↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Article Metrics

Extinction risk is most acute for the world’s largest and smallest vertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
53 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
209 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
Title
Extinction risk is most acute for the world’s largest and smallest vertebrates
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2017
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1702078114
Pubmed ID
Authors

William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Michael Hoffmann, Aaron J. Wirsing, Douglas J. McCauley

Abstract

Extinction risk in vertebrates has been linked to large body size, but this putative relationship has only been explored for select taxa, with variable results. Using a newly assembled and taxonomically expansive database, we analyzed the relationships between extinction risk and body mass (27,647 species) and between extinction risk and range size (21,294 species) for vertebrates across six main classes. We found that the probability of being threatened was positively and significantly related to body mass for birds, cartilaginous fishes, and mammals. Bimodal relationships were evident for amphibians, reptiles, and bony fishes. Most importantly, a bimodal relationship was found across all vertebrates such that extinction risk changes around a body mass breakpoint of 0.035 kg, indicating that the lightest and heaviest vertebrates have elevated extinction risk. We also found range size to be an important predictor of the probability of being threatened, with strong negative relationships across nearly all taxa. A review of the drivers of extinction risk revealed that the heaviest vertebrates are most threatened by direct killing by humans. By contrast, the lightest vertebrates are most threatened by habitat loss and modification stemming especially from pollution, agricultural cropping, and logging. Our results offer insight into halting the ongoing wave of vertebrate extinctions by revealing the vulnerability of large and small taxa, and identifying size-specific threats. Moreover, they indicate that, without intervention, anthropogenic activities will soon precipitate a double truncation of the size distribution of the world's vertebrates, fundamentally reordering the structure of life on our planet.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 209 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 331 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 22%
Student > Master 57 17%
Researcher 50 15%
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 34 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 47%
Environmental Science 86 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 49 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 577. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2020.
All research outputs
#16,995
of 15,604,031 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#550
of 85,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#631
of 276,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16
of 941 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,604,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 941 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.