RT @vlanx0: OK, ça semble se confirmer : si vous voyez de plus en plus de trucs de droite dans votre TL, c'est "by design" Supposons un in…
Update en faveur de la première hypothèse : https://t.co/5HmtNWzz3D
RT @vlanx0: OK, ça semble se confirmer : si vous voyez de plus en plus de trucs de droite dans votre TL, c'est "by design" Supposons un in…
OK, ça semble se confirmer : si vous voyez de plus en plus de trucs de droite dans votre TL, c'est "by design" Supposons un instant que Musk essaye sincèrement de "réduire la polarisation" par cela Ben, manque de bol, ça a l'effet inverse, SOURCE : https
@alialsalim Probably wouldn’t matter. As this study points out, being exposed to differing viewpoints can have a similar effect on polarization as being in an algo-echo chamber: https://t.co/bLPJtINVYK
@TedRall There's lots of research that explores those questions. Some examples below. I am not sure I've seen any that defines "essential" or shows that social media enhances democracy. https://t.co/OiM6ztO7t5 https://t.co/hLCWhLpivO https://t.co/DVX6ZPe0
In this highly cited @PNASNews paper, @fmerhout (with colleagues) studies how exposure to opposing views on social media may increase political participation https://t.co/UfEjMKJEWw 7/20
RT @TriTexan: I'm providing the link here so you can read it in depth if desired. The TL;DR follows in the next tweet or two. https://t.co/…
I'm providing the link here so you can read it in depth if desired. The TL;DR follows in the next tweet or two. https://t.co/5Z81OMlRo0
Social media sites are often blamed for exacerbating political polarization by creating “echo chambers” that prevent people from being exposed to information that contradicts their preexisting beliefs. https://t.co/M6BC9HOg2R
@Noahpinion You could be accidentally right.. https://t.co/myaMVVRvFS
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization | PNAS https://t.co/173yPUnnTp
I'd like to hear different opinions IF the facts presented are true, which is a big IF, because of the freedom of the press to spin or down right lie.. Sucks having to fact check everything you read! https://t.co/aOPvHaQHoN
Read more here: https://t.co/Skoz03SqEV
@Bojerlanski Hier wäre ein Paper von 2018 das sich mit Twitter beschäftigt, und es sollte auch was ähnliches für Facebook existieren, aber da finde ich den thread nicht mehr wo ein Link gepostet wurde. https://t.co/Y31HWicLkg
@f_hieronymus @Nonemo @Ivarpi @somaralnaher @hanifbali Jag trodde som du för några veckor sedan, men jag tror inte det förhåller sig så längre efter att ha läst några artiklar. Det kan förhålla sig så, att mötas av motsatta sidan på sociala medier kan öka
This article exposes how social media can hide certain posts that exhibit political information that contradicts a user’s current beliefs #eme4390S22 https://t.co/MyE25T5mzC
@MattF4Ukraine Yes! That reminds me. A lot of it is specifically about Twitter. Bail et al. 2018 exposed Republicans & Democrats to opposing views; Republicans got a lot more Republican, Democrats got slightly more Democrat https://t.co/64WWSKHe8v
@joshgnosis yeah, there is research that backs this up (as opposed to “echo chamber” etc) https://t.co/O4MybzKV2R
@EdithSamson @MecAutoDr @anar_coco Vous parlez de ça? On est très loin d'une preuve. Et même si cette piste de recherche était généralisable à tous les contextes, ce qu'il semble en ressortir c'est que l'exposition se fait aux idées à l'extrême du spectre
@MiguelCze @TGuthJarkovsky @ooclevice Není problém v těch Tweetech, ale vtom resharování. Nemůžeš random dát nejvíc levicový Tweet levičáka a ukazovat to pravičákům. To je geniální recept na polarizaci. Můžeš to dělat ofc, ale jseš imho parazit na lidské
RT @cfr0g: "SNS에서 반대 견해에 노출되면 정치적 양극화가 심화될 수 있다"는 논문. 그동안 SNS의 반향실(echo chamber) 효과 때문에 그런게 아니냐는 의심이 많았는데, 이 실험은 결과가 예상과 조금 다른듯. 반대 의견 트위…
RT @cfr0g: "SNS에서 반대 견해에 노출되면 정치적 양극화가 심화될 수 있다"는 논문. 그동안 SNS의 반향실(echo chamber) 효과 때문에 그런게 아니냐는 의심이 많았는데, 이 실험은 결과가 예상과 조금 다른듯. 반대 의견 트위…
RT @cfr0g: "SNS에서 반대 견해에 노출되면 정치적 양극화가 심화될 수 있다"는 논문. 그동안 SNS의 반향실(echo chamber) 효과 때문에 그런게 아니냐는 의심이 많았는데, 이 실험은 결과가 예상과 조금 다른듯. 반대 의견 트위…
