The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Targeted neurostimulation reverses a spatiotemporal biomarker of treatment-resistant depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2218958120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anish Mitra, Marcus E. Raichle, Andrew D. Geoly, Ian H. Kratter, Nolan R. Williams |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Serbia | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 63% |
| Scientists | 21 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 17 | 35% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 443. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#68,682
of 26,787,735 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,661
of 105,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,821
of 406,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#44
of 839 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,787,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 839 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.