@fjaeril_ @LBrynvall @AnjaLSundberg @noren_elisabeth Instämmer i detta. Det kan göra ganska stor skillnad, i synnerhet om man som i detta fall sitter tillsammans i ett ganska litet rum i över en timme. Du kan läsa om det här, @LBrynwall: https://t.co/yVY7
@reality_burst @RWittenbrink Daher trägt man ja auch FFP2 und nicht nur OP-Maske. Im übrigen ist der Schutz bei Omicron sogar etwas besser.
RT @trishgreenhalgh: I don't often use this term, but the Bagheri et al paper on mask efficacy is a game changer. Brilliantly summarised by…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
@ChrisFerdinandi @mattbc @MassGenBrigham wearing surgical mask over an N95 CAN compromise the seal. I contacted @ericashenoy noting: "Do NOT wear NIOSH-approved respirators...With other masks or respirators" https://t.co/KXrPvDwsLn https://t.co/78rMwD3k0z
@KasparsMelkis Pie pareizas vilkšanas kontaminācija samazinās. To rāda pētījumi viens pēc otra. Kur var tik tupi rakstīt un domāt. Nākamreiz, ja nonāksiet operāciju zālē, tad arī pasakiet, lai Jūs operē bez maskām. Neko taču nedod, ne? https://t.co/4RmGNjb
@goddeketal Take care when relying on the 'experts' who are too busy to use their critical thinking skills. Up your science game here: https://t.co/mi8iBj7UGY https://t.co/i8tKfvGWnb
@DactiloSteno @elisarojasm Je comprends rien à l'anglais, ça dit quoi là ? https://t.co/JRSYT0TQKZ
@GwennPetrichor Cette étude le prouve. https://t.co/ZNPaDwM4wP
@frdaigne @ago_bri Autre étude, plus récente, sur l’efficacité des masques FFP2. https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@FractalUnivers Tenez ⤵️ https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh
@WLegitan @Wulle_Gui Cette étude montre que le FFP2 est efficace. https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh
@mbk28 Non ! Un masque FFP2 bien porté est efficace. https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh https://t.co/H5D4X4z8L8
@Grizzlyman21000 Si ! Un masque FFP2 bien porté est efficace. https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh Sinon, il n’y a plus de liberté quand on vit avec un #LongCovid comme moi depuis plus de 3 ans. C’est la maladie qui dicte notre vie. https://t.co/pFe8Np7UU0
@fscotto Un FFP2 bien porté est efficace. https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh https://t.co/WpXFbZ6J9q
@RaoulVo49176831 Je porte un masque FFP2, pas un chirurgical. Et, bien évidemment, je me lave les mains régulièrement depuis toujours ! https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh https://t.co/6MBDwSJsCC
@frdaigne Cette étude prouve l’efficacité des FFP2. https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh
@HetMasteen2 @frdaigne Toujours le même recueil dont on peut débunker une à une les études. Un FFP2 bien porté est efficace. https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh
@DjaonBea Et pourtant ⤵️ https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh
@DjaonBea @frdaigne L’étude ⤵️ https://t.co/ZNPaDwLwHh
@Nerdy_Yarn_Lady @scribecheck Your attitude is a danger to me and everyone else. Two-way masking is substantially more effective than one-way; we can quantify how much and the difference is startling. https://t.co/7iOdcIxPkF
@JimAdam79655029 @SusieNoonan2 That is not true. This study found, in instances of a person with the virus talking to another uninflected participant, one way masking with an FFP2 protected against infection with 80% reliability, while 2 way masking increa
@KristenMeghan @hartman_bill So you should know that N95 and equivalent masks are effective at reducing transmission of the virus. https://t.co/qsbp6PmxoX
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
@Lucyburne1 If you appreciate science I suggest you do your own research in a scientific manner. I hate scientific papers, but I will dig them up on rare occasions. https://t.co/62Z5E2evAg https://t.co/k3eumjhDsV https://t.co/z9MiIeiESc https://t.co/xRw997
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
@kevinnbass @Parsifaler @CDCDirector Can somebody please review variables such as distance, air movements, human size/volume, particle density, mask fit, etc. and then make these accusations? Can't get any serious takers. https://t.co/i8tKfvGWnb
