| Title |
Extracellular RNA in a single droplet of human serum reflects physiologic and disease states
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1908252116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zixu Zhou, Qiuyang Wu, Zhangming Yan, Haizi Zheng, Chien-Ju Chen, Yuan Liu, Zhijie Qi, Riccardo Calandrelli, Zhen Chen, Shu Chien, H Irene Su, Sheng Zhong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 34% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 52% |
| Scientists | 54 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#469,965
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8,247
of 103,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,635
of 351,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#159
of 932 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 932 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.