@KatherineClark We are honored that our work showing that @NIH contributed funding for basic #research leading to every new drug contributes #policies to improve #publichealth. @sciindustry @BentleyU https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l
@AOC We are honored that our work showing that @NIH contributed funding for basic #research leading to every new drug contributes #policies to improve #publichealth. @sciindustry @BentleyU https://t.co/0NGoFy32zo
RT @katy_milani: This line of questioning around the role of government in pharma was KEY! Gov't sets the rules. Gov't creates the market…
This line of questioning around the role of government in pharma was KEY! Gov't sets the rules. Gov't creates the market. Gov't gives firms the legal authority to exist and sell drugs. Gov't funds innovation and R&D (25 to 30% of all R&D) https
@SenStabenow just brought up my favorite study, which I'm linking again in her honor. NIH funding contributed to every drug approved 2010-2016. "We ought to be able to afford the medicine" after gov. helps fund it. https://t.co/xzAvhuRgm3
RT @MattCameronLane: Reminder when you are listening to CEOs talk of "innovation" at today's @SenFinance @SenateFinance hearing: a study fo…
Reminder when you are listening to CEOs talk of "innovation" at today's @SenFinance @SenateFinance hearing: a study found every one of the 210 drugs approved 2010-2016 came in part from government (NIH) funding. https://t.co/xzAvhuRgm3
RT @aronro: @Boris_Badenoff @airplane42 @molratty A large fraction of the fundamental research (with an emphasis on that 'f-word') in the l…
@oraeekene @EmekaOkoye @emeka_okafor @uwagbale_ @Onyi_Estelle @TheWomanWrapper @julietkego @asemota @DrJoeAbah @MoSibyl @Chxta @NIPRD1 @Fmohnigeria DIY research will only take is so far. All new drugs in U.S can trace some of its origin to NIH funding. Thi
@Boris_Badenoff @airplane42 @molratty A large fraction of the fundamental research (with an emphasis on that 'f-word') in the life sciences and biomedicine is government funded. And what it achieves is merely making possible most of the applied R&D - o
@LynnR3dh3ad @bjcreigh We agree with this interpretation of our work. 95% of the $100B in @NIH funding was "basic research" on drug targets, not drugs. @NIH funding enables industry #research, #discovery, #development. @sciindustry https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l
@HenkJanOut @LucienHordijk @willems_sonja Eerst zeg je dat ik 100 jaar niet opgelet heb en vervolgens is een referentie van negen jaar geleden niet goed genoeg. En ik heb niet "grotendeels" gezegd, beter lezen. Wat de "mythe" van publieke financiering betr
@bjcreigh This is a gross oversimplification . NIH research *contributed* to published research *associated* with the drugs. I've worked in clinical research for 25 years, and the money used to develop a drug, get it approved and marketed is private. http
@emilyakopp @RoKhanna Developing new #medicines for patients is hard; requires synergy between basic & applied #science https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l, #policy, #business, and #finance. Public policy can create common incentives, success @sciindustry @bentley
RT @emilyakopp: At today’s Oversight hearing on drug prices @RoKhanna just referenced this study showing NIH funding contributed to all 2…
RT @dawso007: This topic is heating up again - this study shows the bulk of taxpayer spending is focused on the basic science for drug deve…
RT @Russell02054325: @RCScience @AOC @Dereklowe https://t.co/BGi6VBhVMY this government article says otherwise and you completely gloss ove…
RT @TallestActivist: Tax payer money (through NIH) has in-part funded research behind every drug approved between 2010–2016 according to ht…
@Schnozberry So he can go after her all he wants, but he should really be going after the people testifying? Also that dude cited himself like four times in that piece. There are differing opinions on the matter — i dont think it’s a matter of scientific d
Tax payer money (through NIH) has in-part funded research behind every drug approved between 2010–2016 according to https://t.co/nGsQdMXR94. The freedom with which tax payer-funded breakthroughs are licensed to #BigPharma must be reformed. @AOC, please kee
@AOC Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. https://t.co/ovkiLgpLBO
Breathtaking: https://t.co/VunJhnFb3a
