The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Extinction risk is most acute for the world’s largest and smallest vertebrates
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1702078114 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Michael Hoffmann, Aaron J. Wirsing, Douglas J. McCauley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 19 | 9% |
Australia | 14 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 4% |
Canada | 7 | 3% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
France | 3 | 1% |
New Zealand | 3 | 1% |
Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 4% |
Unknown | 132 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 134 | 66% |
Scientists | 64 | 32% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 573 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 117 | 20% |
Student > Master | 82 | 14% |
Researcher | 80 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 78 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 4% |
Other | 80 | 14% |
Unknown | 113 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 229 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 134 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 3% |
Engineering | 6 | 1% |
Other | 28 | 5% |
Unknown | 135 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 596. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#39,136
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,079
of 103,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#740
of 326,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#23
of 974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.