@dlacalle_IA True, something most politicians do not understand. However, there are big beneficiaries of gov't redistribution of taxpayer $ and small ones. E.g. all 210 drugs approved in the U.S. between 2010 and 2016 benefitted from publicly-funded resear
@1HugoZarate @RagdollsLove @RepPressley All of the 210 drugs developed from 2010-2016 received public funding https://t.co/MTC7ZbdaXZ
@LetFlameReign It’s not like the US doesn’t have “crown” corporations already https://t.co/0sK0Up25CW . All 200 of the last drugs approved by the fda were publicly funded by the NIH https://t.co/l8ACxoZ8mo
“NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the @US_FDA from 2010–2016.” #PublicSector #TrustInOurInstitutions | PNAS https://t.co/G8WILXoNLs
@trelarosa And capitalism in therapeutic development wouldn’t be what it is if not for tax payer funded research and federal management of risk that private industry would never take on or is intended to. https://t.co/G8WILXoNLs
Correct-focusing on development misses public contribution. In US, @NIH spent >$200B on basic & applied research elated to @US_FDA approved drugs 2010-2019, >85% for basic science="fundamental knowledge." @PNASNews https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l @INETec
@AlexusForbis @RBReich Pharma *already* heavily relies on public funding and research - always has. https://t.co/W9VzkpV6Ty
RT @someotheralex: In the US, "NIH [i.e. government] funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new dru…
RT @someotheralex: In the US, "NIH [i.e. government] funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new dru…
RT @someotheralex: In the US, "NIH [i.e. government] funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new dru…
In the US, "NIH [i.e. government] funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016" https://t.co/wNN94w4KgZ
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Thanks @AliciaHst440 Yup, not a lot of evidence for The Big Myth that #Pharma takes huge risks in #research & develop…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Thanks @AliciaHst440 Yup, not a lot of evidence for The Big Myth that #Pharma takes huge risks in #research & develop…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Thanks @AliciaHst440 Yup, not a lot of evidence for The Big Myth that #Pharma takes huge risks in #research & develop…
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Thanks @AliciaHst440 Yup, not a lot of evidence for The Big Myth that #Pharma takes huge risks in #research & develop…
Evil...
RT @DrNancyOlivieri: Thanks @AliciaHst440 Yup, not a lot of evidence for The Big Myth that #Pharma takes huge risks in #research & develop…
@P2BA1 @Napi4m @fendergibs @ppaullada @AOC "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/XFUfMTkt1E
@P2BA1 @ppaullada @AOC "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/XFUfMTkt1E
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/k7mKKrqV2z
@SouthrnDscomfrt @christina_phi @BuzzPatterson @JoeBiden If capitalism drives innovation, why did all 210 FDA approved drugs between 2010-16 benefit from government research funding of $100 billion? Surely pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t require governm
@AnandWrites
More: https://t.co/sHlWJ5NI8Y
@FASEBorg urged congress to provide $15.5 billion for the @NIH in supplemental funding to restore funds used for the emergency response to COVID. https://t.co/d0SkKFJFgc This funding is essential to maintain the pipeline of new cures https://t.co/kiT3K7D
@knick_knack @DawnPerri @BS_immunized @Mikel_Jollett https://t.co/FRu3iiQlSD But if you want direct research into how much NIH funding goes into drug R&D, here's a paper on that. Not one drug was found to have come out in 6 years without NIH funding.
@Christi49527439 @alixabeth Wait, are you being serious? Does your employer bear the entire cost of research? If not, where does the money (for underlying research, not product development) come from? https://t.co/EgtfyZ4okd
@FCoutinho4 @R4cc_ @FranciiscoAzz @tatianasc__ @SouaSahh No período de 2010–2016 a investigação de todas 210 as novas entidades moleculares aprovadas nos EUA tiveram origem em investigação paga pelo governo e não nas farmaceuticas. https://t.co/5aS2shB138
RT @peopleb4pharma: But don't take our word for it. Read how researchers at Bentley University found US taxpayers contributed every one of…
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
And how many of those government-funded research papers were published behind a for-profit paywall? 🤔
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
RT @almightygod: @NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https…
@NikkiHaley Out of 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 and 2016, 100% were based on government funded research: https://t.co/GBTVB0HIoB
100% of new drugs approved by the FDA between 2010 & 2016 were funded by the government. https://t.co/p8GrfwQ03T
Live the lie you choose to live cause public funding “was associated directly or indirectly with every drug approved from 2010–2016.” https://t.co/nCb6U12AQL
@tonymossuk I agree they shouldn't, but they will. Every newly approved drug in the US bw 2010 and 16 had some public funding during development. https://t.co/dMGZyZZhb7 In the US we lack a price ctrl mechanism to stop such practices.
