@DrPuerner Lesen bildet #Maske https://t.co/VfFXN8P22c
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @tomtomtomy3: 結局「マスクのベンチテストデータ」しか見てねえじゃんwww自ら、「マスクオタク」であることを表明してるようなもんだよね。 工学的にはマスクは、間違ったフィルタエレメントの使い方、だから。医者はマスクメーカにいいようにやられてるんだよ https…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
結局「マスクのベンチテストデータ」しか見てねえじゃんwww自ら、「マスクオタク」であることを表明してるようなもんだよね。 工学的にはマスクは、間違ったフィルタエレメントの使い方、だから。医者はマスクメーカにいいようにやられてるんだよ https://t.co/T1wORJXpkv
マスクの目的は何だったっけね?感染を減らすんじゃなかったのか?他の様々な要因の影響を受けマスク単体の効果が感染者数には表れない。そういうのを「効果がない」って言うのだと思うがね
@tomtomtomy3 読解力皆無なのか マスク単体の効果は"感染者数"では測定できないと言っているんだよ 条件設定をしてマスクの効果を測ってる論文なんて腐るほどあるんだから読んで勉強してね これ読んだ?読んでないでしょ https://t.co/coenspjbqF
@kenichining @0JAJsuJGfNBH3Z4 飛沫感染だけでなく空気感染(エアロゾル感染)も考慮した検証結果。感染リスクの高い順に和訳を置くね https://t.co/18oFS98AY3 ●感染者と非感染者がともにマスクなしで1.5mの距離で対面会話をした場合 ⇒非感染者の感染リスクは1分半で90%に到達した。
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@Rehm601 Ich muss es nicht glauben, es ist mehrfach wissenschaftlich belegt: https://t.co/ZrKBHTgUCa - https://t.co/yd5AxM7HED - https://t.co/nKJW0UV3nU … eine wissenschaftlich belegte Studie, die Ihre Aussage der „Glaubenssache“ belegt, gibt es nicht.
@tomtomtomy3 漏れるに決まってるやろ笑笑 エアロゾル感染の元となる飛沫を減らすことで感染の可能性を"減らす"だけですよ 漏れたら感染予防効果ないと思っちゃってるのね 視覚的に分かりやすいのはこの論文ですよ 是非読んでお勉強してね https://t.co/coenspjbqF
@happy_rick7 @ReesiePeacie Nothing is 100%....it's all layers of protection. Yes an individual mask works...combination of masks works better. While in public settings, we should minimize risk of spread as much as possible to increase equity for all. Bas
@Queen_Of_Light @CuccaF2012 @ella11378673 @berlinerzeitung @DKGev @BAEKaktuell @Karl_Lauterbach @janoschdahmen @MarcoBuschmann Nach der Studie des Max-Planck-Instituts gibt es selbst dann noch einen gewissen Schutz, wenn die Maske nicht zu 100% korrekt get
@CuccaF2012 @Queen_Of_Light @berlinerzeitung @DKGev @BAEKaktuell @Karl_Lauterbach @janoschdahmen @MarcoBuschmann Falsch. Es gibt zum einen durchaus Belege, dass die Maske schützt, zum anderen ist der Schutz dann am höchsten, wenn sie eben nicht nur von 1 P
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@jabbajabbajembe @Claude__Cat I find it strange that there are a lot of people involved with mask science who disagree with you. This study, for instance: https://t.co/fhleEQjMtI
@grossgaertner Offensichtlich haben Sie keine Ahnung wozu die von Ihnen abgebildete Maske benötigt wird. Jedenfalls nicht für Aerosole. FFP2 Masken schützen sehr wohl und sehr gut vor #CovidIsNotOver wie von MPG Wissenschaftlern gezeigt wurde https://t.co
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@Birthday_gohan @MiLcTy_ マスクに効果があるのは明らかです。https://t.co/7qYsR5BGP1
RT @AdultSpotDiffer: デルタ以上にオミクロンのほうが、よりマスクの効果が高いよ!できればFFP2クラスの良い不織布マスクをぴったりつけようね、という話。すでにアクセプトされた論文の改変です。 オミクロンは上気道が感染の場の主体であることから導き出されるお話…
@SchneidGabriel @Listenreich1 @Frankenfreddy @lovelyropes https://t.co/CiJkruCEhH Vertraue so einer Quelle mehr als nen random dude auf Twitter der behauptet es gäbe keine Studien…aber hey, might just be me.
