| Title |
Reducing abrupt climate change risk using the Montreal Protocol and other regulatory actions to complement cuts in CO2 emissions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0902568106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mario Molina, Durwood Zaelke, K. Madhava Sarma, Stephen O. Andersen, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Donald Kaniaru |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 3% |
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Réunion | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 306 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 88 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 75 | 22% |
| Unknown | 37 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 91 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 49 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 12% |
| Engineering | 21 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 20% |
| Unknown | 51 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#394,171
of 26,047,917 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,993
of 104,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,224
of 180,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22
of 867 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,047,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 867 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.