“When both infectious and susceptible wear FFP2 masks, that is, Fig. 4B, a reduction in the risk of infection by a factor of ∼75 is expected compared with the case where both wear surgical masks” https://t.co/GVO1Tqk9bG Prof. Paul Danger Kelly living on t
RT @DavidGollogly: @covid19nz Could you please bring your advice in line with the evidence? You are doing the public a disservice by recom…
RT @DavidGollogly: @AbraarKaran @ToshiAkima Fit testing everyone is a massive task. For public use, a conformed n95, but not fit-tested, is…
@covid19nz Could you please bring your advice in line with the evidence? You are doing the public a disservice by recommending surgical masks and failing to recommend N95s. And increasing our risk of infection 10x, per CDC, and 74x, per Bagheri et al. ht
RT @DavidGollogly: @AbraarKaran @ToshiAkima Fit testing everyone is a massive task. For public use, a conformed n95, but not fit-tested, is…
@AbraarKaran @ToshiAkima Fit testing everyone is a massive task. For public use, a conformed n95, but not fit-tested, is still 74x better than a surgical mask. This study and others ⬇️ https://t.co/BfD7et2FFk https://t.co/UWDJuudttl
Mask wearing is the perfect example. It's not a one-way process. Just asking the vulnerable to mask offers less protection than if everyone in a room is masking. And yes, there is published research on this if you want to split hairs https://t.co/LrOqK9iP
RT @DavidGollogly: @Fiona_M_Russell Other research shows N95s that are merely conformed to the nose, and not fit tested, are much superior…
RT @CovidSafeNZ: Concerns about wearing N95 masks that aren’t fit tested are exaggerated. But, even if the MOH doesn’t want to recommend or…
@HickertBenedikt @Erinnerung17 „Mögliche Größe kleinerer Aerosole“ bedeutet, man weiß es nicht. Und die Tests werden mangels dieser Aerosole mit Dolomitenstaub durchgeführt. https://t.co/vIzAFp1yvg
@leseerlaubnis @derspiegel Ja, sie wirken gegen Dolomitenstaub. https://t.co/vIzAFp1yvg
@Some1elseULTRA @wieerdieweltsa1 @FakeControlArea Gibt etliche Studien zur Wirksamkeit der Maske https://t.co/r8W5VGFxTR
RT @StevenC_in_NYC: If everyone wears a well fitted N95 mask, there's an extremely low risk of transmission. But just one person wearing on…
If everyone wears a well fitted N95 mask, there's an extremely low risk of transmission. But just one person wearing one still affords that person some protection. https://t.co/6CAhgys5IA
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
@besserwissi @bleistifterin @CorneliaBeeking Aktuelle wären solche Sachen: https://t.co/oD9ML3OnK4 https://t.co/ruLjAvgTH4 https://t.co/J5KAYCaLzm Etc. Pp. Immer schön updaten! ;-)
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @WolfmannotJack: >4. Desweiteren möchte ich Ihnen für die nächste Aktualisierung diese Studien neueren Datums ans Herz legen. https://t…
RT @WolfmannotJack: >4. Desweiteren möchte ich Ihnen für die nächste Aktualisierung diese Studien neueren Datums ans Herz legen. https://t…
@bibinhafc @__nRv___ @MEUNIERPatric11 @FLAHAULT @Annette_LEXA 👏👏👏👏🤣🤣🤣🤣🙄🤣🙄 De rien https://t.co/6nPPpbYNMk
@sabi_ri @MarcoBuschmann @berlinerzeitung ... und die Belegstudie dazu https://t.co/EzfSj7mfwi
RT @WolfmannotJack: >4. Desweiteren möchte ich Ihnen für die nächste Aktualisierung diese Studien neueren Datums ans Herz legen. https://t…
>4. Desweiteren möchte ich Ihnen für die nächste Aktualisierung diese Studien neueren Datums ans Herz legen. https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/iok16LBC99 https://t.co/EOT9Zx0j1x https://t.co/mmAwTgM8CG https://t.co/bzd3Af2Dbx https://t.co/P4hiM
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @sabi_ri: @Fazer_DDorf @JoergZajonc @Uns_Uwe_ @MarcoBuschmann 2/ Studie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft https://t.co/guWSaB9Oym
RT @sabi_ri: 3/ Vergleichsstudie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Schutzwirkung unterschiedlicher Masken und Trageweise: FFP2-Masken schütze…
RT @sabi_ri: 3/ Vergleichsstudie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Schutzwirkung unterschiedlicher Masken und Trageweise: FFP2-Masken schütze…
RT @sabi_ri: 3/ Vergleichsstudie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Schutzwirkung unterschiedlicher Masken und Trageweise: FFP2-Masken schütze…
