@fchollet You might find this interesting. I listened to your interview with @lexfridman and psychometrics seems to be our mutual interest. https://t.co/ASygRO7ZRW
I don't know, but platforms managed to know our personality better than our partners (https://t.co/FvfI98xSgY), they should be able to help solving a problem that they (co-)created. There is lots of expertise on these issues (see also original post). /10
@dspin65 @alexbrooks @waltmossberg This is incorrect, the FB algorithm knows you more than you think. your phone isn't 'listening in' to server you ads. It doesn't have to https://t.co/fwuKAg8mju
@Soccermatics Many studies show that personality can be accurately predicted from digital footprints, e.g., https://t.co/uXtu04TM0f, https://t.co/4kfnqROFUF, or https://t.co/E70ysk9Df8
@ZitaPatai That happened a few years ago and was part of the social network big data machine learning hype. Here are some of the initial publications, which are already 7 years old and which still pretty scary https://t.co/7NnToZuwuh and https://t.co/tqwSK
Статья Михала Косински, которая доказывает, почему компьютеры знают нас лучше, чем наши близкие. Кроме того, они прогнозируют более точные результаты политических взглядов, физического здоровья и зависимостей 🤖 https://t.co/S3LQWQUKey
Enquanto a direita populista propaga o medo do globalismo q quer acabar c/ "soberania nacional". Um estudo d 2015, ja mostrava c/ um algoritimo é mais preciso q um humano. Com 300 curtidas, o modelo conhecia a pessoa melhor que seu próprio cônjuge. http
Study: https://t.co/2EWehxMXKw From @chrisinsilico's book: MINDF*CK — a must read on Cambridge Analytica
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/Lv2uxXx85l
Você sabia que sua rede social com... https://t.co/Ac9q5cSRVN https://t.co/8CEHIbRvyp
@steffenbuenau @lehrjulian @caffeinatedwes It is: https://t.co/7vFQpRFt5u Not the least ironic that it was conducted in Cambridge using a personality app... https://t.co/jW80RnuviP
@ewout Deze is invloedrijk maar ook zeer controversieel (speelde rol bij Cambridge Analytica). Of die zin echt waar is, en *hoe* die waar is, is een van de onderzoeksvragen. https://t.co/LZICZ9sNPS Dit NRC stuk is ook behulpzaam: https://t.co/5Xjhupk4L4
RT @amarpreetkalkat: And the other gentleman, John Scott, he clearly has no idea what he is speaking about. "There is no science behind thi…
And the other gentleman, John Scott, he clearly has no idea what he is speaking about. "There is no science behind this", seriously John? Well, how about: https://t.co/R4PYsaLlsv and : https://t.co/1Izm3XPykx I can cite a dozen more papers John, what hav
@MarcdeFalco @michalkosinski J'ai trouvé, c'est la figure 2 de (accès libre) "Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans" publié dans PNAS en 2015 https://t.co/Ddanbgz8Ah
That said, the reliability (while bigger than inter-judge) isn't too big. It's still better than most other predictions we have, which is all it needs to be useful. I kinda wish personality quizzes would give rough predictions of life outcomes! https://t.
The linked paper shows that computers can predict personality better than humans, given sufficient data (~200 facebook likes). We reveal the footprint of who we are wherever we go! We can try and hide it but unless we're always faking we will fail. https:
Once you've liked 300 things on Facebook, it knows you better than your spouse. https://t.co/TcdckWTlxd
It might be good to remember this research which claims that computers’ judgments of people’s personalities are more accurate and valid than judgments made by their close others or acquaintances (friends, family, spouse, colleagues, etc.). https://t.co/LiD
RT @laura_greenaura: #TrumpsWar That Facebook data could be used for #political micro-targeting began being published in scientific literat…
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/elISxIZVRo
We think it's odd that technology companies know us better than our best friends, partners and parents. https://t.co/1Su6DYJCnz
@stephanekoch @palrogg Il existe différents travaux intéressants sur le sujet: https://t.co/7yJforhT5H. Les big5 sont un grand classique en analyse du comportement politique. Pouvoir les prédire par des likes est intéressant mais ne marche que dans certain
La technique utilisée n'était pas tellement secrète. https://t.co/7yJforhT5H
RT @laura_greenaura: #TrumpsWar That Facebook data could be used for #political micro-targeting began being published in scientific literat…
RT @laura_greenaura: #TrumpsWar That Facebook data could be used for #political micro-targeting began being published in scientific literat…
RT @laura_greenaura: #TrumpsWar That Facebook data could be used for #political micro-targeting began being published in scientific literat…
#TrumpsWar That Facebook data could be used for #political micro-targeting began being published in scientific literature in the last few years. Here 's a 2015 paper from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on it. #machinelearning #datascience
RT @laura_greenaura: @BeresfordPeter Then I would hire a genius hotshot 20-something programmer and let him go to town to use machine learn…
@BeresfordPeter Then I would hire a genius hotshot 20-something programmer and let him go to town to use machine learning from Facebook likes to predict people’s personalities to play to their emotions and fears for political purposes. https://t.co/velbe1
RT @Agredo10: Sehr gutes Video über Privatsphäre und wie gefährdet sie ist! Ich empfehle diese beiden Studien, um sich ein noch etwas gena…
Sehr gutes Video über Privatsphäre und wie gefährdet sie ist! Ich empfehle diese beiden Studien, um sich ein noch etwas genaueres Bild zu machen: https://t.co/8ji6MhXwvX https://t.co/g0q34DECx0
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans (paper) - PNAS https://t.co/OJHaDDPjPU #AI
#ELIV2019 How many Facebook likes are needed, that AI knows you better than your partner? (Cambridge University researchers have developed SW which can predict human personality better than close family members, based on not more than 300 FB likes —https:
Take a moment to digest this graph.
