RT @CassyOConnorMP: Tas Public Health *refuses* to act on the evidence that surgical masks are not up to the Omicron challenge. Teachers w…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @comradeddie: @green917 @acony_belle Thanks for your opinion random shithead on the internet, but the science says you are wrong https:/…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @bej_grannyff: @CSGOKEULE04 @1900HO Märchen von Querdullis spiegeln keine Tatsachen wieder. https://t.co/O8CnwBpuEa
@agresifgerdedan @natural655 @OpDrBilgehan E tabi n95 maskeler daha iyi koruma sağlıyor. Yanlış takılan FFP2 maskeleri bile, doğru şekilde takılan cerrahi maskelerden virüse karşı çok daha iyi koruma sağlıyor. https://t.co/IQVRmx84Nb
Masking is more important for Omicron than for Delta
@nntaleb Nice. See also:
@green917 @acony_belle Thanks for your opinion random shithead on the internet, but the science says you are wrong https://t.co/iquZ3jMUvq
@CSGOKEULE04 @1900HO Märchen von Querdullis spiegeln keine Tatsachen wieder. https://t.co/O8CnwBpuEa
@pointlessPhD @JordanSchachtel https://t.co/MPzxVBWMc4 Obviously, we know now that N95 and KN95 masks are the best ones to use, but any mask is better than no mask
@IndiaCapitalist @Pai_d2 @ngm_de_monoculo @msoares Eita, desculpe se ofendi vosso douto saber. Então vou citar algo melhor que manuais e apostilas, segue um artigo de publicação recente. Como disse, passa longe de uma PFF2, mas certamente é melhor que usar
@BlackMadness317 @knockers41 @notcapnamerica @DrLeanaWen @wolfblitzer Doesn’t have to be,
@MarvSauer @DevsBee @jonjkerr There you go https://t.co/hYkFDZdph4
@brifkandrei Masks work ⬇️ even with #Omicron
RT @ColinKinner: 13/ We also know that surgical masks provide massively less (according to one study, 75 times less) protection against inf…
RT @yaneerbaryam: Original article: https://t.co/2zXxbwrQCq
@Alchemi94339690 @Senat_Hamburg @Gesundheit_HH Hier geht es zur Studie 👇. https://t.co/b2CpkBZrUR
@RodneyCorbine @thoughtfultom @dneuerer Warum sollten die Chirurgischen und FFP2-Masken, die vorher zum Schutz eingesetzt werden, plötzlich nicht mehr Schützen? https://t.co/W5zX86oUZx https://t.co/MhQ7V7i2qv
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
Jadi Bapak dan Ibu mari tetap jaga proses dan masker sebisa mungkin.
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @selise: @JuliaRaifman Masking together much better! From paper linked below: If only the susceptible person wears a FFP2 mask, the up…
@LaPartDuChaos @double_emotions Je n'ai pas connaissance de l'étude que vous mentionnez. La dernière dont j'ai eu connaissance : https://t.co/fWe2QQa8tc
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @PervVerb: 새부리형이면서 코눌러주는 장치가 감염자/피감염자 둘다 있으면 0.14% 둘다 평판형이면 코눌러주는 장치있어도 10.4%까지 감염. 감염자가 평판형을 쓰면 감염력이 매우 높아지고 피감염자가 코누르는게 있는 새부리형이면 감염력이…
RT @PervVerb: 새부리형이면서 코눌러주는 장치가 감염자/피감염자 둘다 있으면 0.14% 둘다 평판형이면 코눌러주는 장치있어도 10.4%까지 감염. 감염자가 평판형을 쓰면 감염력이 매우 높아지고 피감염자가 코누르는게 있는 새부리형이면 감염력이…
@i_petersen @SGriffin_Lab @Kateliveco1G @MaplePonds @MarvinH2_G2 @jneill @RohanChindooroy @apsmunro @R_Hughes1 @sqrpshr @TAH_Sci @danielgoyal @BinitaKane @NHSEngland @UKHSA Masks work ⬇️ Why would we NOT want to avoid infection of naive as much as possible
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @CassyOConnorMP: Tas Public Health *refuses* to act on the evidence that surgical masks are not up to the Omicron challenge. Teachers w…
RT @CassyOConnorMP: Tas Public Health *refuses* to act on the evidence that surgical masks are not up to the Omicron challenge. Teachers w…
Tas Public Health *refuses* to act on the evidence that surgical masks are not up to the Omicron challenge. Teachers will be sent in to classrooms with outdated mask guidance on Wednesday. Why isn’t govt doing everything possible to stem infections &
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: I don't often use this term, but the Bagheri et al paper on mask efficacy is a game changer. Brilliantly summarised by…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
@JanneSarvanne @MartinScheininF On paljonkin hyötyä. https://t.co/r9TrXrAUJG
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
RT @RevivalCare: @apmalong @BogochIsaac Sharing an excellent thread on masking protection. https://t.co/rU6dFDk7XA
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
@neilmack_the @TimothyPSmith7 @bommrob @JohnCleese No, but this study does. You all (including some politicians) misinterpreted the correct statement in 2020, where scientists said: "we don't have scientific prove they work". By now we have: they work.
@bommrob @JohnCleese Why are you lying? What is your agenda in clear-out telling a lie? There have been multiple studies throughout the last two years - the most recent one I attached for you - proving the effect of medical and FFP2 masks. https://t.co/hY
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
@MattGertz Also ⬇️ thread
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: Fascinating study suggesting universal masking MORE important for Omicron than Delta because of differences in URT vs…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
@HeikkiRay Viime aikoina vastaan tulleita, maskien hyödyt todistaneita twiittejä 2/ PNAS:ssa julkaistusta tutkimuksesta - oranssi väri on kasvoille säädetty FFP2, violetti kasvoille teipattu (täysin tiivis FFP2) https://t.co/2cMv6gUDu5 https://t.co/vCJ31
@ales___1 @RomanKratochvl1 @VeronikaSedlk10 Samozřejmě, že funkci roušek lze doložit (viz třeba studie https://t.co/awqxd4FMxd atd atd). Hostomsky není dezinformator, říká svůj názor (stejně jako když jasně podporuje vakcíny), na který má právo stejně jako
@apmalong @BogochIsaac Sharing an excellent thread on masking protection. https://t.co/rU6dFDk7XA
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jlowijk: Ik begrijp niet waarom er zoveel gewag wordt gemaakt van handhaafbaarheid wat betreft sluitingstijden, terwijl dat blijkbaar g…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
@trishgreenhalgh @kprather88 See also this study published in PNAS. https://t.co/sZHSs9KWei
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
Ik begrijp niet waarom er zoveel gewag wordt gemaakt van handhaafbaarheid wat betreft sluitingstijden, terwijl dat blijkbaar geen rol heeft gespeeld in het geval van mondkapjes. Het superieure FFP2-masker is veel makkelijker te herkennen dan de verschillen
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…
RT @jljcolorado: 4/ So comparison if EVERYONE: - No mask: 100% - Cloth mask: (1-.56)^2 = 19% - Surgical: (1-.66)^2 = 12% - N95 / KN95: 3%…