RT @cfr0g: "SNS에서 반대 견해에 노출되면 정치적 양극화가 심화될 수 있다"는 논문. 그동안 SNS의 반향실(echo chamber) 효과 때문에 그런게 아니냐는 의심이 많았는데, 이 실험은 결과가 예상과 조금 다른듯. 반대 의견 트위…
RT @cfr0g: "SNS에서 반대 견해에 노출되면 정치적 양극화가 심화될 수 있다"는 논문. 그동안 SNS의 반향실(echo chamber) 효과 때문에 그런게 아니냐는 의심이 많았는데, 이 실험은 결과가 예상과 조금 다른듯. 반대 의견 트위…
RT @cfr0g: "SNS에서 반대 견해에 노출되면 정치적 양극화가 심화될 수 있다"는 논문. 그동안 SNS의 반향실(echo chamber) 효과 때문에 그런게 아니냐는 의심이 많았는데, 이 실험은 결과가 예상과 조금 다른듯. 반대 의견 트위…
RT @cfr0g: "SNS에서 반대 견해에 노출되면 정치적 양극화가 심화될 수 있다"는 논문. 그동안 SNS의 반향실(echo chamber) 효과 때문에 그런게 아니냐는 의심이 많았는데, 이 실험은 결과가 예상과 조금 다른듯. 반대 의견 트위…
"SNS에서 반대 견해에 노출되면 정치적 양극화가 심화될 수 있다"는 논문. 그동안 SNS의 반향실(echo chamber) 효과 때문에 그런게 아니냐는 의심이 많았는데, 이 실험은 결과가 예상과 조금 다른듯. 반대 의견 트위터봇을 팔로우하고 더 보수적인 의견으로 바뀌었다고. https://t.co/Dl8VdmRjdw
Este paper del 2018 tiene como resultado que ser expuesto a opiniones políticas opuestas en redes sociales hace que el nivel de polarización aumenta, mucho más para Republicanos que para Demócratas. https://t.co/Nbo43EYAib
@elonmusk You might have those poles inversed... "[S]tudies … observe asymmetric polarization in roll call voting wherein Republicans have become substantially more conservative whereas Democrats exhibit little or no increase in liberal voting positions."
RT @mtknnktm: 反対意見に接触すると態度がより強固になる。特に保守の人。Twitter@USでの実験で、共和党員(保守)にリベラルなボット、民主党員(リベラル)に保守的なボットをフォローしてもらって影響を分析。共和党員は態度を保守的にした一方で民主党員はそこまででも…
@ravibapna @VasantDhar Cool! I was looking for a new podcast, so I will definitely listen to it. Thanks for sharing. And yes, @chris_bail’s work is awesome! I really enjoyed his bot and polarization paper: https://t.co/epSJAuUgXs
@DaniNovarama Es loable escuchar al otro. Sin embargo, hacerlo con la intención previa de rebatir es un ejercicio de confirmación. También empaquetar tus opiniones sobre el vídeo dificulta a los que te leemos formarnos opinión propia. https://t.co/LBfgfwO
@sanguit This is super insightful. It offers a likely answer for a question I had after reading about this study https://t.co/AC9rd8ZskO
@d_f_stone @ezraklein And here’s the result I mentioned (I though it was what your op was reacting to — I now see that you’ve been talking about the epistemic backfire results, which are different) https://t.co/jDTTAj5NBV
The literature on the boomerang/backfire effects of exposure to counter-attitudinal information is inconclusive, with some finding radicalizing effects (https://t.co/dU48afoHYZ) and others finding mostly null effects (https://t.co/VysvqqZNXd)
@savkooneal Here is a tweet with relevant references: https://t.co/QZ59yN51kO
@HumanomicsMap Her er en række referencer: https://t.co/HryUXDp6Fu https://t.co/kmDQwiRC75 https://t.co/CtQjLfmnvj https://t.co/6j7WRBDGf0 https://t.co/emDIHYPwbq https://t.co/xE16JLfii3 (1/2)
Complement this with this paper by @chris_bail on how social media simply polarizes us even more https://t.co/G6gs2lLErH
Hybrid Approach 2: * Survey respondents induced to follow certain accounts on social media (randomized across follow treatments) * Complete later follow-up survey * Test effect of following on survey responses Cool example: @Chris_bail https://t.co/YSP33gv
RT @DirkBrockmann: Die Publikation, die ich da diskutiere ist in der Tat sehr interessant und hat mich selbst in ihren Ergebnissen überrasc…
RT @DirkBrockmann: Die Publikation, die ich da diskutiere ist in der Tat sehr interessant und hat mich selbst in ihren Ergebnissen überrasc…
RT @DirkBrockmann: Die Publikation, die ich da diskutiere ist in der Tat sehr interessant und hat mich selbst in ihren Ergebnissen überrasc…
RT @DirkBrockmann: Die Publikation, die ich da diskutiere ist in der Tat sehr interessant und hat mich selbst in ihren Ergebnissen überrasc…
RT @DirkBrockmann: Die Publikation, die ich da diskutiere ist in der Tat sehr interessant und hat mich selbst in ihren Ergebnissen überrasc…
RT @DirkBrockmann: Die Publikation, die ich da diskutiere ist in der Tat sehr interessant und hat mich selbst in ihren Ergebnissen überrasc…
RT @DirkBrockmann: Die Publikation, die ich da diskutiere ist in der Tat sehr interessant und hat mich selbst in ihren Ergebnissen überrasc…
