Comment on the “science is in crisis” narrative (from https://t.co/kno1OGP6q8) https://t.co/mnFWlR7Zk8
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @ComorbidCath: Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/rSu9ejZA99
RT @mnitabach: Of course it's not. Science is proceeding as it always has. Currently, there are factions flogging "reproducibility crisis"…
RT @mnitabach: Of course it's not. Science is proceeding as it always has. Currently, there are factions flogging "reproducibility crisis"…
RT @mnitabach: Of course it's not. Science is proceeding as it always has. Currently, there are factions flogging "reproducibility crisis"…
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/rSu9ejZA99
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @dirnagl: 'Efforts to improve the reproducibility and integrity of science are typically justified by a narrative of crisis[...]. This a…
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
RT @mnitabach: Of course it's not. Science is proceeding as it always has. Currently, there are factions flogging "reproducibility crisis"…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
Of course it's not. Science is proceeding as it always has. Currently, there are factions flogging "reproducibility crisis" to advance their own interests that have nothing to do w reproducibility. https://t.co/Z8WuwiERUF
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
The new “science is in crisis” narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproductive. Instead of inspiring younger generations to do more and better science, it might foster in them cynicism and indifference.🤔 https://t.
RT @dirnagl: 'Efforts to improve the reproducibility and integrity of science are typically justified by a narrative of crisis[...]. This a…
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/iVQjyh1UgD
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
RT @_lilacblue_: I love how the narrative arc of the ‘free speech crisis’ cleanly tracks that of the ‘replication crisis’ “There’s errors…
RT @lesloew: Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer…
Here's a thoughtful editorial asking: "Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?" Short answer: no. https://t.co/KjELzd4hSN See a number of articles on #Reproducibility in this issue of @PNASNews https://t.co/dK8IvpNUpp
RT @C_Hudson13: We're not in a replicability "crisis", but it's still time for an open science and replicability revolution!! Moving toward…
Here's a very good question: what is actually the evidence FOR an actual "crisis"? https://t.co/h6tsK6RWzE https://t.co/ey4Lq7wMb9
Fanelli claims replication crisis is confined to small regions, isn't growing, and isn't distorting majority of lit // https://t.co/QNx0ZKqyHw
To me, the only trouble is with the word 'crisis', which suggests that scientific methods at some point in the past were *better* than now. A brief perusal of journals from 1900 suggests otherwise....We can be better, but that's not the same as saying we
Another article on reproducibility crisis https://t.co/mrb65M7RW1
"The new “science is in crisis” narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproductive." #Replication #ReplicationCrisis #Reproducibility #OpenScience https://t.co/dQoVGMKrP1
RT @dirnagl: 'Efforts to improve the reproducibility and integrity of science are typically justified by a narrative of crisis[...]. This a…
RT @dirnagl: 'Efforts to improve the reproducibility and integrity of science are typically justified by a narrative of crisis[...]. This a…
RT @twitemp1: @bradpwyble @Abebab @IrisVanRooij @zerdeve @o_guest Relatedly, "The new “science is in crisis” ...Instead of inspiring younge…
RT @dirnagl: 'Efforts to improve the reproducibility and integrity of science are typically justified by a narrative of crisis[...]. This a…
'Efforts to improve the reproducibility and integrity of science are typically justified by a narrative of crisis[...]. This article provides an overview of recent evidence suggesting that this narrative is mistaken' PNAS chockful of relevant articles http
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
RT @recnac1: Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? The fact that we continue to discuss this,…
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
@bradpwyble @Abebab @IrisVanRooij @zerdeve @o_guest Relatedly, "The new “science is in crisis” ...Instead of inspiring younger generations to do more and better science, it might foster in them cynicism and indifference. " https://t.co/3ZLPKqw4I0
RT @_lilacblue_: I love how the narrative arc of the ‘free speech crisis’ cleanly tracks that of the ‘replication crisis’ “There’s errors…
I love how the narrative arc of the ‘free speech crisis’ cleanly tracks that of the ‘replication crisis’ “There’s errors that need to be corrected but let’s not call it a crisis because that’s bad advertising for our in-group” https://t.co/LtMqfrDJRr
RT @riet911: @kohske 3/12のPNASの中で再現可能性に関係ありそうなんはこの辺ですかね。プチ特集でしょうか、タイムリーですね、さすが池田ラジオw https://t.co/PUoIhvO7qK https://t.co/s8S81uDPfB https:…
I've been saying this so long. There is no freaking crisis. There are always some buffoons in every endeavor.... https://t.co/vrumdiEN31
"The new “science is in crisis” narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproductive." https://t.co/kMdAWUTxFy
RT @lichtenmj: Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/TJGL6Wn4qv
