The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Social contagion of ethnic hostility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1720317115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michal Bauer, Jana Cahlíková, Julie Chytilová, Tomáš Želinský |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 54% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 31% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2024.
All research outputs
#210,884
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3,950
of 104,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,638
of 344,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#88
of 974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.