↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
Title
Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1803615115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexey A. Kotlobay, Karen S. Sarkisyan, Yuliana A. Mokrushina, Marina Marcet-Houben, Ekaterina O. Serebrovskaya, Nadezhda M. Markina, Louisa Gonzalez Somermeyer, Andrey Y. Gorokhovatsky, Andrey Vvedensky, Konstantin V. Purtov, Valentin N. Petushkov, Natalja S. Rodionova, Tatiana V. Chepurnyh, Liliia I. Fakhranurova, Elena B. Guglya, Rustam Ziganshin, Aleksandra S. Tsarkova, Zinaida M. Kaskova, Victoria Shender, Maxim Abakumov, Tatiana O. Abakumova, Inna S. Povolotskaya, Fedor M. Eroshkin, Andrey G. Zaraisky, Alexander S. Mishin, Sergey V. Dolgov, Tatiana Y. Mitiouchkina, Eugene P. Kopantzev, Hans E. Waldenmaier, Anderson G. Oliveira, Yuichi Oba, Ekaterina Barsova, Ekaterina A. Bogdanova, Toni Gabaldón, Cassius V. Stevani, Sergey Lukyanov, Ivan V. Smirnov, Josef I. Gitelson, Fyodor A. Kondrashov, Ilia V. Yampolsky

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 574 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 348 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 19%
Student > Bachelor 54 16%
Researcher 50 14%
Student > Master 38 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 76 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 106 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 19%
Chemistry 29 8%
Unspecified 8 2%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 87 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 559. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#35,192
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,013
of 98,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#742
of 437,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#20
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.