RT @adamgdunn: Exposing Twitter users to bots expressing opposing political views did not reduce polarization and might have induced backfi…
RT @asarin: SNSで異なる立場の意見は逆効果 米研究G発表 | NHKニュース https://t.co/f1oeU7IYo5 原典PNAS https://t.co/cCIDhXd61f
Exposing Twitter users to bots expressing opposing political views did not reduce polarization and might have induced backfire among conservatives. https://t.co/asT5lw0AUy https://t.co/ID0pbyJQM4
RT @acerbialberto: So *both* exposure to opposing views *and* no exposure to opposing views (“echo-chambers”) lead to polarisation... https…
RT @JohnHolbein1: Paper here: https://t.co/Z1LuzfndY2
RT @h_okumura: Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization https://t.co/n8EJDH7720 https://t.co/PN8LIASP…
RT @jessecshore: Interesting new paper. The core-periphery structure of Twitter means that most people *are* exposed to opposing views. h…
これらしい Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization https://t.co/s0GuETuAKW
RT @asarin: SNSで異なる立場の意見は逆効果 米研究G発表 | NHKニュース https://t.co/f1oeU7IYo5 原典PNAS https://t.co/cCIDhXd61f
RT @h_okumura: Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization https://t.co/n8EJDH7720 https://t.co/PN8LIASP…
これは
RT @asarin: SNSで異なる立場の意見は逆効果 米研究G発表 | NHKニュース https://t.co/f1oeU7IYo5 原典PNAS https://t.co/cCIDhXd61f
RT @asarin: SNSで異なる立場の意見は逆効果 米研究G発表 | NHKニュース https://t.co/f1oeU7IYo5 原典PNAS https://t.co/cCIDhXd61f
RT @asarin: SNSで異なる立場の意見は逆効果 米研究G発表 | NHKニュース https://t.co/f1oeU7IYo5 原典PNAS https://t.co/cCIDhXd61f
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization https://t.co/n8EJDH7720 https://t.co/PN8LIASPKK
SNSで異なる立場の意見は逆効果 米研究G発表 | NHKニュース https://t.co/f1oeU7IYo5 原典PNAS https://t.co/cCIDhXd61f
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization | PNAS https://t.co/POEJ6u2vwp
RT @tngn55: 原著:https://t.co/N3k02Njws3
RT @tngn55: 原著:https://t.co/N3k02Njws3
Maybe social media isn't an echo chamber, but promotes polarization through the wrong kind of contact between opposing views? #Twitter https://t.co/2XhOD8ypkF
RT @informor: Turns out the bubble won't pop due to a single opposing view (operationalized as a Twitter account the subjects had to add th…
Interesting study on how ‘Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization’ https://t.co/VfKFgOVAvM
Turns out the bubble won't pop due to a single opposing view (operationalized as a Twitter account the subjects had to add the people they follow). Instead, a backfire effect occurred, esp. for conservatives subjects, whose views became more polarized. ht
RT @AndyLuttrell5: Interesting new PNAS paper manip'ed whether liberal/conservative Twitter users saw influx of opposite-party RTs for a mo…
RT @Chris_Said: 1/ Here's a nice paper from @chris_bail showing that exposure to opposing views increases online polarization. Some people…
Thread on groups and persuasion
8/ Anyway, although I'm afraid some people might misinterpret it, I think it's a nice paper with a very good discussion at the end. https://t.co/EWc9ZLxdXn
1/ Here's a nice paper from @chris_bail showing that exposure to opposing views increases online polarization. Some people are misinterpreting this to mean that filter bubbles aren't really a problem, but I think it's consistent with the exact opposite. ht
RT @acerbialberto: So *both* exposure to opposing views *and* no exposure to opposing views (“echo-chambers”) lead to polarisation... https…
“Republican participants expressed substantially more conservative views after following a liberal Twitter bot, whereas Democrats’ attitudes became slightly more liberal [though not statistically significant] after following a conservative Twitter bot” htt
@chris_bail @PNASNews Looks interesting! To save a search: https://t.co/gz05MVUyvQ
Attending #APSA2018? Don't miss @lpargyle present the results from our field experiment on Twitter which investigated the effects of opening up partisan echo chambers.
RT @PierLuigiSacco: Is political polarization the product of digital echo chambers? Not necessarily: exposure to opposing views can do as w…
Interesting new PNAS paper manip'ed whether liberal/conservative Twitter users saw influx of opposite-party RTs for a month. Exposure to counter-partisan tweets POLARIZED initial ideology (among conservatives) vs. breaking people out of their bubbles https
"a field experiment that offered a large group of Democrats and Republicans financial compensation to follow bots" https://t.co/7vmSy0Tj8J https://t.co/GGbWRnyqyM
Is political polarization the product of digital echo chambers? Not necessarily: exposure to opposing views can do as well. Therefore?... https://t.co/mjDl7vAyV7
RT @jessecshore: Interesting new paper. The core-periphery structure of Twitter means that most people *are* exposed to opposing views. h…
RT @jessecshore: Interesting new paper. The core-periphery structure of Twitter means that most people *are* exposed to opposing views. h…
New @PNASNews today: Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase polarization. https://t.co/9PPluUSeRk Come hear me talk about it at #APSA2018 - Saturday 4 pm.
RT @acerbialberto: So *both* exposure to opposing views *and* no exposure to opposing views (“echo-chambers”) lead to polarisation... https…
RT @JohnHolbein1: Paper here: https://t.co/Z1LuzfndY2
Interesting new paper. The core-periphery structure of Twitter means that most people *are* exposed to opposing views. https://t.co/ysX61V7RCt
RT @ndiakopoulos: Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization: https://t.co/ocAjfXT7ls
Is self-advertisement as ethically dubious as self-citation or self-plagiarism? This paper will definitely not answer this, but go read it anyway.
Not a sociologist, but this study design doesn't seem right to me. People being paid to do a thing they don't like are probably not going to decide to like it afterward? Any sociologists/political scientists want to weigh in? https://t.co/GjV6UaB6uB
*walks into the sea* Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization https://t.co/4B5Yzki8ZZ
Feeling like a true scientist today, publishing a paper with NINE co-authors in no lesser journal than PNAS. Also, if you are reading this you probably live in a liberal echo chamber and I highly recommend you read this: https://t.co/1rASJvJBzm
Ποιοί ευθύνονται τελικά για την πολιτική πόλωση; https://t.co/2TRrZEhu9S
So *both* exposure to opposing views *and* no exposure to opposing views (“echo-chambers”) lead to polarisation... https://t.co/e3u2tarOrV
No hope at all? https://t.co/bWDjnXaYvS
RT @ndiakopoulos: Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization: https://t.co/ocAjfXT7ls
Echo chambers gonna echo ... New study reveals that exposure to opposing political views on Twitter can increase political polarization https://t.co/08bPLg8dCh
RT @ndiakopoulos: Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization: https://t.co/ocAjfXT7ls
cc @dongheejo68
Paper here: https://t.co/Z1LuzfndY2
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization: https://t.co/ocAjfXT7ls