The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Scale-free movement patterns in termites emerge from social interactions and preferential attachments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2004369118 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leticia R. Paiva, Alessandra Marins, Paulo F. Cristaldo, Danilo Miranda Ribeiro, Sidiney G. Alves, Andy M. Reynolds, Og DeSouza, Octavio Miramontes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 6 | 18% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 21 | 62% |
Members of the public | 12 | 35% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 17% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 14% |
Computer Science | 4 | 11% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,860,307
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#23,421
of 104,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,680
of 459,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#506
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.