RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
@LaurenGolden__ https://t.co/O5JPkp4XZC For all you a**holes claiming😷don’t work/1-way😷will suffice w/R15,as long as it’s not a jersey knitted neoprene😷or of the like,they f%*ing WORK to contain unmitigated spread INDOORS #wearadamnmask #maskup #maskmandat
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
One way masking is not sufficient
RT @lgoshen: @tagesschau 20% #SARSCoV2 Ansteckungsrisiko. Nein Danke. https://t.co/t6ILYwC6RH
RT @lgoshen: @tagesschau 20% #SARSCoV2 Ansteckungsrisiko. Nein Danke. https://t.co/t6ILYwC6RH
@tagesschau 20% #SARSCoV2 Ansteckungsrisiko. Nein Danke. https://t.co/t6ILYwC6RH
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
@Gab_H_R One-way masking is not enough, by the way. Up to 20% #SARSCoV2 infection risk to the FFP2-wearer when exposed to an unmasked infected person. https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
@Fiona_M_Russell Other research shows N95s that are merely conformed to the nose, and not fit tested, are much superior to surgical masks. No surprise there. Fit test, OK, but IMO more important to give the public a clear message that N95s are better.https
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
@TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20% infection risk with respirator when exposed to unmasked infected person: https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
@DanielS98005241 @1Mathelehrer @JSchmitzLeipzig @Tim_Roehn Ist halt entscheidend, das die Masken ordentlich getragen werden etc. https://t.co/NC4ahpk9bm
@WRealignment @RealSexyCyborg Masks are effective relative to the risk exposure when not wearing one, though there is less total effectiveness if only the uninfected wears them, though the odds change with length of exposure. See reference: https://t.co/Go
@JP__75 @DrEricDing @BigBadDenis @normanswan Reporter your tweet for misinformation 🙄 If masks didn’t work, we’d have piles and piles of dead HCW’s after working in Covid wards. Wtf is wrong with your brain? Maybe don’t read Facebook for a bit, yeah? Rea
RT @tmprowell: Risk differs when all mask vs only the most vulnerable mask. If 2 ppl speaking a few ft apart & 1 has #COVID19: 👉1 in surg😷=…
RT @tmprowell: Risk differs when all mask vs only the most vulnerable mask. If 2 ppl speaking a few ft apart & 1 has #COVID19: 👉1 in surg😷=…
@canadianpork22 @suzi_k123 @AberleJudith Yup not used correctly. Like all tools. For higher grade masks line n95 or ffp2 there are studies showing very high Levels of protection if both parties wearing it. https://t.co/LvECSjn5kS
RT @StefanoBerto83: L'efficacia one-to-one è estremamente alta per FFP2 e confermata pure in questo articolo 3/ https://t.co/Tfuu1PhGm1 ht…
L'efficacia one-to-one è estremamente alta per FFP2 e confermata pure in questo articolo 3/ https://t.co/Tfuu1PhGm1 https://t.co/oB7IKwteVU
Lo studio del Max Planck Institute lo conosco bene. Molto bene. Non capisco perchè nell'articolo scriviate il contrario di quanto affermano. https://t.co/W9DzPpN1YW Non capisco poi perchè non citiate studi(la stragrande maggioranza) che affermano l'efficac
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
@dianacalibana @alexfuse Ma l’idea sembra pure confermata da modelli e dati empirici. Lascio qua altri dati. Ripeto, io parlavo se sono l’unico ad usarla come è capitato qua mooooolto spesso negli ultimi 6 mesi https://t.co/Tfuu1P04Xr
@AILazzarino @giovannilandoni @ricpuglisi Scriva al Max Planck Institute. "Sono il Dr. Lazzarino e voi avete sbagliato tutto, incompetenti". Mi faccia sapere cosa le rispondono. Saluti, https://t.co/W9DzPpN1YW
@KWT62 Let’s listen to this trump-voting moron from the New Jersey backwoods and ignore the science 🙄 https://t.co/fb5uCS7t4L
