| Title |
Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1018707108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradford T. Ulery, R. Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, Maria Antonia Roberts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 24% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 95% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 9% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 64 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 26 | 10% |
| Psychology | 25 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 73 | 28% |
| Unknown | 73 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#349,818
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,336
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,158
of 124,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#26
of 703 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 703 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.