RT @medienpirat: „Offenbar können Menschen ihre Meinung nur ändern oder hinterfragen, wenn die Exposition durch andere Meinungen in sehr, s…
Spannende Studie, Lese-Empfehlung
Die Publikation, die ich da diskutiere ist in der Tat sehr interessant und hat mich selbst in ihren Ergebnissen überrascht.
„Offenbar können Menschen ihre Meinung nur ändern oder hinterfragen, wenn die Exposition durch andere Meinungen in sehr, sehr milden Dosen stattfindet.“ @DirkBrockmann S.181 (Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization -
RT @AvrumGillespie: @nephondemand Paradoxically following a bot of the opposing view point actually worsened polarization. Reducing polariz…
@nephondemand Paradoxically following a bot of the opposing view point actually worsened polarization. Reducing polarization and changing attitudes is challenging. https://t.co/Y9f3U3w9Hi
Oui, c'est vrai.
@nicolasnova @MichelLussault @nofluxin Il reste que son papier est intéressant. https://t.co/MDP0zgxcFA
RT @ken_sugar: ▼「人はSNSで自分の政治的な立場に近い意見ばかりを読みがちで異なる立場の意見を継続的に目にすると、かえって自分の立場に凝り固まるという研究結果(※)がアメリカで発表されました。」 ※ソース論文(注:英文記事) https://t.co/xMBab…
@acerbialberto The work of @chris_bail seems relevant here, for example example: https://t.co/1uw5x7CBdA
ただ、「Twitterで反対意見に触れることで意見を変える、あるいは柔軟になる」というわけでもなさそうだという研究結果もあります。 このアメリカの研究では、反対意見に触れることでより政治信念が強固になった人もいるようです。 https://t.co/trzOZrGdQz
@SirDemiface What's really funny is that there's a kernel of truth to this (though I'm sure Bors didn't intend it). A limited study shows that exposure to opposing views can entrench and radicalize Republicans, though it's unclear which exact messaging doe
@TheRealJoeKewl @averykimball @Ahabs_Mind Supporting study: https://t.co/pgBo4B5D4y
@seriseins Checked, and it's even funnier. Exposure to opposing views on social media makes you *more* entrenched in your original views. But not in a statistically significant manner. https://t.co/pgBo4B5D4y
RT @ken_sugar: ▼「人はSNSで自分の政治的な立場に近い意見ばかりを読みがちで異なる立場の意見を継続的に目にすると、かえって自分の立場に凝り固まるという研究結果(※)がアメリカで発表されました。」 ※ソース論文(注:英文記事) https://t.co/xMBab…
you’ve likely heard that social networks drive “bubbles” & we need to talk to each other. except! research shows that the more exposure to the “other” side, the more extreme views become. maybe “don’t talk politics w/ dinner guests” was prescient advi
The book is a deep dive into Chris' et al. excellent PNAS paper, which exposed liberals and conservatives to content produced by the other side, leading to polarization. 2/8 https://t.co/OFRBcX2hi1
RT @M_B_Petersen: Og måske overraskende er det netop eksponeringen for "de andre" online, som kan være med til at drive online hadet. Det t…
RT @M_B_Petersen: Og måske overraskende er det netop eksponeringen for "de andre" online, som kan være med til at drive online hadet. Det t…
RT @M_B_Petersen: Og måske overraskende er det netop eksponeringen for "de andre" online, som kan være med til at drive online hadet. Det t…
Og måske overraskende er det netop eksponeringen for "de andre" online, som kan være med til at drive online hadet. Det tyder amerikanske forskning på: https://t.co/kmDQwiRC75. Og det tyder vores egen danske forskning på: https://t.co/6G0rlq4V6T. [3/4]
@NateSilver538 This is not actually a sign of intellectual openness. It’s a function of intellectual discomfort: being exposed to views you disagree with makes you move further away from the center https://t.co/cAKOCfRiwL
RT @crystaljjlee: 6/ additionally, sociologists like @chris_bail have shown how being exposed to *more* opposing views actually increases p…
But some studies suggest that conservatives are more likely to polarize than liberals (for instance Bail et al. 2018) https://t.co/XX5j1tYmi7
RT @s_wallaschek: #ValEUF "Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization" - important study @bail et al. f…
RT @s_wallaschek: #ValEUF "Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization" - important study @bail et al. f…
#ValEUF "Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization" - important study @bail et al. from 2018 @PNASNews https://t.co/SBvj2ZMiyk
One for our reading group @a_dinkelberg
Very impressive investigative methods.