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
Hier der wiss. Artikel dazu: https://t.co/raW2mUsM9w
@Mullich322 @bardiaborumeni @EvilTommes @yogibaer02 Was genau ist damit? Ich habe schon viele dazu gelesen - was genau möchten Sie mir dazu sagen? Meinen Sie z.B. diese? https://t.co/oFUxGzQbVH
RT @JeanMichelFleur: Evidencia científica que demuestra que los cubrebocas quirúrgicos no filtran el aire, que los filtradores o respirador…
@ernestopriego @snsf_ch Sars-CoV-2 is airborne! Aerosols play a central role in the transmission: https://t.co/RdNdP4uPE8 Clean air in indoor spaces reduces risk of infections. Wearing masks reduces the risk even further. FFP2 better than surgical masks: h
@Federico_Tonin @Paolo_Vig @RobertoBurioni @ricpuglisi Se indossate bene, Il Covid non passa, o la quantita' che passa e' assolutamente ridicola. Punto. Ti rimando inoltre a questo articolo serio, con fonti, che mostra chiaramente l'efficacia schiacciante
@BernhardZimniok Typisches AfD Desinformations Getrolle. https://t.co/ooo30mLgeU
@MrGlass61145253 @captainwonkish @ballyhoo2273 @akheriaty Those are not comparable to how we are using masks for covid. We have vastly more up to date research which all shows masks help https://t.co/qHbxZCs7Gx
@PaladinWaladin Ist halt nur übel wenn man an die falschen Dinge glaubt. https://t.co/JfXFIoWqtk
@JanGermanikus @st_hennermann Ich bin gerne mal behilflich, Ihrem Unwissen Abhilfe zu leisten. Studie der Uni Göttingen & des Max-Plack-Instituts. Übrigens bin ich mir sicher, dass der Mathematiker, die physikalischen Berechnungen nachvollziehen kann -
RT @JeanMichelFleur: @doctormacias Could .@doctormacias PLEASE ENCOURAGE HCWs to wear #N95 #P100 elastomeric #RESPIRATORS certified by .@NI…
RT @JeanMichelFleur: Miente .@doctormacias MÉDICOS Y ENFERMERAS DEBEN USAR FILTRADORES N95 CERTIFICADOS por @NIOSH_NPPTL ¡Para salvar otra…
@smiffysworld2 @EckerleIsabella @nrp78_covid19 @fns_ch Wrong. An FFP2 mask can reduce a person's infection risk by 80%. Infection risk is reduced to a fraction of a % when everyone in a room wears well-fitted FFP2 masks. This is why a universal FFP2 requir
@mitdiskutieren6 @SammyBytes @AskASwiss @EckerleIsabella @ccleighton Unadjusted FFP2s are still *much* better than well-adjusted surgical masks. (https://t.co/OpW3bs2hFk) https://t.co/yhyf5bTdUu
RT @tmprowell: P.S. Predictably some have arrived to say “& your story is why I don’t bother to #MaskUp.” I assume you’ve come in good fait…
RT @lgoshen: @kprather88 @dh112358 Prof. Prather, look at this paper from MPI Göttingen re: relative efficacy of masks, one-way masking, et…
RT @lgoshen: @kprather88 @dh112358 Prof. Prather, look at this paper from MPI Göttingen re: relative efficacy of masks, one-way masking, et…
RT @BagheriMos: @Roxane_ Thanks for sharing our work. FYI, I have updated the mask risk graph for Omicron, and the results are surprising i…
@wolvverinepld @AndreasPittoors @FFeys @EricTopol @bmj_latest So decide, can the elderly use them to decrease their risk or do they not work? Which one is it? 🤔 https://t.co/tEhydXqQGb https://t.co/bhI98Zy2oj https://t.co/ivpDg5h0EP
RT @tmprowell: P.S. Predictably some have arrived to say “& your story is why I don’t bother to #MaskUp.” I assume you’ve come in good fait…
RT @lgoshen: @kprather88 @dh112358 Prof. Prather, look at this paper from MPI Göttingen re: relative efficacy of masks, one-way masking, et…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
@Rossonerosemper @graz848 @ricpuglisi Mi permetto di suggerire un motivo ancora più importante e probabile. Questo è un link a uno studio che mi hanno postato come a sostegno delle mascherine. Ovviamente è una simulazione e... usa una carica virale MEDIA.
