"...do your homework..." Like that swill you sent me from Scholeroo? Only minutes after lecturing us on the criticallity of correcting for confounding factors, you forward a magazine piece publishing nothing but confounding factors, advertising them as o
@HuppenthalJohn The "Reproducibility Crisis" is generally in social science and medicine, & has nothing to do with climate science or physics. At least pretend to do your homework before you give your book report. I recall a coed in my 7th grade learn
RT @achenfinance: The Ariely / Gino scandal is a spectacular anecdote but the available data find scientific fraud is rare (https://t.co/uE…
RT @achenfinance: The Ariely / Gino scandal is a spectacular anecdote but the available data find scientific fraud is rare (https://t.co/uE…
RT @achenfinance: The Ariely / Gino scandal is a spectacular anecdote but the available data find scientific fraud is rare (https://t.co/uE…
RT @achenfinance: The Ariely / Gino scandal is a spectacular anecdote but the available data find scientific fraud is rare (https://t.co/uE…
RT @achenfinance: The Ariely / Gino scandal is a spectacular anecdote but the available data find scientific fraud is rare (https://t.co/uE…
The Ariely / Gino scandal is a spectacular anecdote but the available data find scientific fraud is rare (https://t.co/uEI5oitskk). On the other hand, it begs the question: are famous scholars more prone to errors because of the power they hold? 🧵
@ianhussey A good start is the "replicability crisis narrative", peddled despite lots of evidence against it. https://t.co/Yj492XDOWH Please feel free to show me where is my error or the evidence that I am missing. You'd be the first.
@cremieuxrecueil Thanks! Your blog post is an impressive summary. Though I would be careful in interpreting these distributions too boldly. There are lots of hidden assumptions (e.g. independence), and P-hacking might be a lesser concern for science than o
Reproducible experiments, after all, being only one form of empiricism. Even within that realm, the sciences may be having a crisis of reproducibility (depending on how you talk to). https://t.co/XcXVKEaOt1
@Arthur_Revolver @SimpNeelix @VengefulBillW @ADL @Cloudflare Your article's point is reproducibility may be lacking in part because of complexity of experiments and nuanced expertise(and potentially equipment/lab). Consider this counterpoint: https://t.c
@dysmemic @simon_sat @JamesMelville @MellilianFlyer The replication crisis has been debunked more times then one. https://t.co/YZsCAYl0dm https://t.co/bTJowOi0LA
@DFanDaBiasedMan published a counterview a year later in PNAS @PNASNews, but interestingly enough, the implication of his view still supports the #DeSci movement! @JocelynnPearl podcast? https://t.co/1PaQ0cPSFB
RT @cshperspectives: @JohnBorghi @drugmonkeyblog Meanwhile since everyone always cites that Ioannidis paper (though less so recently for so…
RT @cshperspectives: @JohnBorghi @drugmonkeyblog Meanwhile since everyone always cites that Ioannidis paper (though less so recently for so…
@JohnBorghi @drugmonkeyblog Meanwhile since everyone always cites that Ioannidis paper (though less so recently for some reason 😂) without actually reading it, it’s worth looking at what his former post-doc had to say 2/2 https://t.co/GSApO5R6qx 2/2
RT @FinRepro: Door 14 of the #AdventOfRepro calendar
Door 14 of the #AdventOfRepro calendar
RT @FinRepro: 1️⃣4️⃣🎄🎁 #AdventOfRepro Today’s calendar door hides some optimism by @DFanDaBiasedMan “The science is in crisis narrative…
Yet another article starting with a question "Is there a reproducibility crisis in science?" Open door 14 of #AdventOfRepro from @FinRepro
1️⃣4️⃣🎄🎁 #AdventOfRepro Today’s calendar door hides some optimism by @DFanDaBiasedMan “The science is in crisis narrative […] Instead of inspiring younger generations to do more and better science, it might foster in them cynicism and indifference” ht
RT @achenfinance: @camharvey @CliffordAsness How have other fields recalibrated? My sense of the follow-ups to Ioannides (2005) is they fi…
@camharvey @CliffordAsness How have other fields recalibrated? My sense of the follow-ups to Ioannides (2005) is they find the crisis narrative is overstated. This excerpt 👇 sounds an awful lot like where we're going in finance. https://t.co/fTZEqofDJV ht
@vicbakker @markvanasten @MarcVegt Tsja, evengoed is het een geregisseerde hit job, als je ziet hoe de eerste zin al begint. Ik lees liever geen kranten en neem de academische papierproductiesector ook niet al te serieus. https://t.co/mQEy5UrCDO https://t.
