↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 105,279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2021
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2110117118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gholamhossein Bagheri, Birte Thiede, Bardia Hejazi, Oliver Schlenczek, Eberhard Bodenschatz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22,167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Other 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 49 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Engineering 13 8%
Physics and Astronomy 6 4%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 56 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11010. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2024.
All research outputs
#143
of 26,588,548 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3
of 105,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 530,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1
of 827 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,548 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 827 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.