We are honored to have our work on @NIH contribution to #pharmaceutical #innovation @PNASNews https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l quoted in @OECD's TOSSD - Tracking global health expenditure in support of the SDGs at https://t.co/10xBfXci5f
@jared_tyndall And BTW most of new research that is the prerequisite for new drugs being possible at all is done on government grands. https://t.co/cuFerdUCW0
@WalkerBragman Just a friendly reminder: Literally every FDA-approved drug on the market today was funded by the United States government. Why? Because Big Pharma is too cowardly to take Phase I R&D Big Risks. #PatentBelongsToThePeople https://t.c
RT @AndreaRoventini: @RobertoBurioni @FabrizioChiodo Assolutamente no! Perchè le scoperte farmaceutiche sono già interamente finanziate dal…
RT @AndreaRoventini: @RobertoBurioni @FabrizioChiodo Assolutamente no! Perchè le scoperte farmaceutiche sono già interamente finanziate dal…
@RobertoBurioni @FabrizioChiodo Assolutamente no! Perchè le scoperte farmaceutiche sono già interamente finanziate dal settore pubblico che si sobbarca i fallimenti, mentre le imprese farmaceutiche fanno extra profitti sui successi. Tra 2010-6, NIH ha fina
@WaveAether @Spiral26099025 @illinidiva12 @NateSilver538 They take promising research and productize it, which requires R&D. The point is that they're not spending private $ on the hard research, taxpayers are through Fauci. I even found a research art
Honored to have our work by Cleary et al. @PNASNews (https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l ) referenced @amprog in analysis of #value-based #drugpricing. https://t.co/LGOzb23hxp
@DoctorHenryCT NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. Collectively, this research involved >200,000 years of grant funding totaling more t
@MBbiotech did you have to say 'foolish'? "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016" https://t.co/a0ZUQa5Sl9
@celinegounder @NIH This from the period of 2010-2016. > $64 billion over 84 products: https://t.co/Vif92p9eQ7 https://t.co/MQhZk4QQq5
RT @OzbatRisa: Public funding was involved in the R & D of all 210 new drugs approved between 2010-2016 https://t.co/0AsW9HFoKs https://t.c…
RT @OzbatRisa: Public funding was involved in the R & D of all 210 new drugs approved between 2010-2016 https://t.co/0AsW9HFoKs https://t.c…
RT @OzbatRisa: Public funding was involved in the R & D of all 210 new drugs approved between 2010-2016 https://t.co/0AsW9HFoKs https://t.c…
RT @OzbatRisa: Public funding was involved in the R & D of all 210 new drugs approved between 2010-2016 https://t.co/0AsW9HFoKs https://t.c…
RT @OzbatRisa: Public funding was involved in the R & D of all 210 new drugs approved between 2010-2016 https://t.co/0AsW9HFoKs https://t.c…
Public funding was involved in the R & D of all 210 new drugs approved between 2010-2016 https://t.co/0AsW9HFoKs https://t.co/RW90wR70lL
Our work @BentleyU https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l is "...part of a larger argument over whether federal financing of basic research that serves as a foundation for many new medical treatments entitles the government to restrict the prices ..." @AAF . https://t.c
@Econ_Marshall @socio_steve Drug companies are subsidized by the United States government, who takes all the risks by funding all Phase I R&D. And I mean literally all. Every FDA-approved drug on the market today started with govt dollars https://t.c
RT @GypsyInAmerica: @soda_rock @mkraju Actually, the United States Government funds almost all early, Phase I Pharma R&D. Our tax dollars h…
@soda_rock @mkraju Actually, the United States Government funds almost all early, Phase I Pharma R&D. Our tax dollars have funded nearly every single FDA-approved drug on the market today https://t.co/ElGZj9t6fk
@AlThomp @thenecrosoviet @PunkrockPM @amyklobuchar Study itself is here: https://t.co/YPfiP55JKX My jaw dropped at this piece of data though. Collectively, this research involved >200,000 years of grant funding totaling more than $100 billion. 200,00
@rabois @VictorLauC You may also find this article interesting. It shows just how much funding through NIH impacts the development of new drugs. Probably a global phenomenon. https://t.co/SF2VsUDjb6
@amyklobuchar @PplsAction Stop all Phase I R&D funding of new pharmaceuticals until Big Pharma agrees to negotiate & lower drug prices. U.S. government has all the leverage. Use it. https://t.co/ElGZj9t6fk
RT @SScottGraham_: A lot of great insights in this article, it problematically assumes industry R&D is the wellspring of all innovation whe…
