↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Physician–patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
114 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
1968 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Physician–patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1913405117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brad N. Greenwood, Rachel R. Hardeman, Laura Huang, Aaron Sojourner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,968 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 16 9%
Other 54 30%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 24%
Social Sciences 22 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Psychology 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 43 24%
Unknown 38 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2266. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,638
of 17,138,809 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64
of 88,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198
of 305,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7
of 1,109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,138,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.