| Title |
Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1803615115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexey A. Kotlobay, Karen S. Sarkisyan, Yuliana A. Mokrushina, Marina Marcet-Houben, Ekaterina O. Serebrovskaya, Nadezhda M. Markina, Louisa Gonzalez Somermeyer, Andrey Y. Gorokhovatsky, Andrey Vvedensky, Konstantin V. Purtov, Valentin N. Petushkov, Natalja S. Rodionova, Tatiana V. Chepurnyh, Liliia I. Fakhranurova, Elena B. Guglya, Rustam Ziganshin, Aleksandra S. Tsarkova, Zinaida M. Kaskova, Victoria Shender, Maxim Abakumov, Tatiana O. Abakumova, Inna S. Povolotskaya, Fedor M. Eroshkin, Andrey G. Zaraisky, Alexander S. Mishin, Sergey V. Dolgov, Tatiana Y. Mitiouchkina, Eugene P. Kopantzev, Hans E. Waldenmaier, Anderson G. Oliveira, Yuichi Oba, Ekaterina Barsova, Ekaterina A. Bogdanova, Toni Gabaldón, Cassius V. Stevani, Sergey Lukyanov, Ivan V. Smirnov, Josef I. Gitelson, Fyodor A. Kondrashov, Ilia V. Yampolsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 546 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 92 | 17% |
| Japan | 65 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 33 | 6% |
| France | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 14 | 3% |
| Germany | 8 | 1% |
| Spain | 7 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 52 | 10% |
| Unknown | 247 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 353 | 65% |
| Scientists | 177 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 374 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 18% |
| Researcher | 61 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 12% |
| Unknown | 91 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 110 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 29 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 11% |
| Unknown | 103 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 563. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#40,890
of 24,940,046 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,110
of 102,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#774
of 449,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#19
of 886 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,940,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 886 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.