And he was right, because here's the result. It's my favourite graph from all of my papers and I use it in nearly every presentation I give. It's simple, clear, tells a neat story, looks great, and is memorable. 5/6 https://t.co/yp6tstc1IR https://t.co/Fw
@kreissdaniel Hey! Okay, so check out: https://t.co/tRWdLIj7KE and https://t.co/7Dx66mjOIn Tl:Dr - Algorithms can be complex enough to pick up on subconscious impulses of individuals and learn them (predict actions/needs) better than their conscious sel
86,220 participant study shows that algorithms need a set of only 150 of your Facebook likes in order to outperform your family members in predicting answers to personality questions you answer. 300 likes & the computer knows you better than your spous
Our facebook traces, aka our “Likes”, know more about ourself than our friends. Than our relatives. Than our partners. Scary enough, they know us better than ourselves. https://t.co/ORspp3WMTd
Luego a principios del 2014 por medio de la universidad de Boeing, Kosinski publicó la tesis definitiva de dicho proyecto. Wylie se topó con dicha tésis y vio cómo aquello podía tener un impacto mucho mas grande de lo que todos pensaban. https://t.co/Ngrj
Computer based personality judgements are more accurate than human judgements https://t.co/ML4bJr3pSJ #elss19
RT @SinanAlper_: Facebook'ta beğendiğiniz şeyleri takip ederek kişilik profilinizi çıkartan formül, insanların kişilik özelliklerini aile v…
🙄 peki
RT @SinanAlper_: Facebook'ta beğendiğiniz şeyleri takip ederek kişilik profilinizi çıkartan formül, insanların kişilik özelliklerini aile v…
RT @SinanAlper_: Facebook'ta beğendiğiniz şeyleri takip ederek kişilik profilinizi çıkartan formül, insanların kişilik özelliklerini aile v…
Facebook'ta beğendiğiniz şeyleri takip ederek kişilik profilinizi çıkartan formül, insanların kişilik özelliklerini aile ve arkadaşlarından daha iyi tahmin etmiş. https://t.co/WIfT4Kg8rp https://t.co/eP54YqpL4f
@nellaneva94 Computer knows you better than your family—sometimes even more than your own self. And they were only fed with your Facebook likes, nothing more. Studinya: https://t.co/c22MXgQqlT Now imagine voice recognition combined with this.