RT @sabi_ri: 3/ Vergleichsstudie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Schutzwirkung unterschiedlicher Masken und Trageweise: FFP2-Masken schütze…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @BagheriMos: With masks for Omicron, the upper bound of infection risk is lower than Delta. We assumed that Omicron is three times more…
RT @sabi_ri: 3/ Vergleichsstudie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Schutzwirkung unterschiedlicher Masken und Trageweise: FFP2-Masken schütze…
@Grisu_LP @DrCatlicious @Martin_Sauer @NicSchall @19CherryB97 @hollygoes @tattoolady20202 @st_hennermann @Hosenmaus1 @almicka @BenFX_ selbst ne schief sitzende Maske schützt besser als gar keine ... https://t.co/guWSaBrpWW
RT @sabi_ri: 3/ Vergleichsstudie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Schutzwirkung unterschiedlicher Masken und Trageweise: FFP2-Masken schütze…
RT @sabi_ri: 3/ Vergleichsstudie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Schutzwirkung unterschiedlicher Masken und Trageweise: FFP2-Masken schütze…
3/ Vergleichsstudie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Schutzwirkung unterschiedlicher Masken und Trageweise: FFP2-Masken schützen hervorragend, auch gegen Omikron #Maskenpflicht https://t.co/guWSaBrpWW
@Fazer_DDorf @JoergZajonc @Uns_Uwe_ @MarcoBuschmann 2/ Studie der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft https://t.co/guWSaB9Oym
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @DailyKaffee: @WiserThanActing @AchimDG @andree_dominik Ja, les mal, du Clown. Und die Referenzen im Anhang nicht vergessen, damit du au…
@MEUNIERPatric11 @Annette_LEXA @FLAHAULT Qu'est ce que tu ne comprends pas dans le concept de la parole (postillonnage, etc) ? Est-ce qu'avec une image c'est plus parlant ? Ou avec d'autres articles ? https://t.co/MZSGz9YjFg https://t.co/E8UkKEoFv9 https:
@Favilla_Lotter @Freiheit20001 @HZumli @Karl_Lauterbach Sieht mir nicht nach nichts aus. Es gibt da durchaus genug Nachweise und medizinsiche Studien die die Wirksamkeit von Masken bestätigen. https://t.co/HBaHqxkCRx https://t.co/7w10M9oF4t https://t.co/p
英語読める人は、以下の論文を読んでみて。 https://t.co/cMfIicdldg #COVID19
COVID19に対してマスク着用は有効だと思います。 ソース https://t.co/6ZmOh9eii8 以下は要旨。 https://t.co/9BrkB9RYgm
RT @molliekatie: If you want to read some direct science on the importance of wearing face masks instead of news media reporting, here are…
Just your daily reminder that mask wearing must be a collective effort and not something only for the vulnerable. There is research on this, and it's clear. For public spaces to be safe to all, everyone should wear masks https://t.co/LrOqK9iPKK
RT @Comm_in_Care: “Our results show face #masks significantly reduce risk of #SARSCoV2 infection compared to social distancing. We find ver…
RT @Comm_in_Care: “Our results show face #masks significantly reduce risk of #SARSCoV2 infection compared to social distancing. We find ver…
RT @molliekatie: If you want to read some direct science on the importance of wearing face masks instead of news media reporting, here are…
@science63424214 @Echt_jetzt_ @Dani06635421 Nö. Richtig getragene FFP2 Masken reduzieren das persönliche Infektionsrisiko enorm. Dafür gibt es klare Evidenz. https://t.co/Mhe5j00QMp
@barelyrepresse1 @ConcernedScien7 @HelenRSalisbury Not necessarily, but ignorant most definitely. Should have gone to specsavers: https://t.co/Bwbheu2dYS https://t.co/mmAwTgM8CG https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/iok16LBC99 https://t.co/EOT9Zx0j1x
@MaskedQuestion @RMattke17 Ich denke hier wird man fuendig… 🤓 Achtung, beim Blick auf 213 gilt: Hinsetzen, Kartonwein aufreißen, loslesen und nach 2 Minuten saufen! 😉 @oliverbeige , dem man folgen sollte, nannte das so schön „Studien/Wissenschaft aus dem
@kdollsweety @DrJayneMorgan No you are wrong -
@CryptoCarti_ @CZECHmate789 @mbobby82 @jstylman I've already explained this in many other comments. https://t.co/vzRLRPxBKb
@systemanalysen Sehr geil. Pinkelphantasien und die erste Seite einer Studie von 2013/14. Du bist wirklich eine Top-Koryphäe. Schau mal was Laien dazu schreiben. https://t.co/Ihg3a5fOI3
RT @ZHallberg: @Mariso83 @myrabatchelder As a microbiologist I am HERE for science talk! https://t.co/0nv3RM66SU If you want an N95 to be…
RT @veritasini: @CZECHmate789 @mbobby82 @jstylman A recent study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences e…
