Interesting study on the presence or absence of gender bias in hiring for STEM: “National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track” https://t.co/9js6RcFbpT
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
Dismantling myths and propaganda.
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
#RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launching careers in academic science" https://t.co/cr2pV087BO
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
#tueindhoven, #vrouwen zijn aardig goed bezig, zonder jullie #waanzin.
RT @jordanbpeterson: The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launchin…
The facts on gender-based hiring in the STEM fields: "These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launching careers in academic science" https://t.co/U4v1ItioqH
RT @JonathanVerumis: When controlled for experience and education, a 2:1 hiring bias in favour of female applicants within STEM field tenur…
When controlled for experience and education, a 2:1 hiring bias in favour of female applicants within STEM field tenure tracks becomes apparent. https://t.co/OutNB9bR6N #WomenInSTEM #Science https://t.co/1aN8MmnQB7
@gmjackgm @NGrossman81 @roderickgraham This is my point, am I missing something? The conclusion that is largely shared by "grievance studies" adherents. Are disproven in these studies. I'm not claiming that it never happens, rather the default position sho
@PyhaTanja @ivanpuopolo @TuomasEnbuske Tuon tutkimusmetodolgia vaikuttaa tiivistelmän perustella jokseenkin samalta kuin pari päivää sitten linkkaamani (Williams, Cesi), joka dumattiin Twitterraadin toimesta huonoksi tieteeksi, koska asetelma ei kuvaa real
@TenaciousE5 @DrShepherd2013 @LeighMunchakWX @windbarb https://t.co/859Np8mMNv studies that agree with the prevailing point of view are not challenged as much. Studies that show contrary evidence are given intense review. We have to do that. But we should
@PyhaTanja @ivanpuopolo @TuomasEnbuske Onko viitata tutkimuksiin? Ainakin USA:ta löytyy myös toisenlaista dataa. https://t.co/VuqAwSRSU9
@ivanpuopolo @PyhaTanja @TuomasEnbuske "Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles (single, married, divorced), with the e
Similar name-swap studies have come to different conclusions. Moss-Racusin et al. found similar results when using fake lab manager applications, but Williams et al. reported greater hireability for fake women faculty candidates. https://t.co/Ykg9VZ5y1x h
@ChadSinclairYVR @bat__go @seis_matters @jesswade @tigerinstemm @GilesPalaeoLab The probably best study is this natural experiment which showed that women in academic STEM-fields have a 2-1 faculty preference to hiring women https://t.co/c8tEYuZ49n
@jesswade @tigerinstemm @GilesPalaeoLab Okey, here is one natural experiment in academic STEM-fields found women were favored 2-1 https://t.co/c8tEYuZ49n
@amyvpellegrini More recent and higher powered studies strongly contradict that result: https://t.co/QZdF5TUuqP https://t.co/G3nlSiUyWJ https://t.co/Wi6UsEkNMN
RT @TOOEdit: Thread that should be read by anyone who still thinks women are discriminated against in academia https://t.co/AZTpik6vYq
RT @TOOEdit: Thread that should be read by anyone who still thinks women are discriminated against in academia https://t.co/AZTpik6vYq
RT @TOOEdit: Thread that should be read by anyone who still thinks women are discriminated against in academia https://t.co/AZTpik6vYq
RT @TOOEdit: Thread that should be read by anyone who still thinks women are discriminated against in academia https://t.co/AZTpik6vYq
RT @TOOEdit: Thread that should be read by anyone who still thinks women are discriminated against in academia https://t.co/AZTpik6vYq
RT @TOOEdit: Thread that should be read by anyone who still thinks women are discriminated against in academia https://t.co/AZTpik6vYq
RT @TOOEdit: Thread that should be read by anyone who still thinks women are discriminated against in academia https://t.co/AZTpik6vYq
RT @TOOEdit: Thread that should be read by anyone who still thinks women are discriminated against in academia https://t.co/AZTpik6vYq
@DinaPomeranz @sarahmrose @Scientific_Bird 2:1 bias favoring women in hiring in STEM https://t.co/79A8A47sof https://t.co/evsrwPRooK
@bat__go @Scientific_Bird @PsychRabble @cgl_119 @BMatB @joelwatsonfish @AJPrincep I suspect it's this study: https://t.co/VCQWbGP17V It's very hard to explain why a field is mostly-male if the system promotes women much more, but I do have a few explanat
@celestelabedz Good news: Scientists prefer women over equally qualified men by 2:1 for tenure track positions. (Newer, more high powered, larger difference and for more highly qualified candidates than the lab manager study) https://t.co/NuX5TCSkdZ
@24michelle Michelle, a new field study published last week found blatant discrimination of women in STEM: https://t.co/KKLWfwoozw
@TheTattooedProf @kellerhistory @Val_Mueller_ASU When one selectively picks evidence, it accumulates pretty quickly. https://t.co/Is7nt8xKg4
@Val_Mueller_ASU Based on PNAS study at https://t.co/NNxlNCDXyc, it's quite possible that the (current?) bias for hiring female candidates leads to lower quality of female hires and subsequent poorer evals by students. Once the best ones survive the tenure
@Hartmann404 @MaryRobinette @alexxthegreat https://t.co/7xbivpJ7eJ This is a study by a Feminist Organisation.
