↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Physician–patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 104,462)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
470 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
519 Mendeley
Title
Physician–patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1913405117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brad N. Greenwood, Rachel R. Hardeman, Laura Huang, Aaron Sojourner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,077 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 519 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 519 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 10%
Researcher 47 9%
Student > Master 44 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 8%
Other 39 8%
Other 111 21%
Unknown 183 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 19%
Social Sciences 58 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 7%
Psychology 20 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Other 86 17%
Unknown 210 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,176
of 26,156,431 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#34
of 104,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80
of 430,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2
of 1,091 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,156,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,091 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.