@AOC From the abstract to the study cited by Rep. Khanna: "The analysis shows that >90% of this funding represents basic research related to the biological targets for drug action rather than the drugs themselves." https://t.co/WWurMwWlP6 #Misleading
@AOC re: Taxpayers fund early research, then privatized to gouge same taxpayers. NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. https://t.co/QlD34JlO
@AOC Taxpayers fund early research, then privatized to gouge same taxpayers. NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. https://t.co/QlD34JlOaI
This topic is heating up again - this study shows the bulk of taxpayer spending is focused on the basic science for drug development rather than the drug itself. Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/NjRu8HhxV7
@SSWorks @AOC https://t.co/IFPHu3EXiN Please see this study about the "basic research" that we pay for, so make advil a dollar thanks
According to a 2018 study, taxpayers invested $100B between 2010-2016 alone. That's equivalent to a 10% stake in Big Pharma as a whole. Further, “…each of the 210 medicines approved for market came out of research supported by the NIH.” https://t.co/v5N8
@scragsma70 @anonsubstvnce @CalebJHull @GovernorVA @GOP No, it's not. https://t.co/oddwdQcq6G
RT @emilyakopp: At today’s Oversight hearing on drug prices @RoKhanna just referenced this study showing NIH funding contributed to all 2…
At today’s Oversight hearing on drug prices @RoKhanna just referenced this study showing NIH funding contributed to all 210 of the drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016 https://t.co/n9SiSvhBZn
RT @DataNinjaKat: Sanders proposes ‘fair pricing’ requirement for drugs created with taxpayer dollars. Actually, all drugs approved since 2…
RT @markjarthur: The @NIH has funded over $100B for new drug developmental and contributed to EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 210 FDA approved dr…
RT @markjarthur: The @NIH has funded over $100B for new drug developmental and contributed to EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 210 FDA approved dr…
RT @markjarthur: The @NIH has funded over $100B for new drug developmental and contributed to EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 210 FDA approved dr…
RT @markjarthur: The @NIH has funded over $100B for new drug developmental and contributed to EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 210 FDA approved dr…
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/y7n1FJWdPT
@EthanLinsanity @FrankPallone Ethan, the answer to your question is yes. As this study shows, EVERY SINGLE DRUG approved by FDA btw 2010-2016 (210 drugs) had federal dollars involved the foundational creation/research (NIH, public universities, gov't grant
Sanders proposes ‘fair pricing’ requirement for drugs created with taxpayer dollars. Actually, all drugs approved since 2010 received funding from taxpayer dollars! https://t.co/OHObSdCXe4 https://t.co/MhUHK0Ne41 via @statnews
@PhRMA https://t.co/du8d1W82fY So does NIH funding
@RoKhanna While @NIH funded research was behind every new drug approved form 2010-2016, >90% of this funding was for basic research on drug targets, not drugs themselves. https://t.co/3gSsEkFxeG
@Texas4ever2 @thebradfordfile You are disregarding the fact that the US government is the the biggest funder of global health research and development. Your taxdollars contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approv
RT @RoKhanna: Our tax dollars funded the groundbreaking innovation of all the 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016. This is why it…
RT @RoKhanna: Our tax dollars funded the groundbreaking innovation of all the 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016. This is why it…
RT @RoKhanna: Our tax dollars funded the groundbreaking innovation of all the 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016. This is why it…
RT @RoKhanna: Our tax dollars funded the groundbreaking innovation of all the 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016. This is why it…
RT @RoKhanna: Our tax dollars funded the groundbreaking innovation of all the 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016. This is why it…
RT @RoKhanna: Our tax dollars funded the groundbreaking innovation of all the 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016. This is why it…
Our tax dollars funded the groundbreaking innovation of all the 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016. This is why it is ABSURD for PHARMA to make obscene profits and we need to demand they sell their drugs at a fair price. https://t.co/BBJpkz9iEp
