The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1018707108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradford T. Ulery, R. Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, Maria Antonia Roberts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 254 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 71 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 26 | 10% |
| Psychology | 25 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 67 | 26% |
| Unknown | 80 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2024.
All research outputs
#213,650
of 26,741,183 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3,963
of 105,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#644
of 124,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18
of 703 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,741,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 703 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.