RT @fcakenterprises: @niccolethurman @KT_Hamilton1969 @marcellacomedy This is absolutely correct, and there are now literal studies showing…
@niccolethurman @KT_Hamilton1969 @marcellacomedy This is absolutely correct, and there are now literal studies showing that publicly attempting to take people to task on social media is counterproductive. (https://t.co/lcTOqwbYeU)
https://t.co/jmPjoNTbG9 Something nice.
@Lizettle_ I just learnt that a person whose mind is already configured by religion or education is never going to shift. They’ll always think you’re wrong. So now on, it’s to call on the Holy Spirit ooo. My mouth don tear. https://t.co/jmPjoNTbG9 Read t
RT @chris_bail: You can also use our tools to identify whether you are in an echo chamber. But make sure to read our research that suggests…
RT @chris_bail: You can also use our tools to identify whether you are in an echo chamber. But make sure to read our research that suggests…
@Hopozitzia זה ברור. אבל החלק המבאס שהפתיע גם אותי זה חשיפה של אנשים לדעות מגוונות רק הגדילה את הניגודיות שלהם. זה לפי מחקרים של השנים האחרונות. https://t.co/l7PIoMepkh
There is mounting concern that social media sites contribute to political polarization by creating “echo chambers” that insulate people from opposing views about current events https://t.co/gUg905WvAG
@LHurttila @AtteHarjanne @Juha_the_Great Ajattelen tässä nimittäin sitä, että moitteet saattavat vain vahvistaa niitä näkemyksiä, joihin haluttaisiin muutosta. https://t.co/GxeunnDvuK
@JakeMGrumbach @thinkinthemorn_ @BradSpahn right, Q is what the effect of exposure to the other side does. and to your point, what’s going on offline as the counterfactual baseline is important. some other papers I’d add: https://t.co/qz2CfRNMdz https:/
RT @chris_bail: You can also use our tools to identify whether you are in an echo chamber. But make sure to read our research that suggests…
RT @chris_bail: You can also use our tools to identify whether you are in an echo chamber. But make sure to read our research that suggests…
RT @chris_bail: You can also use our tools to identify whether you are in an echo chamber. But make sure to read our research that suggests…
You can also use our tools to identify whether you are in an echo chamber. But make sure to read our research that suggests stepping outside your echo chamber can also be counter-productive if not done properly: https://t.co/rUUXwBw01R (ungated) https://t.
@HuhtasaariSaara Toisaalta altistuminen ns. vastapuolen informaatiolle sosiaalisessa mediassa voi lisätä poteroitumista omaan poliittiseen kuplaan: https://t.co/mpwuBznaqH
@henrimifa Silloin kannattaa ehdottomasti harkita sitä vaihtoehtoa, että keskustelua ei jatketa. Keskustelun jatkaminen ristiriitojen vallitessa saattaa vain syventää poteroita, ja sen takia toivottu lopputulos siirtyykin kauemmaksi. Yrittämällä lisää se
@stilgherrian @snurb_dot_info I kinda sorta remember what you are talking abt too ... but cannot locate anything using that info... BUT any one of the references in this article may cite or mention it. https://t.co/WBEe4LShVG
(Although of course not clear if it's actually beneficial to increase cross-party connection - @chris_bail et al suggest maybe not https://t.co/TSHPgnuIwL, @RoeeLevyZ suggests maybe yes https://t.co/YI9QJ9C1Ls )