| Title |
Conservation cobenefits from air pollution regulation: Evidence from birds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2013568117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuanning Liang, Ivan Rudik, Eric Yongchen Zou, Alison Johnston, Amanda D Rodewald, Catherine L Kling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 9% |
| Canada | 9 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Uganda | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 42 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 57% |
| Scientists | 29 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 326. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#104,558
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,288
of 103,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,994
of 528,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#51
of 1,024 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,024 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.