@SciBry @Peter_Conradi @Charles4Freedom @thesundaytimes Dear @SciBry regarding the barriers, you may find this research done a few years ago by 2 Cornell psychology professors interesting: https://t.co/OV3tRbyrLQ
@celestelabedz There’s a 2:1 hiring preference for women over men in STEM faculties although (depending on the STEM field) there are more men than women. https://t.co/NY3uWW23n5
@SciBry @Peter_Conradi @thesundaytimes The best example of bias against men would be from the PNAS study showing 2:1 faculty preference for women (https://t.co/mqhy2qodpj). This was met with a lot of anger from the scientific community. However, this anger
@physicsmatt you may also find this research done a few years ago by 2 Cornell psychology professors interesting: https://t.co/OV3tRbyrLQ
@philipcball Dear Philip, what, however, if what this guy claims is true even though it is contrary to your ideology? https://t.co/OV3tRbyrLQ
RT @tomtodd: @jordanbpeterson This is an interesting study on the topic https://t.co/3Yut6JnH9Z
RT @tomtodd: @jordanbpeterson This is an interesting study on the topic https://t.co/3Yut6JnH9Z
RT @tomtodd: @jordanbpeterson This is an interesting study on the topic https://t.co/3Yut6JnH9Z
@jordanbpeterson This is an interesting study on the topic https://t.co/3Yut6JnH9Z
But the idea there is a systemic bias against women in 2019 is absolutely preposterous, and there are a few studies that show this in certain contexts https://t.co/UjRtEctj3q https://t.co/5yjwaQ2bzW https://t.co/edQeZ8ZFIj
Still others have found reviewers may even favour members of underrepresented groups. For example, see this paper by Williams & Ceci about faculty candidates. https://t.co/GP7iRIdKqD
@tomash_j @primalpoly Many activists exhibit angry reactions to data that demonstrates improvements or progress in the very area in which they purport to seek such improvements, such as in this paper: https://t.co/x8c8KD6uKj
@Norbsen @mendezfe Undoubtedly, women in research have been discriminated. Yet, current evidence seems mixed: some favor women, some favor men, some neither. https://t.co/CeHbJO5WYs https://t.co/fjK9v3tUkW https://t.co/WV9HFO4ENq https://t.co/a0N0Boao
@joanplanas Y no es un caso aislado. Según este estudio en EEUU las mujeres cobran como media más que los hombres en las STEM: https://t.co/eb9elYzEAD
Me diréis: es solo un caso, es solo un caso. Pues va a ser que no, en las STEM las mujeres cobran más que los hombres por el mismo trabajo según este estudio: https://t.co/eb9elYzEAD
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
Pero claro, si esto fuese cierto ¿Que hacemos con todas esas personas que han construido su carrera profesional en torno a un dogma que se demuestra falso?
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
RT @pitiklinov: Hay razonable evidencia de que el sesgo en las carreras STEM (ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería, matemáticas) es a favor de l…
@Rabpsody @segoviag969 @pitiklinov En la misma revista también se publicó un estudio parecido en el que observaron que con el mismo currículum es dos veces más probable que contraten a alguien como profesor titular de universidad si es mujer. https://t.co
@akiniemi @TeemuSintonen @TereSammallahti Fakta kuitenkin on että naisia suositaan ja he etenevät pienemmillä meeriteillä . Aloita vaikka tästä. https://t.co/5lZpp5e94v
@KelseyTuoc It is also out of line with studies on hiring bias in STEM: https://t.co/8lxyphoH50 And with studies of hiring bias in general
RT @CleoProtogerou: Good news for women in academia. US-based hiring experiments, supported by national real-life data, reveal a 2:1 facult…
@thebandb Of deze https://t.co/eVDAyYG2yR
@SylviaFysica idd, men tegenwoordig in STEM zelfs observeren dat vrouwen DUBBEL zo veel kans hebben dan mannen, met hetzelfde CV https://t.co/eVDAyYG2yR
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
Zo simpel als dit is het.
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @mboudry: Deze campagne streeft naar 50/50 evenwicht in alle academische geledingen. Dat is dwaas. We moeten discriminatie bestrijden, m…
RT @vaneylenv: We moeten discriminatie bestrijden. Tot zover ben ik het eens met @mboudry. Ik denk dat we daarmee al een heel eind verder k…