Voxelgate. 1,000s of papers on fMRI affected. https://t.co/kJP4vRfk6f
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates: https://t.co/7xmVwxsRYA
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates: https://t.co/q3oaqPz9X8 https://t.co/Dr2P3baz1i
#Neuroimaging: the need to validate the statistical methods used in fMRI studies https://t.co/1umetydghq #imaging #brain
New study questions interpretation of thousands of studies on #Neuroimaging https://t.co/WtEpLiw7Ay
@kqedforum recent sesarch shows fMRI turned out to be mostly incorrect https://t.co/Oo8q9DY5qD
Missed It? Cluster failure: Why #fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. #PNAS: https://t.co/ZalAm9rGju
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/OfJYN0TveJ 12/#171papers
in case anyone is interested, here's the study: https://t.co/G2aNZX11Lz
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/769FBDkkAk
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates: Cluster failure:… https://t.co/It9Le6w2Hs [fav]
@CathLoveday Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/eCLuxP2bBj
RT @fMRI_today: Regarding https://t.co/tvKP8khO2W, Tom Nichol’s clarification on how many studies may be actually be influenced. https://t.…
RT @fMRI_today: Regarding https://t.co/tvKP8khO2W, Tom Nichol’s clarification on how many studies may be actually be influenced. https://t.…
This could cast doubt on so much work that has relied on fMRI. https://t.co/NRcTmFMj98
Study shows MRIs have high false-positives because they incorrectly assume Gaussian-shaped spatial autocorrelations https://t.co/0KPBbp6jZw
Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates (up to 70%!) https://t.co/3JrMs8e8iE #fMRI #neuroscience #research
RT @FoSColumbia: How much do we really learn from fMRI studies? A new study in PNAS suggests a high rate of false positives. https://t.co/z…
How much do we really learn from fMRI studies? A new study in PNAS suggests a high rate of false positives. https://t.co/zo079QFgL7
RT @PidouxV: 'Our results question the validity of some 40,000 #fMRI studies' https://t.co/rlzLMFlQnj #neuroscience https://t.co/7hYDsnkq5C
Research News: Cluster failure: Why #fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. #PNAS: https://t.co/ZalAm9rGju
Whoops.... https://t.co/VxBTa9opyw
Wow !!! https://t.co/94g2KgbOEU
https://t.co/VkH1paCPpS Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates
RT @SimonGandevia: Neuroimaging: We need better analysis methods and why 40,000 fMRI studies may be wrong! https://t.co/m5gU4e0NXP
@juancarreno acá un artículo que muestra el enorme % de falsos positivos en estudios de fMRI https://t.co/HghoXHeZ78
@SamHarrisOrg thoughts? Bug in fMRI software calls 15 years of research into question https://t.co/asDCj5pSRO. https://t.co/sQL0Ifk9rW
@SamHarrisOrg thoughts? Bug in fMRI software calls 15 years of research into question https://t.co/Y3IkAh9cgo. https://t.co/EY11wkCSi6
RT @drRohanR: Amazing study re potential inaccuracy of fMRI https://t.co/ybBwVe3bib
RT @PidouxV: 'Our results question the validity of some 40,000 #fMRI studies' https://t.co/rlzLMFlQnj #neuroscience https://t.co/7hYDsnkq5C
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/esOuKLqqIR
Study finds bug in #fMRI software & it raises questions on some 40k pub #research papers. https://t.co/8RAYKvaYID #neuroscience #psychology
RT @SimonGandevia: Neuroimaging: We need better analysis methods and why 40,000 fMRI studies may be wrong! https://t.co/m5gU4e0NXP
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/mFiqzJcrCT
Analysis of control groups reveals that fMRI studies have much higher false positive rates than previously assumed: https://t.co/6klHwQBgU8
RT @fMRI_today: Regarding https://t.co/tvKP8khO2W, Tom Nichol’s clarification on how many studies may be actually be influenced. https://t.…
RT @fMRI_today: Regarding https://t.co/tvKP8khO2W, Tom Nichol’s clarification on how many studies may be actually be influenced. https://t.…
Amazing study re potential inaccuracy of fMRI https://t.co/ybBwVe3bib
In a software driven world, who is validating the software? https://t.co/8RAYKvaYID #autonomous #psychology #stat #quality #research #tech
Bug in #fMRI software may invalidate >40,000 research papers from the past 15-25 years https://t.co/cDucWL1Jxb #brain #research
@SoSimplehealth Good points. Yes beware fMRI: most studies may be wrong! https://t.co/m5gU4e0NXP
Meten is weten? Opvallende studie in PNAS over betrouwbaarheid fMRI methode: https://t.co/M4i9jJlDLu
MT @DrDavidLey: fMRI studies viewed as windows to the brain. But new research says they're extremely unreliable. https://t.co/1UvknELym7
Regarding https://t.co/FRQf7NBccr, how many papers would have their primary take home message changed? My guess is very few. Examples?
