| Title |
DNA barcoding identifies cryptic animal tool materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2020699118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew P. Steele, Linda E. Neaves, Barbara C. Klump, James J. H. St Clair, Joana R. S. M. Fernandes, Vanessa Hequet, Phil Shaw, Peter M. Hollingsworth, Christian Rutz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| New Caledonia | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 33 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 80% |
| Scientists | 10 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 797. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#24,177
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#735
of 103,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#971
of 449,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#24
of 983 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 983 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.