Reproducibility problem? Actually, no problem! https://t.co/yW9YqxlNEK
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/TJGL6Wn4qv
RT @EnriqueFatas: “Science always was and always will be a struggle to produce knowledge ... against the cognitive and moral limitations of individual human beings, including the limitations of scientists themselves”. Agreed. https://t.co/OcetiIVqNB
Interestingly, I disagree with much of the framing of this, but it ends up on a fine note https://t.co/3RH3gVKihF via @PNASNews https://t.co/rx3ehksOdi
“Science always was and always will be a struggle to produce knowledge ... against the cognitive and moral limitations of individual human beings, including the limitations of scientists themselves”. Agreed. https://t.co/UzwzTuNtsn
How common are fabricated, false, & irreproducible findings ? https://t.co/TCTgwoeTbw https://t.co/lh3pBxid5M
Indeed...and we should also ask whether aiming for 100% reproducibility is good for science. "Crisis" is usually a marketing narrative. https://t.co/lBnTIlhYVe
RT @RetractionWatch: "The new 'science is in crisis' narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproduct…
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
再現可能性問題、危機的状況にあると言われている。たしかに色々と問題はあるが、科学全体を脅かすものではない。Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/WlfF88yST7
Interesting take on the "reproducibility crisis narrative" - maybe a hint of the narrative itself changing?! https://t.co/znywzQJbEV
@PNASNews is doing a major disservice by downplaying major problems with reproducibility in science and pseudoscience. https://t.co/cJFx4Om5lT
The question is if the crisis of science will replicate. https://t.co/rythSV1spv
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/94IfD8QDbW
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? The fact that we continue to discuss this, speaks volumes! https://t.co/uJ6FbhahZm #SWOGOnc #JAMAOnc
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
@kohske 3/12のPNASの中で再現可能性に関係ありそうなんはこの辺ですかね。プチ特集でしょうか、タイムリーですね、さすが池田ラジオw https://t.co/PUoIhvO7qK https://t.co/s8S81uDPfB https://t.co/zV0Cb3fJ4o https://t.co/oahblkpVI2 https://t.co/lvKPD125wb
Interesting take on reconsidering the “science in crisis” narrative with regards to reproducibility and quality of science - - https://t.co/BLqebl0lN9
RT @profgeraintrees: Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/mXbUgMmv5f
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
RT @statsepi: I woke up and still can't believe PNAS is gaslighting people about reproducibility. https://t.co/ry4nxjUyBS https://t.co/8HG…
RT @profgeraintrees: Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/mXbUgMmv5f
RT @profgeraintrees: Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/mXbUgMmv5f
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
Regardless of your opinion on this piece, you must admit that this is funny: "This finding was consistent with evidence that studies on publication bias may themselves be subject to a publication bias " #ScienceInCrisis #PublicationBias#pHacking #Science
RT @RetractionWatch: "The new 'science is in crisis' narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproduct…
RT @learnfromerror: A paper by Fanelli: blithely uses power to compute false positive probs in a quasi-Bayesian diagnostic screening model…
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/mXbUgMmv5f
"Nothing Important Happened Today" The new narrative of the "Don't Disturb the Dead" https://t.co/70heKjGzar
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
RT @RetractionWatch: "The new 'science is in crisis' narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproduct…
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
RT @lakens: Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https:…
Do you know what the difference is between a published opinion piece in PNAS and a guest post on a blog? Neither do I. https://t.co/zD5n7VslIw
RT @RemiGau: Fanelli makes interesting points on the reproducibility crisis that might surprise you especially if you believe it is a homog…
RT @learnfromerror: A paper by Fanelli: blithely uses power to compute false positive probs in a quasi-Bayesian diagnostic screening model…
Fanelli makes interesting points on the reproducibility crisis that might surprise you especially if you believe it is a homogeneous and growing phenomenon with a systematic negative impact on the whole of science... But how many people actually believe th
I woke up and still can't believe PNAS is gaslighting people about reproducibility. https://t.co/ry4nxjUyBS https://t.co/8HGDoozns1
A paper by Fanelli: blithely uses power to compute false positive probs in a quasi-Bayesian diagnostic screening model https://t.co/Q9fwZmGpcS https://t.co/YhgInh014O
RT @GeorgeShiber: Excellent: 'The new "science is in crisis" narrative is not only empirically unsupported, it's also not new: such narrat…
RT @GeorgeShiber: Excellent: 'The new "science is in crisis" narrative is not only empirically unsupported, it's also not new: such narrat…
RT @GeorgeShiber: Excellent: 'The new "science is in crisis" narrative is not only empirically unsupported, it's also not new: such narrat…
RT @GeorgeShiber: Excellent: 'The new "science is in crisis" narrative is not only empirically unsupported, it's also not new: such narrat…
RT @GeorgeShiber: Excellent: 'The new "science is in crisis" narrative is not only empirically unsupported, it's also not new: such narrat…