@MEUNIERPatric11 @silvano_trotta Vous avez déjà lu une étude scientifique, en général? https://t.co/iPVTIo6jDP Vous savez où en trouver? https://t.co/nkrRC8JmTe Spoiler: C'est pas sur C8! https://t.co/2683teGZpf
@CollignonPeter According to a very good study of the Max Planck institute, they estimate protection of a well fitting mask in the higher 90s% for 20 min exposure. https://t.co/TzECb1ceF2
@aZZitai @Dt_Aerzteblatt Ja. Ist durch zahlreiche internationale Studien belegt. z.B. https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
@Immetjes @Eliesie1 Je hebt gelijk: het lijkt er op dat ik me een rekenmodel herinner. Ik denk dat dit de studie was die ik me herinner namelijk: https://t.co/BZGJHyfi34 https://t.co/8XZDpj8kB6
RT @johahof: @Jo_Hanna_Jo @andfra9 @Dana_Maresa_ @Sebastian_hurra @Waldhexe6 Ja, das war die Studie, die ich meinte! https://t.co/1xJ4tHShAg
@Jo_Hanna_Jo @andfra9 @Dana_Maresa_ @Sebastian_hurra @Waldhexe6 Ja, das war die Studie, die ich meinte! https://t.co/1xJ4tHShAg
RT @andfra9: @johahof @Jo_Hanna_Jo @Dana_Maresa_ @Sebastian_hurra @Waldhexe6 Ich vermute, das basiert auf der Arbeit von Bagheri, Bodenscha…
@johahof @Jo_Hanna_Jo @Dana_Maresa_ @Sebastian_hurra @Waldhexe6 Ich vermute, das basiert auf der Arbeit von Bagheri, Bodenschatz et al. Die wahrscheinlich umfassendste Studie zur Maskenwirkung, mit theoretischen *und* experimentellen Daten. https://t.co/PB
@odrobsed @nicolasberrod @le_Parisien Bonne lecture https://t.co/OKvMk6Q6SP
@DooooC15 @FLAHAULT Je pense qu'1 education au FFP2 est utile même si @EberhardBodens1 @BagheriMos et al ont montré qu'1 FFP2 mal mis fait beaucoup mieux qu'1 chirurgical. Mais bien mis on y gagne, et c'est SIMPLE (cf vidéo ou schemas de mon tweet ⬆️ https
RT @lgoshen: @unbekannt799 @ParticleDude @JoStowasser Ein paar Beispiele, aber es gibt wirklich viele Masken-Studien, die die Wirksamkeit b…
@unbekannt799 @ParticleDude @JoStowasser Ein paar Beispiele, aber es gibt wirklich viele Masken-Studien, die die Wirksamkeit belegen. Auch Grundprinzipien der Physik - is ja keine Rocket Science. Sie können einfach auf Pubmed schauen. 1. https://t.co/4KyOA
@Fynnderella1 Much more appropriate study: An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles https://t.co/i8tKfvGWnb
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@watkinson137 @JeromeAdamsMD @jabathut You get most of the way there already by adjusting the metal nosepiece. Tape is better but risk reduction is large already without it. https://t.co/WM1BmUmrDO https://t.co/tDBIuo3qdy
@parashotz @JeromeAdamsMD @StewMama71 That is from 2020. Since then, dozens of studies have proven the efficacy of masks in preventing the spread of SARSCoV2. It appears you haven't bothered to keep up with research. Here's an article on efficacy of variou
RT @trishgreenhalgh: I don't often use this term, but the Bagheri et al paper on mask efficacy is a game changer. Brilliantly summarised by…
RT @carol_perelman: Estudio🇩🇪 encontró q uso de KN95 o FFP2 bien ajustado da la mayor proyección✅ Mientras q uso de 😷 quirúrgico por 20 mi…
RT @carol_perelman: Estudio🇩🇪 encontró q uso de KN95 o FFP2 bien ajustado da la mayor proyección✅ Mientras q uso de 😷 quirúrgico por 20 mi…
RT @lgoshen: @JacksonJam50990 @LadyDoctorSays I'm not going to do research for a person who calls me a "fucking moron" and believes that pe…
@JacksonJam50990 @LadyDoctorSays I'm not going to do research for a person who calls me a "fucking moron" and believes that peer review is "corrupted." That's insulting to me and my profession. But because I'm a nice person, here is an excellent study on e
@mk_nomask 本当にマスク時の飛沫の動態などが知りたいのであれば、 https://t.co/coenspjbqF おすすめですよ
required but WOULD return if you institute some clinic dates/times with masks required for all donors and staff. On the phone, your nurse reassured me that I could wear a mask but one-way masking is nowhere near as safe or effective as universal masking.
