↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Exploitation drives an ontogenetic-like deepening in marine fish

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
161 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Exploitation drives an ontogenetic-like deepening in marine fish
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1802096115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth T. Frank, Brian Petrie, William C. Leggett, Daniel G. Boyce

Abstract

Virtually all studies reporting deepening with increasing size or age by fishes involve commercially harvested species. Studies of North Sea plaice in the early 1900s first documented this phenomenon (named Heincke's law); it occurred at a time of intensive harvesting and rapid technological changes in fishing methods. The possibility that this deepening might be the result of harvesting has never been evaluated. Instead, age- or size-related deepening have been credited to interactions between density-dependent food resources and density-independent environmental factors. Recently, time-dependent depth variations have been ascribed to ocean warming. We use a model, initialized from observations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) on the eastern Scotian Shelf, where an age-dependent deepening of ∼60 m was observed, to assess the effect of size- and depth-selective exploitation on fish distribution. Exploitation restricted to the upper 80 m can account for ∼72% of the observed deepening; by extending exploitation to 120 m, all of the deepening can be accounted for. In the absence of fishing, the model indicated no age-related deepening. Observations of depth distributions of older cod during a moratorium on fishing supported this prediction; however, younger cod exhibited low-amplitude deepening (10-15 m) suggestive of an ontogenetic response. The implications of these findings are manifold, particularly as they relate to hypotheses advanced to explain the ecological and evolutionary basis for ontogenetic deepening and to recent calls for the adoption of evidence of species deepening as a biotic indicator or "footprint" of warming seas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 38 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 38%
Environmental Science 21 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 46 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#338,646
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,116
of 103,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,384
of 343,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#120
of 971 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 971 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.