| Title |
Is CRISPR-based gene drive a biocontrol silver bullet or global conservation threat?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1514258112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce L. Webber, S. Raghu, Owain R. Edwards |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 22% |
| Australia | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 66% |
| Scientists | 19 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 401 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 86 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 12% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 13% |
| Unknown | 66 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 178 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 9% |
| Unknown | 80 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#246,697
of 24,037,774 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4,725
of 100,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,855
of 268,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#62
of 880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.