RT @MASk90098257: @KristenMeghan @chantz_y Even a simple surgical mask reduces infection by more than 1%. I have no idea where you're getti…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: 2/ The authors perform "upper bound" analyses to get around complexities in modeling risk. "We conclude that wearing app…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@sadfoodman @Lizzardo77 https://t.co/WrsqTcAB6A An N95 can only seal properly if the rubber bands are one above the ears and the other below the ears, this has to do with the dissolution of the forces. If you put a procedure mask over it, it can give press
@AlisaValdesRod1 Do these people wear their 95s properly?
RT @MASk90098257: on a N95 and the Total Inward Leakage drops. (Image source: https://t.co/WrsqTcAB6A ) So now this FFP2 is at 94% effectiv…
@Schnabelobst Wirksamkeit Maske https://t.co/VfFXN8OucE
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@keetmuise Source: https://t.co/tGYqM6c2hf
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
If your individual choices in this case actually only affected you, I could respect that choice. But we know one-way masking is not as effective as everyone masking. ( https://t.co/ZcEKIv5ygv… )
RT @HuffmanLabDU: 4/ With no masks & only distancing (3 m), 90% risk of infection. "When both wear a surgical mask, while the infectious i…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: 5/ They also looked at the effect of fit on TIL (total inward leakage). "By simply adjusting the mask nosepiece to the n…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@raspberry_moon1 https://t.co/AYdh3l8gGF 新聞記事ね。 https://t.co/afiSXMo4u3 記事内の論文ね
RT @lgoshen: @EvaHehemann @Karl_Lauterbach Meinen Sie Homburg, der einen Cochrane-Artikel falsch interpretiert hat? Tut mir leid, dass Sie…
RT @lgoshen: @EvaHehemann @Karl_Lauterbach Meinen Sie Homburg, der einen Cochrane-Artikel falsch interpretiert hat? Tut mir leid, dass Sie…
@EvaHehemann @Karl_Lauterbach Meinen Sie Homburg, der einen Cochrane-Artikel falsch interpretiert hat? Tut mir leid, dass Sie durch Homburgs Desinformationskampagne in die Irre geführt wurden. Wenn Sie daran interessiert sind, wie Masken funktionieren, hi
@HansMahncke @tracybeanz First at least know science. https://t.co/i8tKfvGWnb
@shiharasiri 正気ですか?マスクの有効性の文献はlancetはじめ検索すれば沢山ありますよ?一例ですがどうぞ。富嶽でのシミュレーションも。 https://t.co/h0XLu6XcMR https://t.co/drfYr1HuSw https://t.co/iqI33iRZK1 富嶽シミュレーション https://t.co/51JTLIikwQ
@KristenMeghan @chantz_y Even a simple surgical mask reduces infection by more than 1%. I have no idea where you're getting the numbers from. https://t.co/WrsqTcAB6A https://t.co/pL5ElWCJxE
@JoeExot42351199 @TorontoPolice Masks work and science says so. Especially respirators. They are not the problem. This person could have used a scarf in the same way, are you going to ban scarfs and hats ?! https://t.co/3CH3oRUceb
@ModelAyshaMirza @Jordan666Ann @MandateMasksNY Maybe this could help. https://t.co/i8tKfvGWnb
@QuillRKukla @danieljhicks @Helenreflects I thought it was widely acknowledged that one-way masking was effective? Modelling studies have shown it significantly drops the risk of infection with encounters with people unmasked. Obviously if both are masked
RT @lgoshen: @CLFMomof7 @morgfair @HarttandSoul You're wrong. Sorry that you were misled by people who are anti-science. But numerous peer-…
@CLFMomof7 @morgfair @HarttandSoul You're wrong. Sorry that you were misled by people who are anti-science. But numerous peer-reviewed scientific studies show that masks are very effective at preventing Covid infections. Here is one that you should read so
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@lavawitch @dreamboating @1goodtern Also https://t.co/7iOdcIxPkF models the use of recipient-only masking vs two-way masking. It concludes that transmission rate from an infected unmasked person to someone 1m away wearing a well-fitted FFP2 can be up to 30