RT @tmprowell: Risk differs when all mask vs only the most vulnerable mask. If 2 ppl speaking a few ft apart & 1 has #COVID19: 👉1 in surg😷=…
@kprather88 Exactly THIS ⬇️⬇️ Big difference in risk if 1 person vs both people are wearing masks and if mask is N95 vs surgical @PNASNews @tmprowell #CovidIsNotOver #maskmandate #masks #Omicron #MedTwitter #MedEd https://t.co/WfDIZf3BBw @trishgreenhal
RT @tmprowell: Risk differs when all mask vs only the most vulnerable mask. If 2 ppl speaking a few ft apart & 1 has #COVID19: 👉1 in surg😷=…
RT @tmprowell: Risk differs when all mask vs only the most vulnerable mask. If 2 ppl speaking a few ft apart & 1 has #COVID19: 👉1 in surg😷=…
RT @tmprowell: Risk differs when all mask vs only the most vulnerable mask. If 2 ppl speaking a few ft apart & 1 has #COVID19: 👉1 in surg😷=…
@kprather88 @dh112358 Prof. Prather, look at this paper from MPI Göttingen re: relative efficacy of masks, one-way masking, etc. One-way masking is not enough. After 1 hour, infection risk for an FFP2 (~N95) wearer exposed to an unmasked infected person c
@fitterhappierAJ @kprather88 There are other studies showing the importance of minimizing gaps, particularly for source control but for filtration in general as well: https://t.co/XbmQ0iCESu, and https://t.co/GTrn1Bnj8j
@Devid__86 FFP2 uiteraard beter, maar dat chirurgisch niets helpt is ook niet juist. https://t.co/ScBUbaMbP6 https://t.co/6aA0WFeWPJ
RT @C_A_Gustave: 2/22 Il manque donc un éclaircissement sur mon insistance à recommander les FFP2/FFP3. Pour cela, je vais m'appuyer sur ce…
RT @tmprowell: Risk differs when all mask vs only the most vulnerable mask. If 2 ppl speaking a few ft apart & 1 has #COVID19: 👉1 in surg😷=…
RT @tmprowell: P.S. Predictably some have arrived to say “& your story is why I don’t bother to #MaskUp.” I assume you’ve come in good fait…
RT @tmprowell: P.S. Predictably some have arrived to say “& your story is why I don’t bother to #MaskUp.” I assume you’ve come in good fait…
RT @tmprowell: P.S. Predictably some have arrived to say “& your story is why I don’t bother to #MaskUp.” I assume you’ve come in good fait…
P.S. Predictably some have arrived to say “& your story is why I don’t bother to #MaskUp.” I assume you’ve come in good faith (because that’s the kind of tweeter I am 😇). So here you go: 😷 work great when we all wear them, & that, friends, is the p
論文っていうのはこれ。 https://t.co/2aBvuoR3o0
@UnrealJoker42 @justthore @nenacasc @Karl_Lauterbach Zur Effektivität von Masken gibt es jede Menge seriöse Studien. Worauf stützen Sie Ihre Aussage, die Maskenpflicht hätte keinen wesentlichen Einfluss auf das Infektionsgeschehen gehabt? Auf Studien? Oder
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
😷 Wearing a mask these days may add to stress as others choose to unmask. 🔗 A recent study shows the benefits of proper mask-wearing: https://t.co/DOf87m74LF 👩🏾⚕️ A N95 or KN95 may give you added confidence while out. #ConnectServeSupport #StopTheSprea
RT @JeanMichelFleur: @mdc_martinus @JennaLuche @Iamgoingtosleep @DrTedros @DrMikeRyan @WHO Could .@DrTedros please ENCOURAGE HCWs to wear N…
RT @TactNowInfo: One person with a surgical mask had a 90% chance of getting infected after 1/2 hour. A respirator had a 20% chance after a…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
@CDCgov Need other NPIs in addition to the 1st generation vaccines! Universal masking very effective when high-efficiency masks (N95, KN95, FFP2) worn by EVERYONE. One-way masking & floppy blue masks less effective, according to study from the Max Plan
RT @EberhardBodens1: On request we did same analysis as in https://t.co/Fkx49ggUnh when both infectious and susceptible are singing. This i…
@esunachimba @Amine19O @VickiMahony @GidMK Thanks for your concerns😉 Masks work. As does filtering air. They work well even w/ #omicron & when singing ! So yes Australia may be successful, that doesn't give you license to assume you are mr know every