| Title |
Memory and resource tracking drive blue whale migrations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1819031116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Briana Abrahms, Elliott L. Hazen, Ellen O. Aikens, Matthew S. Savoca, Jeremy A. Goldbogen, Steven J. Bograd, Michael G. Jacox, Ladd M. Irvine, Daniel M. Palacios, Bruce R. Mate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 66% |
| Scientists | 27 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 389 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 17% |
| Researcher | 61 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 99 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 135 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 77 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Unknown | 124 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 309. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#114,731
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,445
of 104,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,376
of 369,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#59
of 1,067 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,067 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.