↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
249 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
342 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
708 Mendeley
Title
Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1720347115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikhil Garg, Londa Schiebinger, Dan Jurafsky, James Zou

Abstract

Word embeddings are a powerful machine-learning framework that represents each English word by a vector. The geometric relationship between these vectors captures meaningful semantic relationships between the corresponding words. In this paper, we develop a framework to demonstrate how the temporal dynamics of the embedding helps to quantify changes in stereotypes and attitudes toward women and ethnic minorities in the 20th and 21st centuries in the United States. We integrate word embeddings trained on 100 y of text data with the US Census to show that changes in the embedding track closely with demographic and occupation shifts over time. The embedding captures societal shifts-e.g., the women's movement in the 1960s and Asian immigration into the United States-and also illuminates how specific adjectives and occupations became more closely associated with certain populations over time. Our framework for temporal analysis of word embedding opens up a fruitful intersection between machine learning and quantitative social science.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 249 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 708 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 708 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 165 23%
Student > Master 96 14%
Researcher 76 11%
Student > Bachelor 73 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 5%
Other 107 15%
Unknown 156 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 164 23%
Social Sciences 119 17%
Psychology 57 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 31 4%
Linguistics 24 3%
Other 140 20%
Unknown 173 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 361. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#76,158
of 23,373,475 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,800
of 99,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,119
of 330,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#49
of 1,016 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,373,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,016 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.