| Title |
Physiological responses to gravity in an insect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1915424117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jon F. Harrison, Khaled Adjerid, Anelia Kassi, C. Jaco Klok, John M. VandenBrooks, Meghan E. Duell, Jacob B. Campbell, Stav Talal, Christopher D. Abdo, Kamel Fezzaa, Hodjat Pendar, John J. Socha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 43% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Ghana | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 24 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#307,664
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,687
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,679
of 467,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#123
of 904 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 904 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.