↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Physician–patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 92,056)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
167 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
2027 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
Physician–patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1913405117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brad N. Greenwood, Rachel R. Hardeman, Laura Huang, Aaron Sojourner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,027 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 257 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 11%
Other 22 9%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 51 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 24%
Social Sciences 30 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Psychology 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 71 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2767. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,493
of 18,960,910 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#50
of 92,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151
of 309,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4
of 1,106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,960,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.