I used to be a neuropharmacologist. In drug development: private sector shmivate sector. NIH funding gets virtually everything rolling. One reason I left was because the NIH budget was in the toilet and I didn't want to fight with people smarter than me ov
@Quick3Bobby @NYCMayor We pay for the research, not big pharma https://t.co/GBeDnJLSCo
RT @brotherbeat: @sstephanz @JohnFis87569576 @Noratoriou5 @ActifyPress @sarcasm_liberty Tell me more about that https://t.co/exEiXYHUFf htt…
@sstephanz @JohnFis87569576 @Noratoriou5 @ActifyPress @sarcasm_liberty Tell me more about that https://t.co/exEiXYHUFf https://t.co/a7jd91ML7E
RT @SciIndustry: Funding @NIH contributed to #research behind all 59 #cancer drugs approved 2010-2016. This funding totaled >$75 billion, l…
Funding @NIH contributed to #research behind all 59 #cancer drugs approved 2010-2016. This funding totaled >$75 billion, leading to >250,000 publications on the drug target and >8,000 on the drugs themselves. Data from: https://t.co/7kcAIONYvh @pn
RT @markjarthur: @YoSoyLePluG @eTweeetz @jim_herd @YusufThinks @WhoWasNea @TorriNichelle Not nearly as much as they'd like you to believe t…
@YoSoyLePluG @eTweeetz @jim_herd @YusufThinks @WhoWasNea @TorriNichelle Not nearly as much as they'd like you to believe though. Pharma claims high drug prices are to "recoup research costs". Yet the @NIH contributed to every single one of the 210 drugs
@LabourCL https://t.co/7OH5gA8a2z "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016" https://t.co/FvBDmsbFBz facts, bitch.
@Katepa2018 They certainly fund R&D. But it's a smaller percentage of their budget than marketing. And per this article over > $100B and all 210 FDA approved drugs in an10 yet span were tied back to NIH funded (tax funded) research. https://t.c
@Katepa2018 Yeah it's a pretty tone deaf statement to make even if he believes it and it's in the linked article. Regarding Pharma NIH funded R&D: https://t.co/f1kCngnCEc
@ForumHSPH @HarvardChanSPH We agree with @akesselheim @PORTAL_research that @NIH funding for basic research plays a critical role in drug discovery and should be part of the #drugprices equation. Our work shows >90% of this funding was for basic resea
Today's @ForumHSPH at @HarvardChanSPH on #drugprices referenced our work @PNAS on the contribution of @NIH funding to new drug approvals. #forumhsph https://t.co/3G115z9QnZ
@schaabdl @FrankLuntz "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/XZ4TDtws2i
@GaryJFooks Our data showed that >90% of the research funded by the @NIH focused on the drug target, and did not mention the drug. The translational system involves both the public and private sectors. The system needs continuous improvement.https://t.c
Read the research behind this work: Cleary et al. "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals (2010-2016)" Proc Nat Acad Sci @PNAS @PNASNews https://t.co/otD51cJD39 @bentleyU @sciindustry @academicminute @nih
RT @SciIndustry: @HealthTLN @futurescibiz @bentleyu @AcademicMinute Read the research behind this work: Cleary et al. "Contribution of NIH…
@BentleyU_MG From the Departments of Natural & Applied Sciences and Management @BentleyU. Based on research @PNASnews: Cleary et al. "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals (2010-2016)" Proc Nat Acad Sci https://t.co/7kcAIONYvh @sciindustry
@AcademicMinute @bentleyu @WAMCRadio Read the research behind this work: Cleary et al. "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals (2010-2016)" Proc Nat Acad Sci @PNASNews https://t.co/7kcAIONYvh … @bentleyU @sciindustry @academicminute @nih
@AcademicMinute @bentleyu Read the research behind this work: Cleary et al. "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals (2010-2016)" Proc Nat Acad Sci @PNASNews https://t.co/7kcAIONYvh … @bentleyU @sciindustry @academicminute @nih
@HealthTLN @futurescibiz @bentleyu @AcademicMinute Read the research behind this work: Cleary et al. "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals (2010-2016)" Proc Nat Acad Sci @PNASNews https://t.co/7kcAIONYvh … @bentleyU @sciindustry @academicminu
Read the research behind this work: Cleary et al. "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals (2010-2016)" Proc Nat Acad Sci @PNASNews https://t.co/7kcAIONYvh @bentleyU @sciindustry @academicminute @nih
Interesting. How then can big pharma justify big costs for new meds if government takes most of the development risks....?