@RepUnderwood Give Medicaid the power to negotiate drug prices. Or all pharmaceutical Phase I R&D government funding ends. Am I the only one who sees who has the real leverage here?! 🤔 https://t.co/ElGZj9t6fk
A lot of great insights in this article, it problematically assumes industry R&D is the wellspring of all innovation when so much drug development is already NIH funded and subsequently commercialized. https://t.co/K36Rc96hdj
@SaltSpringSam @Bio_superior @EricTopol Interesting study in the NIH contribution here: https://t.co/XAiw0cMEFO
@asymmetricinfo @autistic_campus @larry_levitt The federal government spent $100 billion to subsidize the research on every single one of the two hundred–plus drugs approved for sale in the United States between 2010 and 2016. We pay for the R&D and t
@oreos2002 @JimDMiller @ClarkMyWords @mattyglesias This point can’t be overemphasized enough. From the report: “ report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by…(and) grant funding
@Tocho702 @itsEenyo @ManoutofTime913 @cinnamontreez Sure, lemme hit up Google and type in "what kind of experts is Tocho referring to in that one post?" Here's how it's done: every one of the 210 drugs brought to market between 2010 & 2016 depended on
RT @wgonzalezgarcia: Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/n2rldrFoQM
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/n2rldrFoQM
@Eusebius_1 @TheOmniLiberal Could you even imagine what it'd be like if the government had to fund a lot of pharmaceutical research? https://t.co/jLBvEvrgvJ https://t.co/OHubqKAaSJ
@ZuckerbergTwin @PbuzzXr @nytimes @lrozen Every single FDA drug approved since 2010 was created with public (aka taxpayer) research funds. The only thing the market does is jack up the price and keep all the profits for a small handful of executives. htt
@therecount @SenatorMitchMcM oh really no incentive to develop new drugs? NIH funding isn’t enough innovation? https://t.co/pyf4C3NJBR
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016 https://t.co/j4Nt9imGDF
RT @Doreltwt: @PandArancio @peelliwastaken @Cielo_Gore È iniziato durante la guerra fredda per dimostrare superiorità nella ricerca medica…
@PandArancio @peelliwastaken @Cielo_Gore È iniziato durante la guerra fredda per dimostrare superiorità nella ricerca medica e poi è rimasto intatto perché la gente non vuole morire di malattie (*tutte* le molecule che Pharma usa per le medicine sono stat
@mapintar @AndyCohenSD @nathanfletcher Seems like mostly taxpayers do: https://t.co/lktjT1iq0N
RT @davidsirota: “NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food & Drug…
RT @davidsirota: “NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food & Drug…
RT @davidsirota: “NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food & Drug…
@alan17h @SecYellen Pharma is among the biggest users of tax avoidance & govt spending (Medicare) & funded research. "...NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Adm
@Lint88145352 @Mmacedo_tweets Tadinho. É ciência publicada. É preciso ter lata para para negar a ciência e chamar aos outros negacionistas. https://t.co/ZPggraCJNq
This was an expanded study of research published @PNASNews "Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016" https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l
“NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. Collectively, this research involved >200,000 years of grant funding totaling more than $100B.” h
Sen. Durbin just referenced this study that NIH research referenced in every drug approved 2010-2016. https://t.co/xzAvhuRgm3
@NevSoc 😂 Just gonna leave this here tho https://t.co/ujOum10bee
@sacjai The latter are almost exclusively in industry esp for vaccines. These capabilities are hard to develop/maintain, arguably why the top pharma orgs by R&D spend have ~100 year old roots. Interesting analysis https://t.co/feo91Xtq5A @Dereklowe @l
RT @AndreaRoventini: @gianlucac1 Dal 2010 al 2016, tutti i farmaci approvati dalla FDA hanno ricevuto finanziamenti pubblici via NIH https:…
RT @jennkwanMDPhD: @repmarkpoca: In last decade, every single FDA approved💊 had @NIH research support https://t.co/UryJEEJMoD "contribution…
RT @jennkwanMDPhD: @repmarkpoca: In last decade, every single FDA approved💊 had @NIH research support https://t.co/UryJEEJMoD "contribution…
@repmarkpoca: In last decade, every single FDA approved💊 had @NIH research support https://t.co/UryJEEJMoD "contribution . . . greater than previously appreciated"
Look at Cleary et al. (2018). https://t.co/4AF5u4wMqK "This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016."