@KatjaPekrun @kevinnbass @guardian There is good reason to think that non-fitted N95s substantially reduce the risk of transmission https://t.co/kEiWDCjiRF The vaccines *are* efffective in reducing (not 100% preventing) infection — eg. the bivalent booster
@pollyrowena @VirginiaBuysse @DrShannaK Thanks for setting a good example. Re: "only if 100% of others are wearing", you may be interested in this study that showed a 20% per hour chance of getting COVID for 1-way FFP2 masking (talking with unmasked infect
「2021年段階でのレポート」、な( ゚∋゚) https://t.co/OFfw7lNAJM
@FitTestMyPlanet @christy868 Agreed. I was surprised that double masking did not consistently give me the negative results I was told to expect. This study of FFP2 masks found that a surgical over them reduced fit on average, but improved it for some. h
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@ljmzwaan @mkeulemans Ik neem aan dat Google werkt bij jou, maar hierbij: https://t.co/yA8TNEkYOK
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @lgoshen: @DB_Bahn @annamana_ Studie zum Infektionsrisiko bei einseitigem Maskentragen: https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
@DB_Bahn @annamana_ Studie zum Infektionsrisiko bei einseitigem Maskentragen: https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
@Agi23822292 @Olihtan @SWRAktuellBW Bullshit. Beides. Die Maske schützt https://t.co/NbTXrd9ORs und die Impfung verursacht (im Gegensatz zum Virus selbst) keine Blutgerinnsel https://t.co/l3IeFdJeZl
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@ryangrim @julia_doubleday You’re not following the science. I don’t need to wear a mask, as a vulnerable person, more than I need YOU to wear a mask.
#MEDiCAL @MReserach @JINN40774681 @sherlock_last
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@akgmx @PSHolstein @StrehlkeM Das ist immer noch Unsinn. Die Unterschiede je nach gutem oder schlechtem Sitz der Maske sind bekannt und werden natürlich in Labortests berücksichtigt. Die Anpassung des Nasenblechs ist bereits >90% effektiv bei den meiste
@GournayEddy @GuillaumeBarucq @barriere_dr 6 études Théorie/Modélisation > Pas d'étude pratique groupe avec/sans, ne démontrent rien https://t.co/cP4KErjV0B https://t.co/kstm7JqHum https://t.co/2ebjoCoEEs https://t.co/n28OuOe2kX https://t.co/YdD65U7xcz
RT @FranceskoNew: E sì, usare le mascherine è utile, anche con Omicron 👇
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: 5/ They also looked at the effect of fit on TIL (total inward leakage). "By simply adjusting the mask nosepiece to the n…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @manopsi: หน้ากากสำคัญกว่า social distancing ในพื้นที่ปิด ถ้าทุกคนใส่หมด ต่อให้คนติดเชื้อใส่ surgical mask ไม่ฟิตมากแล้วพูด ๆ ๆ ๆ โอกาสแ…
マスクの有無とコロナ感染の関連性、感染者がマスクすることの重要性が大きいんだな。自分がマスクしてても感染者がノーマスクだと感染リスク90%になる! https://t.co/FgQCSkV1Tk An upper bound on one-to-one exposure to infectious human respiratory particles | PNAS https://t.co/yIkBKDNye3
RT @trishgreenhalgh: I don't often use this term, but the Bagheri et al paper on mask efficacy is a game changer. Brilliantly summarised by…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @FranceskoNew: E sì, usare le mascherine è utile, anche con Omicron 👇
RT @lgoshen: @machmalblutbild Siehe Bagheri et al. (2021): Bis zu 20% Infektionsrisiko für die Person, die eine FFP2 trägt, wenn die infekt…
@i_petersen @Antonio_Caramia @KiraCzarczynska @FranceskoNew @masking__mama @ChiefStevieP @taipan168 https://t.co/QVs8ZoA2Cq read this maybe before your next false informed post?