@hitz_todd @Hitmewiththeax @Guy__101 @romcomflowers NIH budget is 42billion. A lot of this is for research with no human application and goes to academia. Pharma/Biotech spent 102billions. How much of NIH funds are for drug development? 10% ie. 4billions
But don't take our word for it. Read how researchers at Bentley University found US taxpayers contributed every one of the 210 new drugs approved between 2010 and 2016. https://t.co/LTDmd36S8L
@agamemnus_dev And that's a LOT of money. And no, it has not fallen as low as it can. Hell, you can get one in Canada *without a prescription* for about $80 American. https://t.co/oddwdQcq6G
RT @Garland2018: @Public_Citizen Most people have no idea who funds what part of the development of new molecular entities. https://t.co/3K…
RT @Garland2018: @Public_Citizen Most people have no idea who funds what part of the development of new molecular entities. https://t.co/3K…
RT @Garland2018: @Public_Citizen Most people have no idea who funds what part of the development of new molecular entities. https://t.co/3K…
RT @Garland2018: @Public_Citizen Most people have no idea who funds what part of the development of new molecular entities. https://t.co/3K…
@ProtestCheese @sebafau @ABC According to a study the National Academy of Sciences says NIH contributed to every single FDA-approved drug from 2010-2016. Essentially public funding research has been tied to greater than 90% of approved drugs. https://t.co/
RT @kenanmalik: Actually, even in America, ‘innovation’ depends hugely on public sector funding: https://t.co/6PinUptJOX https://t.co/74NbS…
From the Cover: Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/1rlJ7lkHqX
RT @kenanmalik: Actually, even in America, ‘innovation’ depends hugely on public sector funding: https://t.co/6PinUptJOX https://t.co/74NbS…
RT @kenanmalik: Actually, even in America, ‘innovation’ depends hugely on public sector funding: https://t.co/6PinUptJOX https://t.co/74NbS…
RT @kenanmalik: Actually, even in America, ‘innovation’ depends hugely on public sector funding: https://t.co/6PinUptJOX https://t.co/74NbS…
Actually, even in America, ‘innovation’ depends hugely on public sector funding: https://t.co/6PinUptJOX https://t.co/74NbSWuvqX And there are many cases demonstrating how involvement of private sector can delay the process of drug development: https://t.c
RT @SciIndustry: Research @TheLancetOncology builds on 2018 paper @PNASnews https://t.co/0NGoFykDXY showing role of @NIH funding in researc…
Research @TheLancetOncology builds on 2018 paper @PNASnews https://t.co/0NGoFykDXY showing role of @NIH funding in research underlying every new drug approval 2010-2016.
@cheesetrader1 @Loneprotester @Ryan_______1791 @Clegg_Staffing @martha_creates @virginianpilot From you and me, sure as hell not from Amazon or Boeing or Wal-Mart. They pay less in taxes than we do. https://t.co/AxoT5lNKNA
@Marc_Leibowitz BTW, the US taxpayer has invested in R&D for EVERY SINGLE FDA APPROVED DRUG from 2010 to 2016 "NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration fr
RT @WesElyMD: Did you know?...Inspiring research #COVID19. NIH+Industry. 2018 @theNAMedicine PNAS data https://t.co/Fc8eWMKmRq: every drug…
Did you know?...Inspiring research #COVID19. NIH+Industry. 2018 @theNAMedicine PNAS data https://t.co/Fc8eWMKmRq: every drug approval since 2010 traced back to $100 billion NIH budget. We've converted our largest R01 into Covid neuroscience study. Thank
@neuronsparker @zlingray Yep. From 2010-2016, literally every single new FDA-approved drug involved NIH research https://t.co/JOBbk1YSQr
Why hasn't a study been done in the USA about Hydroxychloroquine? France renowned Infectious disease doctor did a study had a better than 91% cure rate. Dr Fauci is head of NIAID/NHI where studies are done?? Works on studies. https://t.co/He6zYQYox8 https:
Why hasn't a study been done in the USA about Hydroxychloroquine? France renowned Infectious disease doctor did a study had a better than 91% cure rate. Dr Fauci is head of NIAID/NHI were studies are done?? Works on studies?? https://t.co/He6zYQYox8 http
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/fxeWcI5OVU
