Title |
Programmable active kirigami metasheets with more freedom of actuation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1906435116 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yichao Tang, Yanbin Li, Yaoye Hong, Shu Yang, Jie Yin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
Researcher | 11 | 8% |
Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 45 | 34% |
Materials Science | 12 | 9% |
Unspecified | 7 | 5% |
Chemistry | 6 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Unknown | 47 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#562,434
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,858
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,824
of 469,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#217
of 913 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 913 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.