The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 194 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1605782113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damián E. Blasi, Søren Wichmann, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler, Morten H. Christiansen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 8% |
| Japan | 7 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 138 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 138 | 71% |
| Scientists | 47 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 336 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 23% |
| Researcher | 63 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 82 | 22% |
| Unknown | 47 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 73 | 20% |
| Linguistics | 72 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 80 | 22% |
| Unknown | 71 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1364. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#9,898
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#307
of 104,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118
of 334,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4
of 923 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 923 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.