The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 769 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Beyond the hockey stick: Climate lessons from the Common Era
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2112797118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael E. Mann |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 97 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 2% |
| Canada | 14 | 2% |
| Germany | 13 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 4% |
| Unknown | 578 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 649 | 84% |
| Scientists | 87 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 18% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 589. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2024.
All research outputs
#41,532
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,121
of 104,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,306
of 440,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#26
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.