RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
@golftopoloTI デルタ以上にオミクロンのほうが、よりマスクの効果が高いという論文。 https://t.co/kfcZFY8KzH
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @BagheriMos: In large shops, at least in the typical ones in Germany, the ventilation is designed such that there is always a steady and…
In large shops, at least in the typical ones in Germany, the ventilation is designed such that there is always a steady and directed air flow. Meaning: the risk of infection comes from the people who are in the shop with you at the same time and is very lo
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
In our most recent work we show that aerosols do not accumulate in large indoor spaces and using results from our previous paper, https://t.co/iasF5KjCcS, we show that infection risk is quite low while people wear good quality and well fitting face masks.
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
@BrentAWilliams2 @VPrasadMDMPH If you don’t like this one, there are plenty of other studies that demonstrate efficacy of masks. https://t.co/iYAXcclOdC https://t.co/kOCVuowigR https://t.co/ZNCxw7VQV6 https://t.co/1hIoi7yZtQ
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
@danhyatt2 @LousieTashi @AlastairMcA30 Masks work, the more ppl wear masks the better against the virus. Study it: https://t.co/2qpxRLU5cE https://t.co/WyyDpNkwoi
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3% Same math as this @PNASNews study: https://t.co/DRhXGVdBLc https://t.co/PkxPP6yiky
@neweagle @msun_12 @Canigetawatwat @BioTurboNick @johnhawkinsrwn @News_MTorres @wusa This is the best of its type, a large-scale clustered RCT. There are other lab-based (better controlled) studies which have larger effect sizes. The biggest hurdles to ma
@oldman78530750 @DrPuerner "Aber nur im professionellen Bereich." Das ist einfach Nachplappern von #Schwachsinn gestreut durch Chanasit & Co. Selbst ein schlecht sitzende Maske ist deutlich besser als keine. Bitte mal hier nachlesen: https://t.co/zy6hC
@bundesexperte @nenacasc Lesen bildet. https://t.co/R6Rjle19fD
@cathie_wood The Max Planck Institute has come to same conclusion for FFP2: https://t.co/JSIUe7o3tf
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
@Nicoletta0602 @andrewbostom Is pandemic already over there? https://t.co/zcrMIZ7Pwe
13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against infection than N95 masks. . . https://t.co/94GlVe4Axt
@laski77 @TKL_Sanna_S Perussääntönä vain tiedelähteet käy. Esim meta-analyysi: https://t.co/sNp8E10B1Q konsepti: https://t.co/QmyIDiAtvx suojakyky: https://t.co/EN87MHbseV ja Tanskan mukaan suojaa yhä myös omicronissa https://t.co/2BYB5gy0Dy maskien sij
@Claire81040495 @percytheparrot @ToniaBuxton And another….
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
@ProfChrisMJones @cavemanjohn @linseymarr @jljcolorado There is this study/modell about mask efficacy. They compared FFP2(N95) and surgical masks if worn fitted and unfitted. The original modell was for Delta. It's published here (in English): https://t.c
@julianlewis2012 @j_g_allen Source control is much more effective. Universal masking w good masks is best. https://t.co/Wk5tsGv1mW
RT @AnnaKorhonen3: FFP2-maskit ovat jopa tehokkaampia Omicronia kuin Deltaa vastaan.