Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates User tarkay, in the NaturalWellness, Alternative and Holistic Medicine subreddit, 06 Sep 2016
The most commonly used softwares for fMRI analysis result in false-positive rates of up to 70%, which questions the validity of up to 40,000 papers. User Biermoese, in the Neuroscience: Your brain on reddit subreddit, 13 Jul 2016
The software for fMRI analysis results in false-positive rates of up to 70% instead of theoretically expected 5%. Which questions the validity of some 40,000 studies conducted over the last 20 years. User dimka_hse, in the Neuroscience: News and Discussions. subreddit, 06 Jul 2016
"[...] we found that the most common software packages for fMRI analysis (SPM, FSL, AFNI) can result in false-positive rates of up to 70%. These results question the validity of some 40,000 fMRI studies and may have a large impact on the interpretation of neuroimaging results." (/r/cogsci) User ContentForager, in the Misty Front Page subreddit, 06 Jul 2016
Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies? User meechosch, in the Everything Science subreddit, 17 Dec 2015
Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies? User meechosch, in the Neuroscience: Your brain on reddit subreddit, 17 Dec 2015
Can Parametric Statistical Methods be Trusted for fMRI Based Group Studies? User Noos-xH, in the Neuroscience: News and Discussions. subreddit, 06 Dec 2015