RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Importance of basic research: "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016", study https://t.co/g1XFrEymP…
RT @rschilsky: Yet, abstracts of NIH-funded clinical trials steadily declining at ASCO as more trials conducted overseas by major pharma. N…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @cmrherder: The first line says it all: "NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs a…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
Maybe the White House should have read this prior to proposing to slash science budgets! Idiots. https://t.co/x7OjvQmyEz
Interesting article, unclear whether the methodology is being too generous, but suggests previous estimates were way too low. Be curious what the pharma ROI is on the >$64B NIH investment.... https://t.co/Nywjj2GMDZ
The first line says it all: "NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016" | Great paper by Cleary et al. in @PNASNews https://t.co/Mg2HT1LpMd
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @KaminskiMed: A powerful answer to those who doubt the value of NIH funded research to human health “NIH funding contributed to publishe…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @NulisInVerba: más sobre la importancia de financiar ciencia "básica" https://t.co/vT2vrBH5ah
RT @drkahaynes: Spot-on. This is why thinking that innovative American research contributes to the cost of American healthcare is wrong. Yo…
RT @KaminskiMed: A powerful answer to those who doubt the value of NIH funded research to human health “NIH funding contributed to publishe…
RT @NulisInVerba: más sobre la importancia de financiar ciencia "básica" https://t.co/vT2vrBH5ah
For me this is the real open access debate. https://t.co/nGHuM0vfMP
RT @rguha: An interesting article on the contribution of public funding (specifically NIH) to basic science vs therapeutic-specific researc…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
Public funding of scientific research is critical to sustain delivery of innovative therapeutic options to patients who need them. There are decades of hard work and investment behind every new breakthrough drug that makes the press. https://t.co/GLQw3gh
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @rschilsky: Yet, abstracts of NIH-funded clinical trials steadily declining at ASCO as more trials conducted overseas by major pharma. N…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Importance of basic research: "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016", study https://t.co/g1XFrEymP…
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
Bottom line: public research investment leads to new drugs that directly benefit us. There is no substitution for this research investment. The basic science that leads to new medicines comes from NIH funded labs, that's the straight-up truth. https://t.co
RT @CaulfieldTim: Importance of basic research: "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016", study https://t.co/g1XFrEymP…
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @ChemSynthBiol: The stunning impact and importance of NIH-funded research https://t.co/GNAn8Zorg1
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @ChemSynthBiol: The stunning impact and importance of NIH-funded research https://t.co/GNAn8Zorg1
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Importance of basic research: "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016", study https://t.co/g1XFrEymP…
No new basic research, no new drug targets. https://t.co/HuR7UihcVW
RT @mchvdm: RT @EricTopol: The @NIH’s basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/QXQCI6…
RT @drkahaynes: Spot-on. This is why thinking that innovative American research contributes to the cost of American healthcare is wrong. Yo…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @ScottSacane: More evidence the @NIH is an invaluable resource for #biomedical #innovation. Much of the research output from grant fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @KaminskiMed: A powerful answer to those who doubt the value of NIH funded research to human health “NIH funding contributed to publishe…
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @ScottSacane: More evidence the @NIH is an invaluable resource for #biomedical #innovation. Much of the research output from grant fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
More evidence the @NIH is an invaluable resource for #biomedical #innovation. Much of the research output from grant funding is #openaccess and available to all. Budgets should he protected. https://t.co/jVEKUcfUkc
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
Hope @CIHR_IRSC and @Bill_Morneau @JustinTrudeau can use this evidence and the FSR report from @cdavidnaylor to do the right thing for CAN Sci and provide basic science with unfettered funding in budget 2018, it leads to new therapies in unpredictable ways
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Importance of basic research: "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016", study https://t.co/g1XFrEymP…
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @ChemSynthBiol: The stunning impact and importance of NIH-funded research https://t.co/GNAn8Zorg1
RT @PedResearchURMC: "NIH funding was associated directly or indirectly with every drug approved from 2010–2016...and likely represents bas…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
"NIH funding was associated directly or indirectly with every drug approved from 2010–2016...and likely represents basic research..." https://t.co/9AfaHnVFjz
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
“../NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016.” #NIH #FDA https://t.co/aIHceNU4Yb
RT @KaminskiMed: A powerful answer to those who doubt the value of NIH funded research to human health “NIH funding contributed to publishe…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
New study from @PNAS shows... "NIH contribution to research associated with new drug approvals is greater than previously appreciated and highlights the risk of reducing federal funding for basic biomedical research." https://t.co/9AfaHnVFjz
RT @DanthiLab: Basic research matters! https://t.co/JA4csP9zDu
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @sarahkaplan48: Topical new study in PNAS: Every single one of the 210 new drugs approved by the FDA 2010-2016 was developed w/ NIH fund…
RT @norionakatsuji: この報告論文は面白い。基礎研究と応用研究の間に断絶など無くて、両方が当然ながら必要且つ重要で、繋がってるのが当たり前と考える米国らしい。米国NIHが研究費出した基礎研究の成果が、FDAが認可した210種類の新薬全ての開発に貢献しているとの…
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…
From the Abstract: "NIH funding contributed to every one of the [New Molecular Entities] approved from 2010–2016..." #BasicResearch Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/FphVSMtj4g
RT @EricTopol: The @NIH's basic research funding contributed to every @US_FDA 210 drugs approved 2010-2016! https://t.co/sfQrQyNApm @PNASNe…