RT @FranceskoNew: E sì, usare le mascherine è utile, anche con Omicron 👇
RT @lgoshen: @machmalblutbild Siehe Bagheri et al. (2021): Bis zu 20% Infektionsrisiko für die Person, die eine FFP2 trägt, wenn die infekt…
RT @lgoshen: @machmalblutbild Siehe Bagheri et al. (2021): Bis zu 20% Infektionsrisiko für die Person, die eine FFP2 trägt, wenn die infekt…
RT @lgoshen: @machmalblutbild Siehe Bagheri et al. (2021): Bis zu 20% Infektionsrisiko für die Person, die eine FFP2 trägt, wenn die infekt…
RT @lgoshen: @machmalblutbild Siehe Bagheri et al. (2021): Bis zu 20% Infektionsrisiko für die Person, die eine FFP2 trägt, wenn die infekt…
@machmalblutbild Siehe Bagheri et al. (2021): Bis zu 20% Infektionsrisiko für die Person, die eine FFP2 trägt, wenn die infektiöse Person keine Maske trägt. ➡️Deshalb ist eine Maskenpflicht so wichtig! https://t.co/4KyOAdsDdL
«Our results show that social distancing alone without masking is associated with a very high risk of infection, especially in situations where infectious is speaking». https://t.co/S5y7aYB5z9
E sì, usare le mascherine è utile, anche con Omicron 👇
RT @Antonio_Caramia: @i_petersen @angeliquedeberg @KiraCzarczynska @FranceskoNew @masking__mama @ChiefStevieP @taipan168 This is a lie! Pl…
RT @Antonio_Caramia: @i_petersen @KiraCzarczynska @angeliquedeberg @FranceskoNew @masking__mama @ChiefStevieP @taipan168 Phisics laws still…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
@i_petersen @Antonio_Caramia @KiraCzarczynska @FranceskoNew @masking__mama @ChiefStevieP @taipan168 https://t.co/QVs8ZoA2Cq maybe read this. You lie! Evidence says different and you are wrong about masks in omicron era.
@i_petersen @angeliquedeberg @KiraCzarczynska @FranceskoNew @masking__mama @ChiefStevieP @taipan168 This is a lie! Please read this paper! 👇 Masks are more effective with Omicron than with Delta! 👇 https://t.co/uRrotdzaSQ
@i_petersen @KiraCzarczynska @angeliquedeberg @FranceskoNew @masking__mama @ChiefStevieP @taipan168 Phisics laws still works for viruses, too! Then, about Delta and Omicron, try to read this study; you'll understand that mask work BETTER for Omicron than
The science is in! From a Ph.D, so you know they just followed orders. Japan masked up like crazy. And has high infections. FOIA of Dutch gov documents show that masks were nothing but a behavioral study. #FakeScience “masks stop the virus” 👇👇👇
@Henk47806375 @_SebB_ @CEOTeamChaos Mondmaskers werken.
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
4/n #KeresPandemia2023 Coronavirus encontrado en muestras del 96% de los vuelos. En total, "Se detectó SarsCoV-2 en 288 muestras", o el 95,7% de TODOS los vuelo Mascarillas #FFP2 - importante su buen uso y conocimiento . INFORME https://t.co/lu8MDUvZ7p
RT @HuffmanLabDU: Nice mask study ~consistent w/ prev. results. https://t.co/J5fczlbZhS "... face masks sign. reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-…
@wavewaiter @lotzof_gas @MyNameisDawn2 @DrJBhattacharya @mtlrn_1 It most certainly is a model based on a variety of assumptions. We have years of data showing masking doesn't work on real humans in the real world, where people wear ill-fitting masks, they
RT @drpaulmorgan: Excellent thread on the effectiveness of wearing a facemask in reducing risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.