@anjali_lobo @aishamae Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection after a f
@ZRistevski @aishamae Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection after a fe
@james_mc_carthy @aishamae Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection after
@mabeljessie @aishamae Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection after a f
@G7WTsteve @aishamae @altimetr Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection a
@fantoman79 @aishamae Wrong. Regional areas can have high prevalency, mine does. Here's why to mask "social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection after a few minutes" https://
@discoball2000 @aishamae Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection after a
@Reasonableques3 @aabalmain @aishamae Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infe
@HelenFa92229708 @ranjitrao1 @aishamae Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of inf
@dianacalibana @aleph_sars Questo é "lo studio". Quando verrà sconfessato se ne prenderà atto. In attesa, esercizi su distribuzioni a varianza infinita non hanno conclusioni finite. Se non per farsi(appunto) ridere in faccia. La fisica é poco elastica..
@elizavetaka This one even compares the effectiveness of different mask types: https://t.co/X3k3729gg8
RT @lonnibesancon: Pour le masque c'est ici: https://t.co/krweqXkxGo https://t.co/XdT7ruBy3V https://t.co/ckMqdGeLar
RT @lonnibesancon: Pour le masque c'est ici: https://t.co/krweqXkxGo https://t.co/XdT7ruBy3V https://t.co/ckMqdGeLar
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @jewstein3000: I'm sure you know the science by now, but maybe you forgot. My mask alone doesn't protect me. I need all of you masked up…
@Skanarchist8 @fitterhappierAJ @kprather88 Whoops! I realized I didn't recommend the GVS 644 source control P100 in this thread. https://t.co/U9V7MACPjH Source control (no exhale valve) is important for pathogens: exhalation valves aren't needed and do not
I'm sure you know the science by now, but maybe you forgot. My mask alone doesn't protect me. I need all of you masked up too
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @EllrodtAxel: @HemaQuebec @Jul101Vie Le masque "médical" est une usine à fuites. Même bien mis (rare). Demandez aux physiciens. 1% de f…
RT @EllrodtAxel: @HemaQuebec @Jul101Vie Le masque "médical" est une usine à fuites. Même bien mis (rare). Demandez aux physiciens. 1% de f…
@HemaQuebec @Jul101Vie Le masque "médical" est une usine à fuites. Même bien mis (rare). Demandez aux physiciens. 1% de fuite et 50% de l'air n'est pas filtré. C'est l'air qui porte le virus. Imposer vos N95 serait plus conforme. https://t.co/cHAisXVuNV
RT @lonnibesancon: Pour le masque c'est ici: https://t.co/krweqXkxGo https://t.co/XdT7ruBy3V https://t.co/ckMqdGeLar
RT @JeanMichelFleur: @tesla_george @HuLeeYo @rafoji Could .@tesla_george please ENCOURAGE HCWs to wear N95 and P100 elastomeric RESPIRATORS…
@Lostpolitik94 @CJ_Dewing @ChuckWurster One last time, in case you are a real person and not just an Internet Research Agency troll... "...after becoming mandatory face masks have reduced the number of new infections by around 45%..." https://t.co/bQyUNN
RT @crimsonartist: @LilliaMarcos @SofiaAnnieW @DrShaneRRR Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infec…
RT @crimsonartist: @ottavl @lisa_iannattone Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, th…
RT @lonnibesancon: Pour le masque c'est ici: https://t.co/krweqXkxGo https://t.co/XdT7ruBy3V https://t.co/ckMqdGeLar
RT @crimsonartist: @ottavl @lisa_iannattone Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, th…
RT @crimsonartist: @ottavl @lisa_iannattone Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, th…
@SahabiaAli @lonnibesancon Quand on voit les modalités de l’étude sur les masques .. soit il ne l’a pas lue . soit il ment sciemment et espere que les gens ne le fassent pas https://t.co/B9Vrr8NMIp
RT @crimsonartist: @ottavl @lisa_iannattone Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, th…
RT @crimsonartist: @LilliaMarcos @SofiaAnnieW @DrShaneRRR Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infec…
RT @lonnibesancon: Pour le masque c'est ici: https://t.co/krweqXkxGo https://t.co/XdT7ruBy3V https://t.co/ckMqdGeLar
RT @lonnibesancon: Pour le masque c'est ici: https://t.co/krweqXkxGo https://t.co/XdT7ruBy3V https://t.co/ckMqdGeLar
Pour le masque c'est ici: https://t.co/krweqXkxGo https://t.co/XdT7ruBy3V https://t.co/ckMqdGeLar
RT @crimsonartist: @LilliaMarcos @SofiaAnnieW @DrShaneRRR Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infec…
RT @crimsonartist: @LilliaMarcos @SofiaAnnieW @DrShaneRRR Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infec…
@ottavl @lisa_iannattone Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection after a
@LilliaMarcos @SofiaAnnieW @DrShaneRRR Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of inf
Why ALL should wear masks "We found for a typical SARS-CoV-2 viral load and infectious dose, that social distancing alone, even at 3.0 m between two speaking individuals, leads to an upper bound of 90% for risk of infection after a few minutes" https://t.c
