↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Earth history and the passerine superradiation

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
319 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
127 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
467 Mendeley
Title
Earth history and the passerine superradiation
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1813206116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl H. Oliveros, Daniel J. Field, Daniel T. Ksepka, F. Keith Barker, Alexandre Aleixo, Michael J. Andersen, Per Alström, Brett W. Benz, Edward L. Braun, Michael J. Braun, Gustavo A. Bravo, Robb T. Brumfield, R. Terry Chesser, Santiago Claramunt, Joel Cracraft, Andrés M. Cuervo, Elizabeth P. Derryberry, Travis C. Glenn, Michael G. Harvey, Peter A. Hosner, Leo Joseph, Rebecca T. Kimball, Andrew L. Mack, Colin M. Miskelly, A. Townsend Peterson, Mark B. Robbins, Frederick H. Sheldon, Luís Fábio Silveira, Brian Tilston Smith, Noor D. White, Robert G. Moyle, Brant C. Faircloth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 319 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 467 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 467 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 16%
Student > Bachelor 68 15%
Student > Master 60 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 7%
Other 84 18%
Unknown 76 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 216 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 12%
Environmental Science 41 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 5%
Unspecified 7 1%
Other 34 7%
Unknown 91 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 416. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#62,803
of 23,910,532 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,575
of 100,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,318
of 354,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#42
of 1,005 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,910,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,005 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.