↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Social contagion of ethnic hostility

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
35 tweeters
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Social contagion of ethnic hostility
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1720317115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Bauer, Jana Cahlíková, Julie Chytilová, Tomáš Želinský

Abstract

Interethnic conflicts often escalate rapidly. Why does the behavior of masses easily change from cooperation to aggression? This paper provides an experimental test of whether ethnic hostility is contagious. Using incentivized tasks, we measured willingness to sacrifice one's own resources to harm others among adolescents from a region with a history of animosities toward the Roma people, the largest ethnic minority in Europe. To identify the influence of peers, subjects made choices after observing either destructive or peaceful behavior of peers in the same task. We found that susceptibility to follow destructive behavior more than doubled when harm was targeted against Roma rather than against coethnics. When peers were peaceful, subjects did not discriminate. We observed very similar patterns in a norms-elicitation experiment: destructive behavior toward Roma was not generally rated as more socially appropriate than when directed at coethnics, but the ratings were more sensitive to social contexts. The findings may illuminate why ethnic hostilities can spread quickly, even in societies with few visible signs of interethnic hatred.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 34%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 23%
Social Sciences 21 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 22 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2021.
All research outputs
#194,449
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3,876
of 99,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,957
of 327,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#102
of 973 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 973 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.