@siessdav @TGoodsamaritan @TheDandyGoblin @RepKatiePorter @limweijiet Enjoy being a big pharma shill? Are your fingers incapable of performing a simple google search or do you just pretend to be this stupid for fun? Took me less than 2 minutes to find this
@gianlucac1 Dal 2010 al 2016, tutti i farmaci approvati dalla FDA hanno ricevuto finanziamenti pubblici via NIH https://t.co/wgxko2dZdN
@IPInvest @RepKatiePorter You are wrong. They are leeches on American tax payers and you are buying into their propaganda. https://t.co/7cwVdXc57I
RT @Greeble214: @RepKatiePorter It’s even worse when you consider much of the basic research that goes into developing drugs is done at the…
@RepKatiePorter It’s even worse when you consider much of the basic research that goes into developing drugs is done at the taxpayer expense. Recent research shows reductions in NIH funding could significantly delay the emergence of new drugs in the futu
@ChimicoScettico We agree: >90% of public sector (@NIH) costs were related to #basicresearch on drug targets. This investment is similar in scale to industry investment in #drugdevelopment https://t.co/kiT3K7Ds8l @PNASNews #BentleyUResearch
Interessante. E ovviamente ultra condivisibile 👇🏻
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @MCPievatolo: Lo stesso vale per la pubblicazione scientifica: la "valorizzazione" della ricerca è in mano a editori privati finanziati…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @MCPievatolo: Lo stesso vale per la pubblicazione scientifica: la "valorizzazione" della ricerca è in mano a editori privati finanziati…
Da leggere
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @MCPievatolo: Lo stesso vale per la pubblicazione scientifica: la "valorizzazione" della ricerca è in mano a editori privati finanziati…
Lo stesso vale per la pubblicazione scientifica: la "valorizzazione" della ricerca è in mano a editori privati finanziati dal pubblico in lettura (abbonamenti) o in scrittura (APC). Essi se ne appropriano col copyright e/o raccogliendo metadati e ci riven
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
RT @AndreaRoventini: THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e i…
THREAD 1/4 Il modello d'innovazione dell'industria farmaceutica è costoso e non funziona bene. Per es. tra il 2000 e il 2016, tutte i farmaci approvati in USA da FDA hanno ricevuto finanziamenti pubblici dal NIH, ma le imprese si appropriano dei brevetti h
- Entre 2010 e 2016 foram aprovados pela FDA, a entidade reguladora dos medicamentos no EUA, 210 novos medicamentos e todos eles, todos, receberam financiamento público. Ao todo, o governo federal norte-americano gastou 100 mil milhões de dólares; fonte: h
RT @NikosMichailid4: Μην είμαστε ακραίοι,πάρα πολλά από τα φάρμακα που χρησιμοποιούμε χρηματοδοτήθηκαν ερευνητικά ΚΑΙ από πολύ δημόσιο χρήμ…
RT @NikosMichailid4: Μην είμαστε ακραίοι,πάρα πολλά από τα φάρμακα που χρησιμοποιούμε χρηματοδοτήθηκαν ερευνητικά ΚΑΙ από πολύ δημόσιο χρήμ…
Μην είμαστε ακραίοι,πάρα πολλά από τα φάρμακα που χρησιμοποιούμε χρηματοδοτήθηκαν ερευνητικά ΚΑΙ από πολύ δημόσιο χρήμα «The role of NIH funding complements industry research and development, which focuses predominantly on applied research.»Ας διαβάσουμε
@matthewo67 @Christo07982188 @JStein_WaPo Oh and did we happen to mention that all 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016 had some form of NIH funding, to a total of approximately $100 billion? https://t.co/gokxyA4Ptk and that funding continues to th
@steveubl You forgot the commercialization of academic research. All 210 drugs approved by the FDA from 2010-2016 received NIH funding. It’s crony capitalism, let’s not forget or deceive the public here. https://t.co/Juikm7vDLo
@DisDisInformant @texandedede @BimboPolitic @CNBCnow Most new medicines are actually funded mostly by taxpayers, but profited off of by pharmaceutical companies who take advantage of a lack of price controls in the US. https://t.co/2bEFwYlO3V
@glareone @CNBCnow Lmao read this study before you hurt yourself https://t.co/7cwVdXtGwi
@DogPhoenixWP @CNBCnow Tax payers fund every vaccine and drug dumbass https://t.co/7cwVdXtGwi
@RickTheAlien718 @HarryMbike @AnandWrites as is nearly every drug that makes it through the FDA. https://t.co/AhgkiKY4KB https://t.co/CuhUXBbFcJ