RT @SimonGandevia: Neuroimaging: We need better analysis methods and why 40,000 fMRI studies may be wrong! https://t.co/m5gU4e0NXP
RT @EricTopol: Challenging #brain scan dogma: @TheEconomist weighs in https://t.co/QCoeVKVjol re: https://t.co/IaYEfBTf4X @PNASNews https:/…
Comment on Eklund A (2016): Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive https://t.co/U0HpeZ7uAU
RT @zooko: Goddammit! Does this mean an entire generation of brain science wasted!? https://t.co/jv0hmOhC0Y https://t.co/Dr4HeRsxAN
Neuroimaging: We need better analysis methods and why 40,000 fMRI studies may be wrong! https://t.co/m5gU4e0NXP
.@ten_photos comment on fMRI "cluster failure" paper after PNAS rejected paper corrigendum https://t.co/1ioVMMe2VQ - important clarification
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @Anhaeuser: RT @HansZauner: "40.000 fMRI-Studien falsch"? Nein, so hatten die Autoren das nicht gemeint: https://t.co/kVGhWK8Nly
RT @HansZauner: "40.000 fMRI-Studien falsch"? Nein, so hatten die Autoren das nicht gemeint: https://t.co/kVGhWK8Nly
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @ykamit: 何も課題をしていない時の脳データに課題のラベルを適当に割り当てて標準的な解析ソフト(SPM他)で解析したら、FWE 5%の設定で、70%近い擬陽性がでることもあるという話。まあ、そうだろうと思ってたけど、ここまでひどいとは https://t.co/6X…
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @FWFOpenAccess: A software bug questions the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies ... open research data is needed | https://t.co/jm43H…
RT @EricTopol: Challenging #brain scan dogma: @TheEconomist weighs in https://t.co/QCoeVKVjol re: https://t.co/IaYEfBTf4X @PNASNews https:/…
Software bugs, fMRI, and science https://t.co/lHRi8yWPwk https://t.co/M3kGm3a7Uy
Why #fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated #FalsePositive rates: https://t.co/gF9D8d8h3l
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @ten_photos: .@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
.@MarcusMunafo Brilliant idea! Pubmed Commons comment now live: https://t.co/5mPfY1KRjJ
RT @BartS: If true... big issue for neuro science! Large parts of published fMRI studies probably invalid... #statistics https://t.co/ldH9F…
RT @EricTopol: Challenging #brain scan dogma: @TheEconomist weighs in https://t.co/QCoeVKVjol re: https://t.co/IaYEfBTf4X @PNASNews https:/…
RT @EricTopol: Challenging #brain scan dogma: @TheEconomist weighs in https://t.co/QCoeVKVjol re: https://t.co/IaYEfBTf4X @PNASNews https:/…
RT @EricTopol: Challenging #brain scan dogma: @TheEconomist weighs in https://t.co/QCoeVKVjol re: https://t.co/IaYEfBTf4X @PNASNews https:/…
Challenging #brain scan dogma: @TheEconomist weighs in https://t.co/QCoeVKVjol re: https://t.co/IaYEfBTf4X @PNASNews https://t.co/9Ejav0mLCW
Study finds bug in #fMRI software & it raises questions on some 40k pub #research papers. https://t.co/8RAYKvaYID #neuroscience #psychology
"Functional MRI (fMRI) is 25 years old, yet surprisingly its most common statistical methods have not been... https://t.co/dl9SoRbHBn
"This calls into question the validity of countless published fMRI studies based on parametric clusterwise inference"https://t.co/hC2adEOG6S
This could be quite a big deal: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/HE7PFhH3PU
If true... big issue for neuro science! Large parts of published fMRI studies probably invalid... #statistics https://t.co/ldH9Fj4TGH
RT @MotorImpairment: Neuroimaging: why 40,000 fMRI studies may be wrong! https://t.co/lf17yRbYBM Excellent new analysis
RT @MotorImpairment: Neuroimaging: why 40,000 fMRI studies may be wrong! https://t.co/lf17yRbYBM Excellent new analysis
Neuroimaging: why 40,000 fMRI studies may be wrong! https://t.co/lf17yRbYBM Excellent new analysis
RT @tera_sawa: Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/FHr2kD80ll
Wonder if this paper is going to cause a lot of cluster headaches? #statistics https://t.co/G9VQB53rhJ
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/d5IM4Leo9l
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates https://t.co/SrCNN744Ni
Software's for fMRI yield erroneous results: https://t.co/rQr8i7nFHb Image via xkcd https://t.co/RcUTd2YmMY
High degree of false positives (up to 70%) for fMRI analyses performed with most common software: https://t.co/0eKf0PH8BO
RT @FWFOpenAccess: A software bug questions the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies ... open research data is needed | https://t.co/jm43H…
RT @FWFOpenAccess: A software bug questions the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies ... open research data is needed | https://t.co/jm43H…
RT @dagmarfraser: "SPM, FSL, AFNI ... false-positive rates of up to 70%" https://t.co/ibrK2Sg1UD & https://t.co/gphM1NLLrI
RT @jb_morin: fMRI more & more popular in Sport Science, this new methodological paper may be of interest https://t.co/n1COCw905K https://t…
Is your #fMRI analysis technique flawed? from @PNASNews https://t.co/RLG9IgJztp
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates: https://t.co/RhW5O7X615
A potential problem of fMRI studies and their conclusions? https://t.co/AwPbg4dvyS