carpe deim, ladies!…
Surprising! National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Carpe deim, ladies! It's a good time to take your shot. https://t.co/7zmUOkSlqc
@gordondev @timevansphd @Erickish10 @doc_becca @PratherLab "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launching careers in academic science. Messages to the contrary may discourage women from applying for STEM (science, technology, engineerin
@beeb_13 @GomerBlog Wow. Holy selection bias on that one. I'm not buying it. (the other one is a bit more convincing) But let's look at female PhD hires (pay not listed but hired = paid, not hired = no pay) https://t.co/DN3vzo5xr0 https://t.co/jNwSHUQg
@timevansphd @Erickish10 @doc_becca @PratherLab Have you read these? #2 is a peer-reviewed study showing bias *in favour* of women in STEM https://t.co/Lej3Sx6uwV (The rest are mostly links to advocacy groups, newspapers; not original research.)
@seis_matters @Stephen_Curry @wrenmontgomery Tbh the effort might also be at the wrong end, studies show there is already a strong female hiring preference in STEM areas https://t.co/gMOGaBTOaz therefore the problem is less with the hiring phase and more t
@ashotinthearm @Banned_Ali @HPluckrose Merely a suggestion right? https://t.co/kDf1BBg51L https://t.co/1LwQ8XzzQb
@BadBadams @scumjones @_Saeen_ @uberfeminist Yes and no. He's not arguing for quotas or affirmative action, the latter of which exists in abundance for POC/women already. The research also doesn't support the contention the way most people think. https://
@MCrowderMeyer I would think so. It's a big visible signal. I would like to underline, by way of contrast: https://t.co/N3A6lFn1dQ TT hiring favoring women in STEM fields (2015). https://t.co/VzjXi8Mr2G TT hiring favoring men in psychology (1999).
@eclectic_evntde @mjaeckel @msbehavingbrain Here is a link to the paper showing anti-woman discrim in STEM: https://t.co/hHZguMu2yD Here is a methodologically much stronger paper showing 2:1 bias FAVORING women in faculty STEM hiring (figure shows 1 reason
@ScrmngBanana Here an official article (one of many! i might add). Now shut the fuck up :) https://t.co/BNajCQW1Nh
RT @emulenews: "National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track" https://t.co/YCJzrf2OYP via https…