@taipan168 @MichaelSFuhrer @CrabbBrendan @profmiketoole 3/3 See study below- 75x (30/.4) reduction in transmission predicted when both parties wear N95 type masks cf surgical. IMO universal N95 type masks in public indoor spaces, and HEPA, are worth tryin
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @jewstein3000: No I can't just protect myself. https://t.co/CmVMd9dLvT
@sweatnap @emily_f_miller @GreedyReads @baynardwoods @notrivia @LisaMcCray Would be cool if you guys could require masks at events so immunocompromised people can safely attend, esp as the case rate is over the alarm level. Data: https://t.co/ClIGsxn9PS
@rickwhufc @CasinoAndywhufc @WestHamMatters I’ll point you here again because you’re confusing reducing risk with magically erasing it again. Risk reductions stack. Filtering the source and the sink is more effective than just the source. Read this and yo
RT @trishgreenhalgh: I don't often use this term, but the Bagheri et al paper on mask efficacy is a game changer. Brilliantly summarised by…
@pommes250 @MySFKitchen @flo_mask 2/2 See here: https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
RT @dadshonan: @osamu_iga @influenzer3 @shuichiotsu 論文1
RT @jewstein3000: No I can't just protect myself. https://t.co/CmVMd9dLvT
An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles | PNAS https://t.co/aERQZbnVRM
RT @jewstein3000: No I can't just protect myself. https://t.co/CmVMd9dLvT
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @deprecatedCode: @Ostprog @JSchmitzLeipzig Ja, aber
RT @f2135: @DrScheuch Wie ist hier „Schützen“ definiert? Ist das eine Binäre-Kategorie? Wie würden sie diese Untersuchung mit den Abstufun…
RT @f2135: @DrScheuch Wie ist hier „Schützen“ definiert? Ist das eine Binäre-Kategorie? Wie würden sie diese Untersuchung mit den Abstufun…
RT @f2135: @DrScheuch Wie ist hier „Schützen“ definiert? Ist das eine Binäre-Kategorie? Wie würden sie diese Untersuchung mit den Abstufun…
cc @LuMo71 @EttoreEniLupo @Ciribini @RobiVil
RT @deprecatedCode: @Ostprog @JSchmitzLeipzig Ja, aber
@SapiensWell @markensysteme @quarkswdr @christoph_rothe OK, dank @morr_is habe ich es jetzt wohl verstanden. https://t.co/aM8NpPm5vm
@morr_is @markensysteme @quarkswdr @christoph_rothe Ah, perfekt, herzlichen Dank! Mit dieser Quelle kann man arbeiten :-) Mein 1. Eindruck: Der Text, den Sie verlinkt haben, gibt die eigentliche Studie nicht gut wieder, obwohl er von der MPG selbst ist.
No I can't just protect myself. https://t.co/CmVMd9dLvT
RT @f2135: @DrScheuch Wie ist hier „Schützen“ definiert? Ist das eine Binäre-Kategorie? Wie würden sie diese Untersuchung mit den Abstufun…
@Ostprog @JSchmitzLeipzig Ja, aber
RT @f2135: @DrScheuch Wie ist hier „Schützen“ definiert? Ist das eine Binäre-Kategorie? Wie würden sie diese Untersuchung mit den Abstufun…
@DrScheuch Wie ist hier „Schützen“ definiert? Ist das eine Binäre-Kategorie? Wie würden sie diese Untersuchung mit den Abstufungen einordnen?
@SargonAlmighty @Elise_ekd If only the susceptible wears a face mask..90%-20% (depending on type of mask) after 30 min... When both wear a surgical mask..below 30% after 1 h. When both wear a well-fitting FFP2 mask, it is 0.4%. https://t.co/Uuix3lefxO
@olfriedus Die Studie, auf die sich der Artikel bezieht findest du hier: Bagheri et al.: An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles (PNAS, 2021): https://t.co/BI6tp2Vqyu
@Micha_1893_ @quarkswdr https://t.co/L5pb6cAoX3 Ich finde schon, dass das offene Beschäftigung mit Wissenschaft ist, da dieses Paper sonst vermutlich viele nicht verstanden hätten.
@chipotlechipot3 Wir beziehen uns auf Studien, in dem Fall auf die Studie von Forschenden des Max-Planck-Institut für Dynamik und Selbstorganisation (https://t.co/H2mkzy323q) und Yafang Cheng et al. (https://t.co/7E6audUTZ7) - auf die kannst du ja dann auc
@langlais_e Ne, der hat mit den Studien nichts zu tun ;) siehe z.B.: https://t.co/BI6tp2Vqyu
@zeevilkohl es gibt zahlreiche Studien dazu, hier beziehen wir uns hauptsächlich auf folgende: https://t.co/BI6tp2Vqyu
@felixgirke siehe dazu u.a. : Bagheri et al.: An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles (PNAS, 2021): https://t.co/BI6tp2Vqyu
@MIGO_Offiziell made in Germany. https://t.co/ucQdK3pnwP
@geber_martin @VQuaschning @fdp @Wissing Nochmal die Studie im Detail https://t.co/r8W5VGFxTR Ihre Aussage ist schlichtweg nicht korrekt
@abumtadir @xxloulou00 @hi_tanja @Karl_Lauterbach Ah, so funktioniert Wissenschaft. Hier ein bisschen fundierter: https://t.co/r8W5VGFxTR
@paddleplr @DocJeffD @paddleplr that study assume an infected person is breathing in the health care worker's face for 40 minutes straight from 1 foot away... two people wearing non-fit tested KN-95s reduce infection risk by 99.5% https://t.co/PZKcbjxUWX
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @MyleneDiPenta: @Trev_Marsh @oaedoel @JolyonRubs Yes, surgical masks help a little. Masks that *fit to your face* (i.e. N95/KF94/KN95) h…
RT @lgoshen: @TheVelvetDays 2/2 One-way masking is not as effective as the pundits and airlines would have you believe! Source for up to 20…