| Title |
Is there tree senescence? The fecundity evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2106130118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tong Qiu, Marie-Claire Aravena, Robert Andrus, Davide Ascoli, Yves Bergeron, Roberta Berretti, Michal Bogdziewicz, Thomas Boivin, Raul Bonal, Thomas Caignard, Rafael Calama, J. Julio Camarero, Connie J. Clark, Benoit Courbaud, Sylvain Delzon, Sergio Donoso Calderon, William Farfan-Rios, Catherine A. Gehring, Gregory S. Gilbert, Cathryn H. Greenberg, Qinfeng Guo, Janneke Hille Ris Lambers, Kazuhiko Hoshizaki, Ines Ibanez, Valentin Journé, Christopher L. Kilner, Richard K. Kobe, Walter D. Koenig, Georges Kunstler, Jalene M. LaMontagne, Mateusz Ledwon, James A. Lutz, Renzo Motta, Jonathan A. Myers, Thomas A. Nagel, Chase L. Nuñez, Ian S. Pearse, Łukasz Piechnik, John R. Poulsen, Renata Poulton-Kamakura, Miranda D. Redmond, Chantal D. Reid, Kyle C. Rodman, C. Lane Scher, Harald Schmidt Van Marle, Barbara Seget, Shubhi Sharma, Miles Silman, Jennifer J. Swenson, Margaret Swift, Maria Uriarte, Giorgio Vacchiano, Thomas T. Veblen, Amy V. Whipple, Thomas G. Whitham, Andreas P. Wion, S. Joseph Wright, Kai Zhu, Jess K. Zimmerman, Magdalena Żywiec, James S. Clark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 52% |
| Scientists | 37 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#282,450
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,171
of 103,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,464
of 423,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#124
of 1,040 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,040 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.