@PFriedling @GlobalEcoGuy Yes it was, I just thought it funny the same authors published a similar article in 2009... https://t.co/SCdtyTmJSX
@JesseLReynolds @EricHolthaus > “one should communicate in a way that helps build a winning coalition” Do you propose we sugarcoat near-term risk of billions dying from abrupt feedback-driven global warming? https://t.co/wvGB9I0dJw https://t.co/KQ6Bi
@Urrff @Reuters I don’t know about existence of disingenuous agitators, but I do know that if fossil fuels aren’t phased out by at least 50% in the next 10 years billions will die. https://t.co/wvGB9I0dJw https://t.co/KQ6BiFHMVj https://t.co/tRsvoDSpNy
@_waleedshahid No #GreenNewDeal, no support. If we fail to phase out then ban fossil fuels over the next 10 years, billions of currently living humans will be killed by feedback-driven #ClimateBreakdown. https://t.co/wvGB9I0dJw https://t.co/KQ6BiFHMVj
@einandererblog @6esm a) doomsday—or not—is up to us https://t.co/tRsvoDSpNy https://t.co/wvGB9I0dJw https://t.co/uHep8gPG6P https://t.co/KQ6BiFHMVj b) fossil carbon—certainly human-caused—is definitely driving current warming https://t.co/jRKtO71igW
Ergänzend @StSchulmeister & @norbertghofer : Molina, Mario; et al (2009): Reducing abrupt climate change risk using the Montreal Protocol and other regulatory actions to complement cuts in CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
.@BBCRBlack you mention HFCs only in intro of http://t.co/ntL6HKTU . What's the story? Action might be meaningful (http://t.co/ZLXbK6WC)
@cr0atz Don't get your knickers in a knot! Calm down, lol http://t.co/18CXdgT8