#Research funded by @NIH underlies every new drug approved in the past decade and will be essential to finding vaccines or drugs to treat #coronavirus https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l https://t.co/1exwcTkOqR https://t.co/iT95P6gJmy
RT @jarrin_v: Este studio científico, publicado en PNAS, determinó que cada droga de las 210 aprovadas en los EEUU, entre 2010 y 2016, inic…
RT @jarrin_v: Este studio científico, publicado en PNAS, determinó que cada droga de las 210 aprovadas en los EEUU, entre 2010 y 2016, inic…
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016. https://t.co/lAX0KNehae
RT @jarrin_v: Este studio científico, publicado en PNAS, determinó que cada droga de las 210 aprovadas en los EEUU, entre 2010 y 2016, inic…
RT @jarrin_v: Este studio científico, publicado en PNAS, determinó que cada droga de las 210 aprovadas en los EEUU, entre 2010 y 2016, inic…
RT @jarrin_v: Este studio científico, publicado en PNAS, determinó que cada droga de las 210 aprovadas en los EEUU, entre 2010 y 2016, inic…
RT @jarrin_v: Este studio científico, publicado en PNAS, determinó que cada droga de las 210 aprovadas en los EEUU, entre 2010 y 2016, inic…
Este studio científico, publicado en PNAS, determinó que cada droga de las 210 aprovadas en los EEUU, entre 2010 y 2016, iniciaron de investigación financiada por el Instituto Nacional de Salud (NIH). P. D. Nota dedicada a los libertarios criollos. https:
Hey, look, a research paper detailing that NIH funding contributed to EVERY ONE of the new drugs approved by the FDA from 2010 to 2016. But yeah, innovation will die with Medicare for All because companies can't get a 1000% markup anymore. https://t.co/1ld
@Lady_Laura @ReginaA1981 @briebriejoy The government is already largely funding medical research. "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administrat
@HansMlder1 @NOS Nee, in sommige gevallen wordt meer dan 90% van het basisonderzoek naar nieuwe geneesmiddelen betaald van publiek geld. https://t.co/oCMwaYUPal
@Mandatory_Me @IsraelAnderson @lilmissindpdnt @RealCandaceO Here you go “get your government hands off my Medicare” dunce. https://t.co/ql4TWcdMRi
@FrankGillilan13 @arhiandavies @MTreeBandit @BernieSanders Most of the basic research to develop drugs is funded by the tax payers through the National Institute of Health (NIH) which is a federal govt agency. So it is wrong to say private medical research
@AndoAnima @jackcalifano To begin with, a significant fraction of R&D is funded by the state. This analysis in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences concludes that public research contributed to every single drug approved by FDA from 2010
@LandOfT48874155 @Dgulibe @AndaIus @dhosack @BadgersandGB @JoeBiden @BernieSanders https://t.co/BT0772MiTY Turns out you don't need profit to create life saving things
@ChosenZionist @harveyjkaye @johncusack @prof_shelton @NomikiKonst @_michaelbrooks @SamSeder @adventuregirl Govt funding is behind a lot of it: https://t.co/tBv22O8zlX
@ThiagoGdeAragao Sem contar que todo o investimento em pesquisa básica, é feita praticamente pelo governo. A empresa pega lá na ponta. Olha esse paper: https://t.co/Kno2mDPnjm
@Kozmocostello @exjon Do you know what an ad hominem fallacy is? https://t.co/sPCLaK1o9I https://t.co/uLf5WFObEJ
@Scorch3earth @Sylveonist @hale_razor @BernieSanders Also good thing you just checked the site itself, not the article. If you would've looked at the article, there is atleast one hyperlink for the study. https://t.co/b09Mdfw5s2
@LibertyFreehold @Chinchillazllla @KarenJNTN @tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." h
@KarenJNTN @Chinchillazllla @tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6S
@sunsetmarieD @tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwHQX
@californianyc @tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwHQX
@Sowell_Man @YesThatAnna @tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwH
@tadsweetwater @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwHQX
@tadsweetwater @pierce_alonzo @BernieSanders "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016." https://t.co/0tJ6SqwHQX