RT @brembs: “pressure to publish was most strongly correlated with questionable research behavior” https://t.co/uKcVSuZrhv Seems to be in l…
RT @brembs: “pressure to publish was most strongly correlated with questionable research behavior” https://t.co/uKcVSuZrhv Seems to be in l…
@JokerActual @ShepsonMcgee @El_Crypto_Chapo Not an issue... https://t.co/R0LVplCaeA
Paper discussed Opinion piece - Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/tU13NF3APo - author argues no. Have to find time to follow some of the references...
@BadaBingoz Ohja, zijn 'p-waarde' en 'reproductiviteitscrisis' is een vrij standaard onderwerp, kun je bv gewoon hier vinden: https://t.co/ANhGjix6Rz
@michael_nielsen Platt's 'Strong inference'. https://t.co/LRJabKOMJl Chamberlin's 'Multiple working hypotheses'. https://t.co/pG6ycCGKGW Fanelli https://t.co/zm2MKDVp1e. Ulrich & Miller on questionable research practices https://t.co/72xgBJWDCf. https:
@polemicarc @ocschwar @oilngas007 @GretaThunberg “Overwhelming”? Rubbish. https://t.co/AgcJZBZZdg Secondly, as imperfect as it is, there is no better source of knowledge unless you are religious. So again you have no point.
Is #science facing a #reproducibility crisis? What do you think? https://t.co/GYV6o7Sqrh
Need some #MondayMotivation from the Dept of #Methodology? How about Dr Daniele Fanelli arguing for the empowerment of scientists? Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Read the article here: https://t.co/6fZTT7ikjW http
RT @schneiderleonid: And as a privileged white male, I feel @nasorg are my natural allies. https://t.co/6Uo8t9tt9B
RT @DFanDaBiasedMan: In response to the concerns expressed about my participation to the forthcoming NAS (National Academy of Scholars) con…
Opinion piece by Daniele Fanelli from @MethodologyLSE looks at whether science is really facing a reproducibility crisis. https://t.co/NvwkFUdQRR https://t.co/wSBQuFjfLy
@Teeniebeanster @bikinatroll @FullyClump Really? https://t.co/gV4hgk96wl https://t.co/AMQieDePbn So could not be true. https://t.co/GZDoApMFvY
RT @LinkopingTea: Does science need a "reproducibility crisis" narrative? Join us for a discussion of this question at our first #Reproduci…
Does science need a "reproducibility crisis" narrative? Join us for a discussion of this question at our first #ReproducibiliTea journal club meeting of this year, today at 11:15–12:00 in I:207 (I building, campus Valla). https://t.co/Y89s5Jd1oa
RT @DFanDaBiasedMan: In response to the concerns expressed about my participation to the forthcoming NAS (National Academy of Scholars) con…
In response to the concerns expressed about my participation to the forthcoming NAS (National Academy of Scholars) conference: please note that I am an avowed critic of the idea that science is in crisis (https://t.co/b4N9QYrg3Y) and that it needs "fixing"
Cambiando de tema, a cuento de la supuesta crisis de reproducibilidad científica que tanto se está comentando en los medios. No estoy para nada de acuerdo, y coincido con el autor de este trabajo:... https://t.co/zgKRPSrwSt
@IonSource @FasciottiMaira @francesarnold It varies with discipline. This paper https://t.co/eXRY4dVOyp estimated less than 50% of papers in the psychological sciences were reproducible. A Nature survey highlighted major concerns - see https://t.co/UstdGlv
@Thomas_Auriel @stdebove Il faut aussi clairement quantifier. La manière dont c'est présenté donne souvent à penser que 90% de la science est pourrie alors que c'est beaucoup moins. Et certains champs de recherche comme les études cliniques sont grandement
@juliafstrand Not that I agree with it but maybe this one? https://t.co/DRdRUC1lln
The new “science is in crisis” narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproductive. Instead of inspiring younger generations to do more and better science, it might foster in them cynicism and indifference. https://t.
@Heretic_City @Renevelation @Ah_Science Have you ever heard of the admonition to not confuse correlation with causation? https://t.co/cFaAuXBOaf
@Heretic_City @Renevelation @Ah_Science On Twitter atheists, cherry-picking, and always getting it wrong. https://t.co/cFaAuXBOaf
Interesting ‘rebuttal’ which as far as I can tell doesn’t actually dispute what it’s rebutting lol https://t.co/M98QCLLPeb
@Lonebeatle @religulous @Ah_Science @APoulikakos Aside from the very small and homogeneous sample & from the authors' confusion between correlation and causation https://t.co/ehD49q5WSF we need reproducibility of the study https://t.co/w0wNlVT4JQ https
RT @Protohedgehog: Do we need a revised taxonomy and understanding of replication and reproducibility? Note to self: read more of Daniele F…
Do we need a revised taxonomy and understanding of replication and reproducibility? Note to self: read more of Daniele Fanelli'S work! (eg https://t.co/CGuUu74rMc) https://t.co/Bfi6EnVWNx
Scientific papers are getting longer, more complex, and richer in data. We have better detection & analysis of p-hacking & questionable research practices, but no evidence that they are getting worse. But there is strong narrative of reproducibilit
This may be of interest to some of us!