Computer-based personality judgments accuracy. A paper. https://t.co/tZ9Ss5FYq1
Je m'étonne qu'avec une telle étude parue il y a 4 ans, le recours aux données personnelles ne fasse pas l'objet d'une remise en question beaucoup plus large. https://t.co/B7SImq5nK1 (Citée par @judithduportail dans "L'amour sous algorithme", Ed. Goutte d'
Kişilik tahmininde mesela çok iddialılar. Facebook'ta like'lanan içerik üzerinden yapılan tahminlerde kişinin arkadaşlarından, eşinden ve annesinden daha başarılı olduklarını söylüyorlar. Yani sizi onlardan iyi tanıyorlar : ) https://t.co/iXkOnW3OEx https:
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/j8R1hPWZn6 via @instapaper
Your computer (Facebook😖) knows you better than your mom Facebook Likes predict personality and other psychological traits Participants with ✔high openness to experience like Salvador Dalí, meditation, or TED talks ✔high extraversion like partying, Snoo
"Computers’ judgments of people’s personalities based on their digital footprints are more accurate and valid than judgments made by friends, family, spouse, colleagues, etc." @PNASNews #AI https://t.co/tVkfYWbQ74 https://t.co/CRAN5szTjy
RT @Atti2deTest: “Eppur si muove...” “And yet it moves ” (G.Galilei) https://t.co/UR6fNgdp6n
“Eppur si muove...” “And yet it moves ” (G.Galilei) https://t.co/UR6fNgdp6n
According to researchers at Cambridge & Stanford, AI knows your personality better than your friends do. With less than 70 Facebook “likes”, an AI powered system surpasses your friends' ability in describing your personality and predicting your actio
https://t.co/BbYY5oSCH6 في هذه الورقة البحثية قام مجموعة من الباحثين من جامعتي Cambridge و Stanford باستخدام لايكات الفيسبوك للتعرف على السمات الشخصية لمجموعة من الأشخاص و قارنوها بإجابات أناس مقربين من هؤلاء الأشحاص و تبين أنها تفوقت عليهم من حيث دقة التن
@RositaRijtano @evaristegal0is Vabe', mi scordo i dettagli. Vogliamo fare risk assessment sui falsi positivi? Ok. Allora si prendono i falsi positivi prodotti dalla gestione "umana" e li si confronta con quelli "automatici": lettura interessante: https://t
@RositaRijtano @evaristegal0is Per esempio questo: https://t.co/dtf2r5rp6H O questo: https://t.co/IqwlekxCas
RT @jotadoce_: ¿Qué piensas? 🤔 https://t.co/8Fk5SRKiGd
¿Qué piensas? 🤔
RT @1776_economics: Esto es muy curioso. Estudian los "Likes" de 70.000 usuarios de Facebook. Conclusión: El modelo del ordenador con: 10…
🗣Debatimos sobre➡"Facebook te conoce mejor que tu familia analizando 100 me gustas" 🤔Para más información artículo de @Gizmodo 👉https://t.co/i6C4ld0MEN y artículo original (2015)😉👉https://t.co/owBdRX2NyE ¿Qué os parece? ¿Real? ¿Exagerado? #IntromktUGR htt
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/ABupGHv5S7
@Jessicae13Eaton @DaveDavidDave_ @BPSOfficial The research done by the Psychometrics Centre is, partly, published here. It's a validation study of their psychometric model. https://t.co/tcZLnE94PT
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Not sure I believe this but it's scary all the same. https://t.co/rYy4NqFR77 https://t.co/2pLYFMv8ik
RT @RedKahina: Oh yes its all about helping people trust eachother https://t.co/LWnJtOtBo3 https://t.co/jtvHnecMWj https://t.co/qWG3cFEHlt
RT @RedKahina: Oh yes its all about helping people trust eachother https://t.co/LWnJtOtBo3 https://t.co/jtvHnecMWj https://t.co/qWG3cFEHlt
Oh yes its all about helping people trust eachother https://t.co/LWnJtOtBo3 https://t.co/jtvHnecMWj https://t.co/qWG3cFEHlt
Michal Kosinski et al. (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. PNAS. https://t.co/VTuCbrFnvH
B-b-b-b-but muh bias
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/OmijipI8Sl
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/KclmKjr5eN
Chegamos no futuro
Computadores são mais eficientes em descobrir características de personalidade do que as próprias pessoas. Buguei. https://t.co/zSMZ8gTUB7
RT @kaihiraishi: これか/Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/n1CmOPM4ki
RT @kaihiraishi: これか/Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/n1CmOPM4ki
これか/Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/n1CmOPM4ki
RT @Forchielli: People’s personalities can be predicted automatically and without involving human social-cognitive skills. https://t.co/CKZ…
RT @Forchielli: People’s personalities can be predicted automatically and without involving human social-cognitive skills. https://t.co/CKZ…
RT @Forchielli: People’s personalities can be predicted automatically and without involving human social-cognitive skills. https://t.co/CKZ…
RT @Forchielli: People’s personalities can be predicted automatically and without involving human social-cognitive skills. https://t.co/CKZ…
People’s personalities can be predicted automatically and without involving human social-cognitive skills. https://t.co/CKZ4JsZ41D
People’s personalities can be predicted automatically and without involving human social-cognitive skills. https://t.co/CKZ4JsHsD3
what is a personality trait....?
RT @MadJoyTrimble: @dynarski If you're interested in this topic, @david_stillwell has an interesting paper comparing predictions of a perso…
@dynarski If you're interested in this topic, @david_stillwell has an interesting paper comparing predictions of a person's personality from friends/family vs their digital footprint https://t.co/azzn33eA0S (PS i'm also consistently ENFP even though I kno
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/pUYuzIUvQ2
RT @filhaprodiga: @tom_peters @fvicentedasilva @nytimes Yet somehow no one saw it comming https://t.co/q0G5ogl8H9
@tom_peters @fvicentedasilva @nytimes Yet somehow no one saw it comming https://t.co/q0G5ogl8H9