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Inf…
@Pflegeherz12 Weil es, wie Sie sagen, immer wieder aufs Neue Not tut zu betonen, wie sehr gut sitzende FFP2/N95 das Infektionsrisiko reduzieren, hier ein paar Links zu entsprechenden Studien. https://t.co/YtfktcxQJe https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/
RT @lgoshen: @robinsoped101 Here is a useful article on the risk associated with many different masking scenarios and types of masks: https…
@robinsoped101 Here is a useful article on the risk associated with many different masking scenarios and types of masks: https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
RT @thalesnemo: @JeffBullard16 @alexmeshkin 1/3👉🏻Another factually wrong comment! MASKS WORK IT IS BASIC PHYSICS! Better masks such as N95…
RT @thalesnemo: @Liberalism2021 @JEVLloyd OMG more unlettered and unscientific babble! #MaskUp #COVIDisAirborne ➡️https://t.co/wBRUXr1xWw…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@phealthsean @TaylorLorenz @instagram after extended periods (1+ hours) chance of infection increases to about 20%, at least according to this study https://t.co/iFMZOCRuO5
@Leftychris2 @AltenbergLee @CMClase The efficacy is lower when not sealed, but still much better than surgical mask. In fact you get most of the way there already by adjusting the metal nosepiece. https://t.co/WM1BmUmrDO https://t.co/DC4EwIwgww
@jonkay Btw, N95s are up to 75 times more effective than surgical masks. https://t.co/Pt87BZZOGC
@Liberalism2021 @JEVLloyd OMG more unlettered and unscientific babble! #MaskUp #COVIDisAirborne ➡️https://t.co/wBRUXr1xWw ➡️ https://t.co/1lQpmC7hJN ➡️ Number 53 droplet /aerosol experiment in UK parliament -1905 https://t.co/ypbMRPlg9r ➡️Super spreader st
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@cayman_luck @chantz_y Educate yourself it’s basic physics !
@ultimate_wave >夜道でエロい格好していて.. この例はあてはまりません。 『エロい格好』で相手に危害を及ぼすことはありませんが、ノーマスクはウイルスを保持している場合、相手を感染させる危険性があります。 >マスクに感染症予防効果が... マスクはウイルス曝露を抑制します。 https://t.co/Am47zK9wVJ
@T_F_L_1776 @MeetJess PURE BULLSHIT ! With RR less than 2 this study is indistinguishable from statistical noise ! It beggars all credulity THAT A PHYSICAL BARRIER LOWERS THE AMOUNT OF INOCULANT! https://t.co/oyS8IcVCPd https://t.co/GOnbJU2dmK
@RickS9115 They certainly do, numerous studies have proven it. And it's quite a walker move to tell someone vulnerable to "focus on the immune system" 🖕 🚀 https://t.co/NbTXrd9ORs
@stkirsch @ProfTimNoakes OMG! What a pure BULLSHIT PAPER! MASKS WORK IT IS BASIC PHYSICS ! 👉🏻Busted masks ( no cutoff of oxygen)[ voice of thunder] https://t.co/6Dek2qtzWD Doctor wears six face masks NO oxygen decrease https://t.co/1z7bVqoa7h
@JeffBullard16 @alexmeshkin 1/3👉🏻Another factually wrong comment! MASKS WORK IT IS BASIC PHYSICS! Better masks such as N95 works better ! Naturally that means that people who exhibit the abilities of locomotion & respiration WEAR A MASK, & CORRECTL
@DowdEdward Time for some real science. For your consideration: "An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles". https://t.co/i8tKfvGWnb
@mattbc Source: "after 1 h, but, when both wear a well-fitting FFP2 mask, it [SARS2 infection risk] is 0.4%" [https://t.co/Y3HIAn7MKn]
@paddleplr @MCM5432 MASKS WORK! It’s basic physics ! Impact of community masking on COVID-19: A cluster-randomized trial in Bangladesh https://t.co/XkE9AVTUZe ➡️https://t.co/U3W3h6lEiV ➡️ https://t.co/wBRUXr1xWw ➡️ https://t.co/8yZEs6b3sh ➡️ https://t.co/
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
Aus der Conclusio bezügl. RCTs (s.o.) einzelne Studien dazu: Calculated an upper bound on the exposure/risk of infection between two individuals in the near-field and short ( <1 h) exposure duration with different masking and social distancing scenarios
@Ks_is_back_ Ne, Masken gibt es wirklich, und sie schützen sogar 😉
@BricePierlot @panda_sombre @dr_l_alexandre @CaudeHenrion Bah si les études existent. Encore une fois tu aurais lu la littérature scientifique et pas Twitter tu n’affirmerais pas une connerie pareil. Un exemple d’une étude disant l’inverse de toi : https:/
