↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
googleplus
4 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1018707108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradford T. Ulery, R. Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, Maria Antonia Roberts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 250 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 21%
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Researcher 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 67 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 10%
Psychology 25 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 9%
Computer Science 20 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 7%
Other 67 26%
Unknown 76 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#353,072
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,347
of 103,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,159
of 122,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#25
of 695 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 695 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.