@CZECHmate789 @mbobby82 @jstylman A recent study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences estimated that the risk of COVID-19 transmission can be reduced up to 75-fold when a sick person and someone nearby both wear N95-styl
@ToddRAllen1 @Mariso83 @myrabatchelder I have more references but this one is the closest at hand. Masks are themselves protective! https://t.co/4umYnqoHCP
@Mariso83 @myrabatchelder As a microbiologist I am HERE for science talk! https://t.co/0nv3RM66SU If you want an N95 to be *maximally* effective, it must be fit tested, but an average person trying an N95 is able to achieve filtration of at least 88% wit
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @mgranovetter: Wearing a mask when exposed to a carrier with no mask: upper bound risk of infection is 30% When everyone is masked: upp…
RT @WolfmannotJack: @jeremyphoward @dgurdasani1 👍🏼Great & timely thread. I’m sure you know all of these papers & reports showing mask benef…
2022 and they're still doing the "my mask works better when you..." shtick 🤣🤪 https://t.co/z4Sc28SL5U
People are still saying masks are not important…This study shows ‘wearing appropriate masks in the community provides excellent protection for others and oneself, and makes social distancing less important’ #wearamask https://t.co/6NkeGWE2KO
@TrentDupuy @amannastro Right. For the record, this is what I often use as an example to argue against (2), because it has a good figures, but it is entirely possible I've missed something. https://t.co/D3hnVnR5Tp
RT @vanranstmarc: FFP2-maskers werken zeer goed om een COVID-infectie te vermijden. Voor mensen met een minder robuuste gezondheid die in e…
RT @carol_perelman: Estudio🇩🇪 encontró q uso de KN95 o FFP2 bien ajustado da la mayor proyección✅ Mientras q uso de 😷 quirúrgico por 20 mi…
RT @carol_perelman: Estudio🇩🇪 encontró q uso de KN95 o FFP2 bien ajustado da la mayor proyección✅ Mientras q uso de 😷 quirúrgico por 20 mi…
RT @carol_perelman: Estudio🇩🇪 encontró q uso de KN95 o FFP2 bien ajustado da la mayor proyección✅ Mientras q uso de 😷 quirúrgico por 20 mi…
RT @carol_perelman: Estudio🇩🇪 encontró q uso de KN95 o FFP2 bien ajustado da la mayor proyección✅ Mientras q uso de 😷 quirúrgico por 20 mi…
RT @sandralopezleon: @carol_perelman
RT @carol_perelman: Estudio🇩🇪 encontró q uso de KN95 o FFP2 bien ajustado da la mayor proyección✅ Mientras q uso de 😷 quirúrgico por 20 mi…
RT @sandralopezleon: @carol_perelman
RT @sandralopezleon: @carol_perelman
En toen was het stil...
@ggdru Er mist een plaatje: draag een goed mondneusmasker over mond en neus en zorg dat deze goed aansluit.
@KaitlinSundling @DrRupaMarya @ballerina9999 Thanks for clarifying this! Agree the chart with the hours/minutes is misleading, esp. problematic in that it can provide a false sense of security. But exposure time is one of multiple relevant factors. See thi
@TiciaVerschuere @btje01 Jeetje, zou Marc van Ranst hier meer verstand van hebben, of Leticia? 😒
@btje01 Ik was vandaag in het ziekenhuis en de enigste met een ffp2 kapje en zo moet je maar denken; gewoon jezelf goed beschermen en de rest moet maar doen wat zij vinden dat ze moeten doen. https://t.co/QOcsCr2xZr
@FransSmeets6 @lucpluijmen76 kunt risico niet uitsluiten. En het risico van een Sars-Cov-2 is heel makkelijk heel sterk te reduceren met een simpel FFP2 dus zeker voor risico patiënten is dat een hele goede optie dat stelde Belgische viroloog Mark van Rans
@GuntramPross @andikynast @ZDFheute Da hast deine evidenz https://t.co/r8W5VGFxTR
@semanthis Viel zitierte Studien pro Maske basieren auf solchen Daten. 7 Probanden wurden unter Laborbedingungen in einem 200 m3 großen Raum untersucht (Aerosole). Hat nichts mit Alltag zu tun. Uns Suchbegriffe bei Google eingeben hat nichts mit Fachwisse
RT @WolfmannotJack: @jeremyphoward @dgurdasani1 👍🏼Great & timely thread. I’m sure you know all of these papers & reports showing mask benef…
@jeremyphoward @dgurdasani1 👍🏼Great & timely thread. I’m sure you know all of these papers & reports showing mask benefits, but some of the people who happened upon your thread may not https://t.co/YbitluM1fY https://t.co/iok16LBC99 https://t.co/
One-way masking is not enough. Studies have found that even the best masks have reduced effectiveness when others in a crowd are unmasked. With the growing transmissibility of new COVID variants, the absence of requiring masks only lead to more fatalities.