@OpenSeaon007007 @McMasterU @machealthsci @McMasterIIDR That’s not a FFP2/FFP3/N95 mask it’s a surgical mask to protect from droplet spread: not airborne #covidisairborne Gholamhossein Bagheri 2/12/21 PNAS https://t.co/tlDzufR1bh Here’s a good round up
@schwichtenberg_ @Krankenpflegel Falsch. Masken schützen. https://t.co/NbTXrd9ORs
@artistaalchemia @Krankenpflegel @GangolfSchrimpf Apropos Wissenschaft... https://t.co/NbTXrd9ORs
@AndyStraus1 @Krankenpflegel Stimmt so nicht. Siehe Studienlage. #MaskenSchützen #FFPstattFDP #MaskUp https://t.co/NbTXrd9ORs
@H_W_i_f_F Studien, die die Wirksamkeit belegen, gibt es natürlich: https://t.co/coEFUUr1QP
@XZY2bsdoebacku1 @VladVexler That's uninformed bollox
@Soulgirl1RN @ClarkeMicah @MailOnline I'm in no position to judge the matter - there are pre-Covid studies which appear to show benefits of masks in relation with influenza. for instance https://t.co/k5l97DrZpL Also studies during Covid: https://t.co/Q1a
@AusBine @Zwiebelninja Glauben Sie nicht mir, lesen Sie es selbst. 2/2 https://t.co/5nMbVYfwtF
@RicoGoth @EricBillyFR @wargonm Vous savez que les fibres sont en 3D ? Et que la probabilité de rencontre d’un fibre est de 100% dans l’épaisseur du masque. L’électrostatique fait le reste. Cela dit il suffit de voir l’efficacité des masques contre la COV
@carriepricecox3 @PenGwenWithLC @MayoClinic @MLevantovskaya Reminds me of a Laozi quote: "Knowing ignorance is strength. Ignoring knowledge is sickness." Ignoring knowledge isnt helpful, so here's some knowledge. "after 1 h, but, when both wear a well-f
@goddeketal @mmpadellan @realDonaldTrump No one yet has refuted this study, that I'm aware of. You all should be aware that there is not a consensus on your opinion. "An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles" https:
@The_Avenger178 @SHomburg Anbei eine weitere Studie zum Schutz durch die Maske: https://t.co/KgZv6crNF2
@Schwebebahnfahr @ZivaDavid78 @BMauschen @hexaOrthorexia "minimal" - "1 h, but, when both wear a well-fitting FFP2 mask, it is 0.4%" https://t.co/ixXq1w0xDI Ist das *physikalische!* Ergebnis = Labor: Nach 580h ist das kumulative Risiko 99,9% Im Alltag ist
@seattlechildren Here's a good study on various masking scenarios. The KN95 masks (equivalent to the FFP2 masks in the study) are a far better option than the baggy blue surgical masks. https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
@Dyakiv Когда бахилы сравнивают с масками в ковид, то хочется в такое посмотреть: https://t.co/uSrr8taxoJ https://t.co/7qao89NRaS Я, если честно, понял из этого всего нихуя примерно. Но просто хочется посмотреть что кто-то хоть что-то посчитал и потом бум
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@drcole12 Dr. Cole, for your consideration: https://t.co/i8tKfvGWnb
RT @HuffmanLabDU: 4/ With no masks & only distancing (3 m), 90% risk of infection. "When both wear a surgical mask, while the infectious i…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: 5/ They also looked at the effect of fit on TIL (total inward leakage). "By simply adjusting the mask nosepiece to the n…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: 4/ With no masks & only distancing (3 m), 90% risk of infection. "When both wear a surgical mask, while the infectious i…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@SGeysenbergh @GevaertThomas @Domus_Medica De combinatie van verschillende maatregelen is altijd beter, maar 'in die context' maakt het wel een verschil en dat is ook aangetoond op menselijke proefpersonen: https://t.co/dFZeJW3kfK
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @ValeBodi: An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles: “We find a very low risk of infection when e…
An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles: “We find a very low risk of infection when everyone wears a face mask, even if it doesn’t fit perfectly on the face.” https://t.co/Z86SGVAXen
@peterschwethelm @danaparish @kprather88 @CollignonPeter Surgical mask and face shield don't protect as well as N95 masks because N95 masks are actually designed to block aerosols. I'm sure the shield is fine... but aerosols float around the shield, just
@novkun2 @eroerosan8308 @ifeelyou2020 じゃあこちらも読んでみてください。 元の論文も貼り付けておきます。 https://t.co/ODVfm6EJDA https://t.co/1oGvBnsnGM