↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
391 Mendeley
Title
Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1803615115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexey A Kotlobay, Karen S Sarkisyan, Yuliana A Mokrushina, Marina Marcet-Houben, Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya, Nadezhda M Markina, Louisa Gonzalez Somermeyer, Andrey Y Gorokhovatsky, Andrey Vvedensky, Konstantin V Purtov, Valentin N Petushkov, Natalja S Rodionova, Tatiana V Chepurnyh, Liliia I Fakhranurova, Elena B Guglya, Rustam Ziganshin, Aleksandra S Tsarkova, Zinaida M Kaskova, Victoria Shender, Maxim Abakumov, Tatiana O Abakumova, Inna S Povolotskaya, Fedor M Eroshkin, Andrey G Zaraisky, Alexander S Mishin, Sergey V Dolgov, Tatiana Y Mitiouchkina, Eugene P Kopantzev, Hans E Waldenmaier, Anderson G Oliveira, Yuichi Oba, Ekaterina Barsova, Ekaterina A Bogdanova, Toni Gabaldón, Cassius V Stevani, Sergey Lukyanov, Ivan V Smirnov, Josef I Gitelson, Fyodor A Kondrashov, Ilia V Yampolsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 540 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 391 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 18%
Researcher 59 15%
Student > Bachelor 58 15%
Student > Master 41 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 4%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 102 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 113 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 18%
Chemistry 29 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 114 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 567. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#42,660
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,153
of 103,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#774
of 448,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18
of 889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.