RT @GaryJFooks: Of the 210 medicines approved for market by the FDA between 2010 and 2016, every one originated in research conducted in go…
RT @GaryJFooks: Of the 210 medicines approved for market by the FDA between 2010 and 2016, every one originated in research conducted in go…
RT @GaryJFooks: Of the 210 medicines approved for market by the FDA between 2010 and 2016, every one originated in research conducted in go…
RT @GaryJFooks: Of the 210 medicines approved for market by the FDA between 2010 and 2016, every one originated in research conducted in go…
RT @GaryJFooks: Of the 210 medicines approved for market by the FDA between 2010 and 2016, every one originated in research conducted in go…
RT @GaryJFooks: Of the 210 medicines approved for market by the FDA between 2010 and 2016, every one originated in research conducted in go…
RT @GaryJFooks: Of the 210 medicines approved for market by the FDA between 2010 and 2016, every one originated in research conducted in go…
Of the 210 medicines approved for market by the FDA between 2010 and 2016, every one originated in research conducted in government laboratories or in university labs funded in large part by the National Institutes of Health https://t.co/5PGE2c9cto
RT @Egormad: Помогаю подруге (Кате Галкиной) пропиариться :) Научную статью запилила о том как гос финансирование (США) помогло изобретению…
Помогаю подруге (Кате Галкиной) пропиариться :) Научную статью запилила о том как гос финансирование (США) помогло изобретению новых лекарств. Отличным специалистом будет! https://t.co/PbS5Ctn1Aq
RT @MaryOCMack: https://t.co/GHZz140kRf @P4ADNOW @DavidP4AD
https://t.co/GHZz140kRf @P4ADNOW @DavidP4AD
@skathire @VertexPharma @Regeneron @Amgen ...the scope of #research required before enough is known about a target for successful drug development evident in average of $800M in @NIH funding for basic research leading to first-in-class drugs https://t.co/I
Translation: And a major question is also the extent to which financial support to research by society should impact drug prices? In a way, we pay for drugs twice: first by supporting their development and then eventually by paying high prices for them. ht
RT @lasleh: Ja iso kysymys on myös, miten yhteiskunnan tutkimuksiin antaman tuen pitäisi vaikuttaa lääkkeiden hintaan? Tavallaan maksamme l…
RT @lasleh: Ja iso kysymys on myös, miten yhteiskunnan tutkimuksiin antaman tuen pitäisi vaikuttaa lääkkeiden hintaan? Tavallaan maksamme l…
Ja iso kysymys on myös, miten yhteiskunnan tutkimuksiin antaman tuen pitäisi vaikuttaa lääkkeiden hintaan? Tavallaan maksamme lääkkeet kahteen kertaan, kun ensin tuemme kehitystä, mutta maksamme lopulta korkeita hintoja. Ks. https://t.co/AnI0yEU6l6
RT @DavidBobbitt: Great progress to see @NIH funded research leading to so many new drug approvals. @FDA requires @CDISC standards for all…
Of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016, every one benefited from @NIH funding. Of the 84 first-in-class drugs, NIH played a critical role to uncover new drug targets, enabling industry to more effectively develop novel drugs. #nihfunded ht
@StanfordBrian @neontaster here is a pharma-funded think tank agreeing with me https://t.co/vgjym49Ebg
@kenjaques @dkegel You're right again Ken! As an example, the tax funded @NIH contributed >$100B (20% of total budget) to all of the 210 newly FDA approved drugs between 2010-16. So Pharma is getting government money for R&D on revenue generatin
RT @xileenie: You may want to read, "The Truth AboutThe Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us And What To Do About It". by Dr. Marcia Angell…
RT @heatinformatics: NIH funding was directly or indirectly associated with every one of the 210 new drugs (NMEs) approved by the FDA from…
RT @markjarthur: #Pharma claims high drug prices are to "recoup research costs". Yet the @NIH contributed to every single one of the 210 d…