@eDreQ58iT3QDaUG @s_lhbmr @gute012 @yamikawadays そもそも自分はフェイク新聞に騙された恥ずかしさを隠すのに必死な時点でお話にならないwマスクで低酸素や老けるって全国の歯科医や外科医に対する冒とくでしかないわ(笑)。https://t.co/PEM4N6n6Bd
RT @HuffmanLabDU: 4/ With no masks & only distancing (3 m), 90% risk of infection. "When both wear a surgical mask, while the infectious i…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@hutchleah This study will bring you some comfort. 💚 QRT ID: Figure from linked study showing relative protection of various mask configurations, including unadjusted/poor fitting high filtration respirators, which still perform admirably compared to alte
RT @MASk90098257: on a N95 and the Total Inward Leakage drops. (Image source: https://t.co/WrsqTcAB6A ) So now this FFP2 is at 94% effectiv…
@MysticMaestro42 @lepke2112 @andrew_wallace8 @Jordan666Ann @PlotACourse @PeterHotez @AKA_RealDirty Less than 1% is incorrect. https://t.co/xt94G560Bd https://t.co/tGRx5ouVMS
RT @Musician1980: #Masken als wichtige Mitigationsmaßnahme https://t.co/gT2wRjbkLp
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@HandanoHeishi @saikyoukawauso @jinpeiishii @cobta 飛沫感染のみならず空気感染においてのマスク使用に伴う感染リスクの減少について研究したものになります。 "正しく"マスクを装着した場合のサージカルマスクおよびN95マスクの有用性についてまとめてあります。(場合によってはソーシャルディスタンスがゴミなことも) https://t.co/qR3nFKp8sJ
RT @mimiryudo: Sans chercher du tout à être exhaustif chez @bmj_latest @PNASNews... - https://t.co/q48X6cPTgA - https://t.co/TzGUxTYZMp -…
@zeekamp77 @Shade90z https://t.co/xYgWXNxPne Here's a study that reached a much different conclusion, but that's filtering droplets, not particulate matter. I'm confused why you care at all what other people do. Does it offend you?
RT @AsadoriQ: 2021年末の論文。マックスプランクの流体系。 ・マスクは距離より有効。 ・全員がマスクをするとフィットが甘くてもリスクはとても低くなると。ただしオミクロン前。 https://t.co/FrvfkVFOVS
Masks work #MaskUp Better masks…work better: An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles | PNAS https://t.co/jR5CVa9ldJ
RT @AsadoriQ: 2021年末の論文。マックスプランクの流体系。 ・マスクは距離より有効。 ・全員がマスクをするとフィットが甘くてもリスクはとても低くなると。ただしオミクロン前。 https://t.co/FrvfkVFOVS
2021年末の論文。マックスプランクの流体系。 ・マスクは距離より有効。 ・全員がマスクをするとフィットが甘くてもリスクはとても低くなると。ただしオミクロン前。 https://t.co/FrvfkVFOVS
マスクの効果は、証明されている。 https://t.co/gTHPNsfPFM
@TamraArmistead @19joho Especially when evidence like this exists. "... after 1 hour, but, when both wear a well-fitting FFP2 mask [like a KN95 or higher], it [SARS2 infection risk] is 0.4%" [6] (December 2021)" [https://t.co/e7Hdv8Akqf]
@liz_churchill10 @JordanSchachtel A face diaper, seriously? When science? https://t.co/i8tKfvGWnb An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@HaxMax18 @Frau_Mueller2 @MichaNeuhaus Aber falls dich Studien dazu interessieren, gerne hier einlesen, vorausgesetzt du reagierst nicht gleich allergisch weil der Tweet vom Volksverpetzer kommt: https://t.co/9l7fwarEjd
@JohnCallister14 @HeyNurseKat @Sharky_vs_Evil @AnnaSova17 @jonathanstea A study from Princeton, just one of any number of studies with armfuls of data. Not, of course, that you will understand a word of it but that is not my problem. https://t.co/OEjitA96r
@ishifly @Tanosimi3500 @COBSSR @hijump_hijump 日付しか読んでなくて草 マスクが有効という論文ならいくらでもヒットするやろ https://t.co/2n1T6MxMQy
RT @lgoshen: @dom_ma @ToshiAkima @YouAreLobbyLud A piece of double-sided medical or cosmetic tape on the nose bridge can make earloop masks…
@dom_ma @ToshiAkima @YouAreLobbyLud A piece of double-sided medical or cosmetic tape on the nose bridge can make earloop masks a bit better, as shown in this study, which evaluated both nonadjusted and adjusted (with tape) earloop FFP2 masks: https://t.co/
@jenn_angelheart @amandalhu @AHS_media tell the friend to have a look at : https://t.co/j6bphjyNob https://t.co/WbblocZv9b https://t.co/cEmpPC8YYk