This week's Evelyn Pielou Discussion Group will attempt to determine whether ecology/evolution is actually facing a reproducibility crisis or whether we are doing just fine. Suggested Reading: https://t.co/YhiU2nMWlH & https://t.co/Cc9cuixkDr 📅Wed.
#NOW2019 Crisis versus crisis narrative [readings] Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/98c4zaOW70
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? => "The new “science is in crisis” narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproductive" https://t.co/4oqi5P7mxK
Interesting read @Emily_Flies https://t.co/wOMrc6wZXG
RT @genologos: Scientists and journalists: Don't uncritically repeat the narrative that “science” is facing a reproduciblity “crisis”: htt…
RT @genologos: Scientists and journalists: Don't uncritically repeat the narrative that “science” is facing a reproduciblity “crisis”: htt…
RT @genologos: Scientists and journalists: Don't uncritically repeat the narrative that “science” is facing a reproduciblity “crisis”: htt…
RT @mnitabach: Several distinct agendas drive bogus hysteria over "reproducibility crisis" & have created dangerous alliances between some…
RT @mnitabach: Several distinct agendas drive bogus hysteria over "reproducibility crisis" & have created dangerous alliances between some…
RT @genologos: Scientists and journalists: Don't uncritically repeat the narrative that “science” is facing a reproduciblity “crisis”: htt…
RT @mnitabach: Several distinct agendas drive bogus hysteria over "reproducibility crisis" & have created dangerous alliances between some…
RT @genologos: Scientists and journalists: Don't uncritically repeat the narrative that “science” is facing a reproduciblity “crisis”: htt…
RT @mnitabach: Several distinct agendas drive bogus hysteria over "reproducibility crisis" & have created dangerous alliances between some…
RT @mnitabach: Several distinct agendas drive bogus hysteria over "reproducibility crisis" & have created dangerous alliances between some…
Several distinct agendas drive bogus hysteria over "reproducibility crisis" & have created dangerous alliances between some scientists & non-scientists. https://t.co/ASrh4fgVHN
RT @genologos: Scientists and journalists: Don't uncritically repeat the narrative that “science” is facing a reproduciblity “crisis”: htt…
RT @genologos: Scientists and journalists: Don't uncritically repeat the narrative that “science” is facing a reproduciblity “crisis”: htt…
Scientists and journalists: Don't uncritically repeat the narrative that “science” is facing a reproduciblity “crisis”: https://t.co/AFyd0ppnnS
"The new “science is in crisis” narrative is not only empirically unsupported, but also quite obviously counterproductive. Instead of inspiring younger generations to do more and better science, it might foster in them cynicism and indifference." https://t
RT @mrgunn: You may have opinions about the extent, distribution, trends, or causes of irreproducible research. Fanelli's new paper brings…
You may have opinions about the extent, distribution, trends, or causes of irreproducible research. Fanelli's new paper brings the data & will challenge your assumptions: https://t.co/4xfyerhTF9 (good reading for #SSP2018 & #openscience)
RT @C0PE: Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/EpY8dSSVQ9
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? https://t.co/EpY8dSSVQ9
@grodaeu Take it easy on old Noah. The so called "empirical" economists such as he considers himself had a bad week https://t.co/4aqUqBB1SU
Fake Science with a special shout out to you, "empirical" economists. https://t.co/evaqMr6edD
The original commentary by @philipbstark is at https://t.co/meCfgYJv9O . Mentioned also in https://t.co/E1Bspukgcd where a very rich set of other "ingredients" may help to depict a volcanic atmosphere in science. See also https://t.co/JQFFE1372v @Retracti
RT @dannykay68: ALTERATIVE VIEW: “Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?” March 12, 2018 published in PNA…
ALTERATIVE VIEW: “Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?” March 12, 2018 published in PNAS. https://t.co/bhdVy3lOTr #dsip2018
RT @phylogenomics: Daniele Fanelli: Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? News story: https://…
RT @markauskaite: Do We Need the “Science in Crisis” Narrative to Promote Better Science? https://t.co/LWECl1dRWz
RT @SFuntowicz: Forceful comment by @AndreaSaltelli arguing that the crisis in science “is real, systemic, methodological, and epistemic,…
Do We Need the “Science in Crisis” Narrative to Promote Better Science? https://t.co/LWECl1dRWz
RT @SFuntowicz: Forceful comment by @AndreaSaltelli arguing that the crisis in science “is real, systemic, methodological, and epistemic,…
RT @INRMMnews: Crisis of science: multiple perspectives, including the perceived role of irreproducibility and science ethics https://t.co/…
RT @INRMMnews: Crisis of science: multiple perspectives, including the perceived role of irreproducibility and science ethics https://t.co/…