| Title |
Reduced fire severity offers near-term buffer to climate-driven declines in conifer resilience across the western United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2208120120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kimberley T. Davis, Marcos D. Robles, Kerry B. Kemp, Philip E. Higuera, Teresa Chapman, Kerry L. Metlen, Jamie L. Peeler, Kyle C. Rodman, Travis Woolley, Robert N. Addington, Brian J. Buma, C. Alina Cansler, Michael J. Case, Brandon M. Collins, Jonathan D. Coop, Solomon Z. Dobrowski, Nathan S. Gill, Collin Haffey, Lucas B. Harris, Brian J. Harvey, Ryan D. Haugo, Matthew D. Hurteau, Dominik Kulakowski, Caitlin E. Littlefield, Lisa A. McCauley, Nicholas Povak, Kristen L. Shive, Edward Smith, Jens T. Stevens, Camille S. Stevens-Rumann, Alan H. Taylor, Alan J. Tepley, Derek J. N. Young, Robert A. Andrus, Mike A. Battaglia, Julia K. Berkey, Sebastian U. Busby, Amanda R. Carlson, Marin E. Chambers, Erich Kyle Dodson, Daniel C. Donato, William M. Downing, Paula J. Fornwalt, Joshua S. Halofsky, Ashley Hoffman, Andrés Holz, Jose M. Iniguez, Meg A. Krawchuk, Mark R. Kreider, Andrew J. Larson, Garrett W. Meigs, John Paul Roccaforte, Monica T. Rother, Hugh Safford, Michael Schaedel, Jason S. Sibold, Megan P. Singleton, Monica G. Turner, Alexandra K. Urza, Kyra D. Clark-Wolf, Larissa Yocom, Joseph B. Fontaine, John L. Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 46% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 58% |
| Scientists | 33 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1097. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,260
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#448
of 104,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#445
of 429,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#12
of 913 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 913 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.